Dear Andy Green,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > Instead of making assumptions on the performance of memcpy() and
>
> As I wrote, I measured the performance and got a very big gain, it's
> 3x faster on my setup to use memcpy() then default memmove().
Yes, in your single test case of copying a Lin
On 26 July 2013 20:58, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Andy Green,
>
> In message <20130726065323.27333.82421.stgit@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>> While studying the reason why kernel copy from NOR was so slow on our
>> platform,
>> I realized U-Boot is pulling it from 32-bit NOR in 8-bit chunk
Dear Andy Green,
In message <20130726065323.27333.82421.stgit@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> While studying the reason why kernel copy from NOR was so slow on our
> platform,
> I realized U-Boot is pulling it from 32-bit NOR in 8-bit chunks needlessly.
>
> bootm uses memmove() and that just
