Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Fathi Boudra
Hi Riku, On 29 April 2016 at 16:06, Riku Voipio wrote: > One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back > upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned. > But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to > compare progress for the 16.06

[IMPORTANT] Regression after android-review.linaro.org upgrade to Gerrit 2.12.2

2016-04-29 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, Summary: Your SSH username on https://android-review.linaro.org will now match Linaro username (first.last) after the next login. You local repository clones need to be updated for new username. Detailed description: https://android-review.linaro.org was the first Gerrit server in Linaro,

Re: Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Al Stone
On 04/29/2016 07:06 AM, Riku Voipio wrote: > One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back > upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned. > But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to > compare progress for the 16.06 release. The

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Ricardo Salveti > wrote: >> >>> wcnss-config: 1.8 >>> optee-client: 1.0.1+git5+g89f25ce-1.linarojessie.1 >>> glshim: 0.41+git20150911.42a7739-0.linarojessie.1 >> >> We should be able to get these in debia

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > >> wcnss-config: 1.8 >> optee-client: 1.0.1+git5+g89f25ce-1.linarojessie.1 >> glshim: 0.41+git20150911.42a7739-0.linarojessie.1 > > We should be able to get these in debian. wcnss-config shouldn't go upstream, imho. at least not in its cur

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Riku Voipio wrote: >> One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back >> upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned. >> But to get things started, here's a sample

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Riku Voipio wrote: > One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back > upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned. > But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to > compare progress for the 16.06 re

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Riku Voipio wrote: > One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back > upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned. > But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to > compare progress for the 16.06 rel

Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Riku Voipio
One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned. But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to compare progress for the 16.06 release. The list of packages is collected from db410/alip image

Re: JITs and 52-bit VA

2016-04-29 Thread Alexandre Rames
For info Google v8 Javascript uses the bottom bit to tag pointers. One problem with this mechanism though is that the pointers can only be used directly with unscaled offset memory access instructions (LDUR/STUR). So in particular, no LDP/STP. On 28 April 2016 at 22:41, Wookey wrote: > +++ Adhem