Re: Test Result summary of 13.06 release for Linaro android Jellybean 4.2.2

2013-06-27 Thread Soumya Basak
On 27 June 2013 18:45, Soumya Basak wrote: > Linaro-android 13.06 Release (Calendar Week 26 2013): Here is the > test result summary for Linaro Android Jellybean 4.2.2 on following > boards. > > > [1] TI-Panda 4460; > > [2] TI-Panda 4430; > > [3] ST Ericsson Snowball. > > [4] ARM Versatile Expre

[ANN] android-build.linaro.org upgrade to Linaro Login Service - complete

2013-06-27 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, After couple of iterations, android-build.linaro.org was updated to authenticate against Linaro Login system. Please use your login.linaro.org username (with @linaro.org suffix) and password to login from now on. Personal jobs were also renamed to have firstname.lastname prefix instead of

Planned maintenance for review.android.git.linaro.org, Saturday 29th June

2013-06-27 Thread Philip Colmer
This is to announce a small maintenance window for review.android.git.linaro.org where we will remove support for authentication via Launchpad, and only allow authentication via Linaro Login. As a result, you will not be required to enter the long OpenID URL that you have had to use since we migrat

Test Result Summary of Linaro openembedded 13.06 release

2013-06-27 Thread Soumya Basak
Linaro 13.06 Release (Calendar Week 26 2013): Here is the test result summary for 13.06 release Linaro openembedded images. [1] Linaro openembedded Minimal images (Column: Y) https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgB-fT5LL31CdDhwRFBoQ0NZODFFbUsxSHRKUjhBeGc#gid=2 please refer

Test Result summary of 13.06 release for Linaro android Jellybean 4.2.2

2013-06-27 Thread Soumya Basak
Linaro-android 13.06 Release (Calendar Week 26 2013): Here is the test result summary for Linaro Android Jellybean 4.2.2 on following boards. [1] TI-Panda 4460; [2] TI-Panda 4430; [3] ST Ericsson Snowball. [4] ARM Versatile Express A9; [5] Galaxy Nexus; [6] Samsung Arndale; [1] TI-Panda

Re: One HMP issue over TC2

2013-06-27 Thread Lei Wen
After I further disable CONFIG_DISABLE_CPU_SCHED_DOMAIN_BALANCE option, seems things get better now. And thread now could be distributed across the cluster. One more question here, seems it is interesting to see that when A7 and A15 both are running at same frequency, their calculation capacity se

One HMP issue over TC2

2013-06-27 Thread Lei Wen
Sorry for inconvenience, as my bad mail editor... Change the mail subject to the corrected one On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Lei Wen wrote: > Hi Morten and list, > > I am current investigating HMP related stuff over TC2 platform, and > find a strange issue. > Here I have two module, both are c

cx...@marvell.com, wwan...@marvell.com, yta...@marvell.com, lei...@marvell.com

2013-06-27 Thread Lei Wen
Hi Morten and list, I am current investigating HMP related stuff over TC2 platform, and find a strange issue. Here I have two module, both are creating fixed loaded thread, but one module would bound those thread to the cpu, while another don't do the bound operation. [I test with linaro 2013.05

sched: Load-balancing within HMP domain in the HMP scheduler

2013-06-27 Thread J
Hi. I have been trying to apply Linaro's HMP scheduler to a big.LITTLE machine, which has 4 big and 4 LITTLE cores. However, I could only utilize two cores with the HMP scheduler. While hmp_select_faster_cpu() always selects the first core in the big cluster and hmp_select_slower_cpu() always se

Re: sched: Load-balancing within HMP domain in the HMP scheduler

2013-06-27 Thread Viresh Kumar
Adding its author in cc. On 27 June 2013 14:16, J wrote: > > Hi. > > I have been trying to apply Linaro's HMP scheduler to a big.LITTLE > machine, which has 4 big and 4 LITTLE cores. > However, I could only utilize two cores with the HMP scheduler. > > While hmp_select_faster_cpu() always selects

Re: Perf test giving strange results

2013-06-27 Thread Milosz Wasilewski
On 26 June 2013 11:42, Andy Green wrote: > On 26 June 2013 17:57, Milosz Wasilewski wrote: >> On 26 June 2013 09:16, Andy Green wrote: > > Hi Milosz - > >>> test 5 (parse event tests) seems to be badly broken. >>> >>> Is this just our problem or is it broken for everyone? >> >> I'm not sure if t