Hi,
On 9 May 2013 19:57, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Who will maintain those layers after my leave? This was not decided yet.
> There are few guys at Linaro who know how to use OpenEmbedded but most
> of them is outside of Builds and Baselines team.
>
> If you have any questions then better ask n
W dniu 09.05.2013 20:42, Trevor Woerner pisze:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
> wrote:
>> Who will maintain those layers after my leave? This was not decided
>> yet. There are few guys at Linaro who know how to use OpenEmbedded
>> but most of them is outside of Builds and B
On 9 May 2013 20:03, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to forward this thread from LAKML to linaro-dev:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/10683
>
> Seems there is lots desire for an improvement to automated build
> coverage and automated reporting along with it.
I
Hi all,
I just wanted to forward this thread from LAKML to linaro-dev:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/10683
Seems there is lots desire for an improvement to automated build
coverage and automated reporting along with it.
Regards,
Mike
__
NOTE: I skipped "openembedded-devel" ML cause most of users of Linaro
layers also read OE Core ML.
As I will leave Linaro at the end of May I would like to write some kind
of summary of current state of Linaro layers for OpenEmbedded.
At Linaro we have 3 layers:
1. meta-aarch64
2. meta-linaro
3.