Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:12:44PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 6 August 2013 20:47, Mark Brown wrote: > > Please submit things normally - attachments are non-standard and > > difficult to work with (both from the point of view of applying and from > > the point of view of workflow) and if you d

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-06 Thread Andy Green
On Aug 6, 2013 11:06 PM, "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 21:12 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > > On 6 August 2013 20:47, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:52AM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > > > >> 6) warning-elimination: nobody uses cci_pmu_destroy > > > > > >>

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-06 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 21:12 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 6 August 2013 20:47, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:52AM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > >> 6) warning-elimination: nobody uses cci_pmu_destroy > > > >> Presumably coming from the CCI stuff Tixy pulled in > > > > I'll apply

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-06 Thread Andy Green
On 6 August 2013 20:47, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:52AM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > >> I went through and split out the fixes after examining each one. > > Please submit things normally - attachments are non-standard and > difficult to work with (both from the point of view o

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:52AM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > I went through and split out the fixes after examining each one. Please submit things normally - attachments are non-standard and difficult to work with (both from the point of view of applying and from the point of view of workflow) a