On 10/17/2013 06:31 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
Hi,
On 16 October 2013 11:45, Zhou Zhu wrote:
Hi,
We are working on userspace aarch64 and aarch32 apps and we are trying to
run 32/64 mode app simultaneously.
Is there any multi-arch support for mixed rootfs (has linkers/libs of both
arm and
On 2013-10-18 04:50, Steve Capper wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
Hello,
This series adds Aarch64 support and makes some minor tweaks.
The first two patches of this series add Aarch64 support to
libhugetlbfs. (Starting from 3.11-rc1, the Linux Kernel support
Hi,
We are working on userspace aarch64 and aarch32 apps and we are trying
to run 32/64 mode app simultaneously.
Is there any multi-arch support for mixed rootfs (has linkers/libs of
both arm and arm64)?
--
Thanks,
-Zhou
___
linaro-dev mailing list
Hi Wookey,
On 10/18/2013 11:49 AM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Christopher Covington [2013-10-18 10:25 -0400]:
>
> I still haven't determined to my satisfaction whether the linaro binary
> (cross) toolchains
> can be used for multiarch cross-building by just moving files
> about/symlinking and fiddlin
+++ Christopher Covington [2013-10-18 10:25 -0400]:
> On 10/17/2013 07:21 AM, Zhou Zhu wrote:
> It would be nice if it were easier to install the binary toolchain releases
> into a multi-arch rootfs,
It would. Currently you can use distro cross-toolchains (from Ubuntu,
and Debian soon if I get
On 10/17/2013 07:21 AM, Zhou Zhu wrote:
> So how does the libraries place in the rootfs? like lib/lib64 as in x86/x64?
> Is there any similar rule in arm/arm64 system (whatever
> openebedded/ubuntu/android/...) for that? Like multi arch spec in ubuntu?
OpenEmbedded unfortunately does not support m
Am 17.10.2013 13:21, schrieb Zhou Zhu:
> On 10/17/2013 06:31 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16 October 2013 11:45, Zhou Zhu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> We are working on userspace aarch64 and aarch32 apps and we are trying to
>>> run 32/64 mode app simultaneously.
>>> Is there any multi-ar
Thanks a lot, Fathi and Victor. I was able to build and boot the 3.12.0-rc5
kernel on the Pandaboard. I went with building a uImage, but I'll try a
zImage next. It looks like I'll have to update the boot.scr (and u-boot,
based on Victor's reply), since the 13.09 boot.scr calls bootm.
Is there a re
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
> Hello,
> This series adds Aarch64 support and makes some minor tweaks.
>
> The first two patches of this series add Aarch64 support to
> libhugetlbfs. (Starting from 3.11-rc1, the Linux Kernel supports
> HugeTLB and THP for ARM64).
>
