On 20 February 2013 11:00, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Yes, the moderator lets these emails in and whitelists known upstream
> developers upon request. Please let Anmar or Philip know any such
> email addresses.
Okay. I got this.
But what i requested was a bit more than that... In current case somebo
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I really don't know whom to direct this mail to and hence the wide spread.
>
> Problem: When we send a mail to kernel mailing lists with linaro-dev
> or linaro-kernel
> in cc, and we get replies to those mails, sometimes the mail
Hi Guys,
I really don't know whom to direct this mail to and hence the wide spread.
Problem: When we send a mail to kernel mailing lists with linaro-dev
or linaro-kernel
in cc, and we get replies to those mails, sometimes the mails from
outside people
doesn't reach us back on linaro mailing lists
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, James Tunnicliffe
wrote:
> On 19 February 2013 16:08, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:53 PM, James Tunnicliffe
>> wrote:
>>> Good point! I would be pleasantly surprised if an image + hwpack from
>>> 2010 worked with our current tools.
>>
>> Act
On 02/19/2013 07:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> I am working on identifying the different wakeup sources from the
>> interrupts and I have a question regarding the timer broadcast.
>>
>> The broadcast timer is setup to the next event and that will wake
Hi,
I am working on identifying the different wakeup sources from the
interrupts and I have a question regarding the timer broadcast.
The broadcast timer is setup to the next event and that will wake up any
idle cpu belonging to the "broadcast cpumask", right ?
The cpu which has been woken up w
I've added the linaro-dev list to the cc as I think my answer is useful
for everyone working with Linaro's kernels...
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:54 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2013 8:50 PM, "Dietmar Eggemann"
> wrote:
> >
> > there're a couple of config switches for android and ubuntu:
On 19 February 2013 16:08, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:53 PM, James Tunnicliffe
> wrote:
>> Good point! I would be pleasantly surprised if an image + hwpack from
>> 2010 worked with our current tools.
>
> Actually, I am surprised if they do not work.
>
> Our official promise
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:53 PM, James Tunnicliffe
wrote:
> Good point! I would be pleasantly surprised if an image + hwpack from
> 2010 worked with our current tools.
Actually, I am surprised if they do not work.
Our official promise on lit has always been that:
1. all hwpacks and rootfs ever
On 19 February 2013 14:50, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>> On 5 February 2013 08:05, Lukasz Majewski
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Vincent,
>> >
>> >> Hi Lukasz,
>> >>
>> >> I still need to get figures for the cover letter of the V3 of
>> >> packing small tasks patches. Nevertheless, the patches se
Good point! I would be pleasantly surprised if an image + hwpack from
2010 worked with our current tools.
James
On 19 February 2013 12:02, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> I think you are trying to install a very, very old hardware pack based
> off "maverick" - for which the ubuntu repositories
Hi Vincent,
> On 5 February 2013 08:05, Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> >> Hi Lukasz,
> >>
> >> I still need to get figures for the cover letter of the V3 of
> >> packing small tasks patches. Nevertheless, the patches series is
> >> available here:
> >> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb
Hmm.
I think you are trying to install a very, very old hardware pack based
off "maverick" - for which the ubuntu repositories have been
deleted...
You might have out of luck if that hwpack really needs packages from
the archives, but if you are lucky it has everything it needs included
and you m
As James said, Anything from the LTS (12.04 - Precise) onwards.
Dave
On 19 Feb 2013, at 10:02, Amar Shankar
wrote:
> No
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 19 February 2013 11:29, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 18 February 2013 16:40, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> 2013/2/18 Vincent Guittot :
>>> On 18 February 2013 15:38, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
I pasted the original at: http://pastebin.com/DMm5U8J8
>>>
>>> We can clear the idle flag only i
On 18 February 2013 16:40, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/2/18 Vincent Guittot :
>> On 18 February 2013 15:38, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> I pasted the original at: http://pastebin.com/DMm5U8J8
>>
>> We can clear the idle flag only in the nohz_kick_needed which will not
>> be called if the
No, its lucid (Ubuntu 10.04).
Could you please let me know which Ubuntu version do we need to use for this?
Regards,
Amar
From: Dave Pigott [dave.pig...@linaro.org]
Sent: 19 February, 2013 3:13 PM
To: Amar Shankar
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; Prasad Raju
Subjec
Yea, was about to say the same thing. You need to be running the
latest Ubuntu release or the latest LTS release or it is likely that
Linaro Image Tools won't work.
James
On 19 February 2013 09:43, Dave Pigott wrote:
> Just a thought: It looks to me to be down to using 10.10 (Maverick) - I'm
> n
Just a thought: It looks to me to be down to using 10.10 (Maverick) - I'm not
sure l-m-c supports that far back, but I may be wrong.
On 19 Feb 2013, at 05:31, Amar Shankar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to create beagle_sd.img for beagle board using
> linaro-media-create, by referring the
19 matches
Mail list logo
