On 06/22/2016 01:17 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:56PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, cgroups don't make a lot of sense.
>>
>> On x86, the 48-bit virtual address is even hard-coded in the ABI[1]. So
>> we can't change *any* program's layout without either breaki
On 06/22/2016 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> >> As an example, a 32-bit x86 program really could have something mapped
>>> >> above the 32-bit boundary. It just wouldn't be useful, but the kernel
>>> >> should still understand that it's *user* memory.
>>> >>
>>> >> So you'd have PR_SET_MMAP_
+Andy, Cyrill, Dmitry who have been discussing variable TASK_SIZE on x86
on linux-mm
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=146290118818484&w=2
>>> On 04/28/2016 09:00 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
This is a summary of discussions we had on IRC between kernel and
toolchain engineers regarding suppo
