Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 08/08/2013 06:04 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:50:57PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 08/08/2013 05:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Any great reason why not? It doesn't seem particularly controversial or anything and definitely seems useful. Just the patch author is not

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:50:57PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On 08/08/2013 05:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >Any great reason why not? It doesn't seem particularly controversial or > >anything and definitely seems useful. > Just the patch author is not with Linaro any more. So I am not very

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 08/08/2013 05:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:20:46PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 08/05/2013 11:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: These appear to be upstream anyway in one form or another. "KBuild: Allow scripts/* to be cross compiled" What's the upstreaming

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:20:46PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On 08/05/2013 11:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >These appear to be upstream anyway in one form or another. > >>"KBuild: Allow scripts/* to be cross compiled" > >What's the upstreaming status on this? > Good question. There are

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 08/05/2013 11:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:23:19PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: # Misc fixes which don't belong to any particular topic: ynk/llct-v3.10-misc-fixes "Add cross-build support to tools/lib/lk library" The 2nd chunk is still not in the mainline.

Release Critical Test Result Summary of Calendar Week 32, 2013 for Open Embedded.

2013-08-08 Thread Botao Sun
Calendar Week 32 2013: Here is release critical test result summary for Open Embedded on following configurations: 1) Minimal; 2) LAMP; 3) LEG JAVA ARMv8; 1. Minimal (Column AD): https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgB-fT5LL31CdDhwRFBoQ0NZODFFbUsxSHRKUjhBeGc#gid=2 2. LAMP

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 August 2013 12:05, Andy Green wrote: > I can see how to get it from the flat device tree by adding properties > to chosen { } and riding on early_init_dt_scan_chosen() easily enough. > From the results I have already I know on this platform that's ~500us > after where we set it up at the mom

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Andy Green
On 8 August 2013 18:50, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 August 2013 11:23, Andy Green wrote: >> On 8 August 2013 17:35, Peter Maydell wrote >>> Can't you put the relevant information into the device tree >>> so that it works on multiplatform kernels? That's the way >>> the kernel's chosen to store i

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 August 2013 11:23, Andy Green wrote: > On 8 August 2013 17:35, Peter Maydell wrote >> Can't you put the relevant information into the device tree >> so that it works on multiplatform kernels? That's the way >> the kernel's chosen to store its "this is the config for >> this platform" data, a

Release Critical Test Result Summary of Calendar Week 32, 2013 for Linaro Android.

2013-08-08 Thread Botao Sun
Calendar Week 32 2013: Here is release critical test result summary for Linaro Android image on following boards: 1) ARM Versatile Express A9; 2) Samsung Arndale; 3) TI Panda 4430; 4) TI Panda 4460; 1. ARM Versatile Express A9 (Column AU): https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Andy Green
On 8 August 2013 17:35, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 August 2013 03:44, Andy Green wrote: >> These patches give accurate, monotonic timestamps from the very first log >> entry allowing insight into where the time is going during the whole of >> the boot process. >> >> It's a debug feature like DEB

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 August 2013 03:44, Andy Green wrote: > These patches give accurate, monotonic timestamps from the very first log > entry allowing insight into where the time is going during the whole of > the boot process. > > It's a debug feature like DEBUG_LL, it does not cooperate with > ARCH_MULTIPLATFOR