Pawel, Nicolas,
Thanks for the clarification :), dropping.
sanjay
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 09:00 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Pawel Moll wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 06:33 +0100, Sanjay Singh Rawat wrote:
use cpu_do_idle for entering the wfi mode.
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Sing
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 06:33 +0100, Sanjay Singh Rawat wrote:
> > >> use cpu_do_idle for entering the wfi mode.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat
> > >> ---
> > >> arch/arm/mach-vexpress/hotplug.c |3 ++-
> > >> 1 file changed, 2 insert
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 22:49 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> Blows chunks the same with this
>
> cpus {
> #size-cells = <0>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
>
> cpu@0 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> reg = <0>;
> };
> cpu@1 {
> compatible = "arm,co
Blows chunks the same with this
cpus {
#size-cells = <0>;
#address-cells = <1>;
cpu@0 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
reg = <0>;
};
cpu@1 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
reg = <1>;
};
};
I think it's following Lo
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 22:09 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> Thanks. This and the similar issue with perf might be telling us a
> global probed SoC capability flag for bL or-ed with the config being
> there might be helpful.
Now we have accepted DT bindings for cpu nodes [1] perhaps all board's
device-
Thanks. This and the similar issue with perf might be telling us a
global probed SoC capability flag for bL or-ed with the config being
there might be helpful.
-Andy
On 11 June 2013 22:01, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:30 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
>> No, unfortunately I a
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:30 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> No, unfortunately I am evidently ahead of the times ^^ -- your patch
> does not fix my bug...
>
> I have a valid DT table, it's just not on a SoC that has big.LITTLE.
>
> mpidr_cpuids_count is 0 and nr_cpu_ids is 2 ...
>
> Instead of using D
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't heard back from anyone regarding my last request. If there are no
> objections, I'll go ahead and publish this patch to LKML and LAKML.
No objections from me, Sebastian. When you have time and the inclination
No, unfortunately I am evidently ahead of the times ^^ -- your patch
does not fix my bug...
I have a valid DT table, it's just not on a SoC that has big.LITTLE.
mpidr_cpuids_count is 0 and nr_cpu_ids is 2 ...
Instead of using DT being there or not it seems you need to test
something more to do w
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:08 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> I see... I was still on -rc4
>
> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=commitdiff;h=882503738c0cbef28da55b511913c0c603016e26
>
> ...behind the times...
Actually, it was also fixed on -rc4 too [1]. From your BUG()
I see... I was still on -rc4
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=commitdiff;h=882503738c0cbef28da55b511913c0c603016e26
...behind the times... thanks for the fix.
-Andy
On 11 June 2013 21:04, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 20:29 +0800, Andy G
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 20:29 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> If you have a CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM kernel, with big.LITTLE
> configured but running on say, a CA9 system, and you have gator from
> llct, and you insert gator
Looks like a bug I fixed a week ago...
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Hi -
If you have a CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM kernel, with big.LITTLE
configured but running on say, a CA9 system, and you have gator from
llct, and you insert gator
root@localhost:~# modprobe gator
[ 73.951009] [ cut here ]
[ 73.955673] kernel BUG at
/projects/lina
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 06:33 +0100, Sanjay Singh Rawat wrote:
> >> use cpu_do_idle for entering the wfi mode.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/mach-vexpress/hotplug.c |3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm
14 matches
Mail list logo
