RE: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: exynos: enable/disable cpuidle when cpu1 is down/up

2013-01-17 Thread Kukjin Kim
Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 01/10/2013 11:33 PM, amit daniel kachhap wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > >> On 01/10/2013 09:07 PM, amit daniel kachhap wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> Hi Amit Daniel, > >> > >>> This hotplug noifiers looks fine. I suppose it sh

Re: sched: Consequences of integrating the Per Entity Load Tracking Metric into the Load Balancer

2013-01-17 Thread Alex Shi
On 01/17/2013 01:17 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:08:21 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> On 01/08/2013 04:41 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote: >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> Thank you very much for such a clear and comprehensive explanation. >>> So when I put together the problem and the proposed soluti

Re: sched: Consequences of integrating the Per Entity Load Tracking Metric into the Load Balancer

2013-01-17 Thread Preeti U Murthy
Hi Namhyung, >> I re-written the patch as following. hackbench/aim9 doest show clean >> performance change. >> Actually we can get some profit. it also will be very slight. :) >> BTW, it still need another patch before apply this. Just to show the logical. >> >> === >>> From 145ff27744c8

Re: sched: Consequences of integrating the Per Entity Load Tracking Metric into the Load Balancer

2013-01-17 Thread Preeti U Murthy
Hi Alex, On 01/16/2013 07:38 PM, Alex Shi wrote: > On 01/08/2013 04:41 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> Thank you very much for such a clear and comprehensive explanation. >> So when I put together the problem and the proposed solution pieces in the >> current >> scheduler scalability