Hi Samuel,
On 16 May 2013 12:52, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Maresh,
>
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:15:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> Ping.
>>
>> On 17 April 2013 21:16, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Naresh Kamboju
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 12 April 2013 04:07, Linus
On 17 May 2013 09:06, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 16 May 2013 22:11, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> On 05/15/2013 10:59 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/15/2013 12:04 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule
>
> T
On 16 May 2013 22:11, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 10:59 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>>
>> On 05/15/2013 12:04 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>>
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule
The 13.05 linux-linaro release will be v3.10-rc2 base
Hi Andrey,
big LITTLE MP v17 is ready for you to pull.
Updates:
---
- Rebased over 3.10-rc1
- Stats: Total distinct patches: 41
- New Patches:
- master-wq-migration-v5: 5 (Already Applied for 3.11 by Tejun Heo).
This is currently disabled by default and
On 17 May 2013 09:48, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 May 2013 22:58, John Stultz wrote:
>> Do you have a git branch with the queue you just sent Todd available? It
>> probably would be easiest to just merge that in.
>
> Yes I do have it. It is android-experimental-3.9 based. Can we merge
> that simp
Fixing linaro dev address
On 16 May 2013 22:18, Chris Redpath wrote:
> rq->nr_running is the actual number of runnable tasks we wish to use
> to determine if a task is alone on a CPU.
>
> Change-Id: Icaf3022e02924ecdc94e14d4146c6fadd9580e2b
> Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath
> ---
> kernel/sched/fa
Fixing Linaro dev addresss.
On 16 May 2013 22:18, Chris Redpath wrote:
> If the entity is not a task, it is a cfs group rq. Iterate up to
> find the task entity.
>
> Change-Id: I7cab7aba0798f6f14e38ad32e566d90e5937ffbc
> Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++
Fixing linaro dev address
On 16 May 2013 22:18, Chris Redpath wrote:
> Previously, an offline CPU would always appear to have a zero load
> and this would distort the offload functionality used for balancing
> big and little domains.
>
> Maintain a mask of online CPUs in each domain and use this
You missed "lists." in linaro-dev address.
On 16 May 2013 22:17, Chris Redpath wrote:
> Hi Viresh, this patch set contains 3 fixed for issues I've seen recently
> in the HMP reference patch set. Please would you be able to take them
> and make a new v17 branch :)
>
> These are rebased onto the v1
On 16 May 2013 22:58, John Stultz wrote:
> Do you have a git branch with the queue you just sent Todd available? It
> probably would be easiest to just merge that in.
Yes I do have it. It is android-experimental-3.9 based. Can we merge
that simply with linux-linaro or it is required to be rebased
On 05/15/2013 10:59 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On 05/15/2013 12:04 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule
The 13.05 linux-linaro release will be v3.10-rc2 based,
May 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20130515.1
* Done: the tag is ll-2013
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> From previous discussions between Achin, Charles and Nico I am aware
> that Nico has decided for the moment that target residency should be
> useful enough to be used by MCPM. That is because Nico is a big
> proponent of doing everything in the kernel a
On 05/16/2013 02:47 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16 May 2013 14:58, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Todd and others,
If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct
policy (per package), currently we can't have multiple instances of same
governor. i.e. We can't have multiple
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:05:10PM +0100, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> Regarding your comments about using the C-state instead of the residency, we
> based off of the existing mcpm_suspend call which currently takes residency
> (with a 0 meaning lowest power).
>
> We used calls (inc
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:05:10PM +0100, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> Regarding your comments about using the C-state instead of the residency, we
> based off of the existing mcpm_suspend call which currently takes residency
> (with a 0 meaning lowest power).
>
> We used calls (inc
On Thu, 16 May 2013 14:25:07 +0200
"Mian M. Hamayun" wrote:
> but even this option doesn't work for me as the apparent lacking support for
> Aarch64 in "glib-2.12".
> I have used the following configure command:
> ./configure --prefix=/my/prefix/path --host=aarch64-linux-gnu
> --cache-file=aarc
Hello Everyone,
I am reposting the following message to linaro-dev as I am using the
following linaro toolchain for ARM64 cross-compilation:
https://wiki.linaro.org/HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel
In fact, I am trying to compile qemu for Aarch64 but so far I haven't been able
to configure qemu for thi
Hi Maresh,
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:15:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On 17 April 2013 21:16, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Naresh Kamboju
> > wrote:
> >> On 12 April 2013 04:07, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>> Hey it works. Didn't see this before I fixe
On 16 May 2013 14:58, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Todd and others,
>
> If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct
> policy (per package), currently we can't have multiple instances of same
> governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of Interactive governor for
19 matches
Mail list logo
