Re: [PATCH Resend 1/3] sched: fix nr_busy_cpus with coupled cpuidle

2013-01-24 Thread Vincent Guittot
On 24 January 2013 17:44, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > 2012/12/3 Vincent Guittot : >> With the coupled cpuidle driver (but probably also with other drivers), >> a CPU loops in a temporary safe state while waiting for other CPUs of its >> cluster to be ready to enter the coupled C-state. If an IRQ

Re: [powerdebug,1/1] clock: support common clock framework

2013-01-24 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Sanjay Singh Rawat (2013-01-24 08:01:33) > Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat Sanjay, Have you seen the patch to dump the CCF tree from a single sysfs file, in JSON format? http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/mturquette/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=bddca8944a7ab6699984c4b1b677261eb1c8d819;

[powerdebug,1/1] clock: support common clock framework

2013-01-24 Thread Sanjay Singh Rawat
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat --- clocks.c | 69 ++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/clocks.c b/clocks.c index 2611a0d..95acf57 100644 --- a/clocks.c +++ b/clocks.c @@ -42,9 +42,19 @@ struct clock_inf

Re: [kvmarm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Virtio-desktop: Virtio-based virtual desktop

2013-01-24 Thread Rob Taylor
On 24/01/13 14:52, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 24.01.2013, at 15:42, Peter Maydell wrote: >> ...do we have an ARM PCI controller of any working kind in >> the kernel? versatilepb's PCI controller doesn't count as >> it is utterly broken :-) > > Don't the Marvell chips have PCI? And Tegra? I'm su

Re: [kvmarm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Virtio-desktop: Virtio-based virtual desktop

2013-01-24 Thread Alexander Graf
On 24.01.2013, at 15:42, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 24 January 2013 14:38, Alexander Graf wrote: >> But check out the QEMU e500 machine. We have a fully device tree >> based machine type in the kernel. QEMU drives it by generating a >> device tree for devices it actually exposes on the fly. > >

Re: [kvmarm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Virtio-desktop: Virtio-based virtual desktop

2013-01-24 Thread Peter Maydell
On 24 January 2013 14:38, Alexander Graf wrote: > But check out the QEMU e500 machine. We have a fully device tree > based machine type in the kernel. QEMU drives it by generating a > device tree for devices it actually exposes on the fly. The ARM equivalent for that would be mach-virt, I think (

Re: [kvmarm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Virtio-desktop: Virtio-based virtual desktop

2013-01-24 Thread Alexander Graf
On 24.01.2013, at 10:25, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all >> possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can >> emulate it without worrying about g

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Virtio-desktop: Virtio-based virtual desktop

2013-01-24 Thread Anup Patel
On 24 January 2013 14:55, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all > > possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can > > emulate it without worrying abo

Re: Cheap Quad-A9 board

2013-01-24 Thread Dongjin Kim
Hi, I also have it and working to put latest kernel, faster than other ARM hardware I have ever. And according to Hardkernel people who made the hardware, they success to make it run up to 2.0GHz with addition fan on the heatsink. They put the board in the heatsink for people who love over clockin

Cheap Quad-A9 board

2013-01-24 Thread Renato Golin Linaro
Anyone seen this? http://www.hardkernel.com/renewal_2011/products/prdt_info.php It's cheaper than a Pandaboard with a quad-core and 2GB or RAM and ridiculously small. That would probably get my LLVM builds under 1h... But it seems too good to be true, does any one have experience with it? cheer