Currently when none of CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_DSA, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_EDSA and
CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_TRAILER is defined, we get following compilation warnings:
net/dsa/slave.c:51:12: warning: 'dsa_slave_init' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
net/dsa/slave.c:60:12: warning: 'dsa_slave_open' defin
Yes, I'll be ready with an update for Wednesday.
On 23 November 2012 09:00, David Rusling wrote:
> Are we close to giving a big.LITTLE update to the TSC (both MP and IKS) on
> Wednesday?
>
> Dave
>
> On 23 Nov 2012, at 13:26, David Zinman wrote:
>
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/projects/big.LITTLE.
Are we close to giving a big.LITTLE update to the TSC (both MP and IKS) on
Wednesday?
Dave
On 23 Nov 2012, at 13:26, David Zinman wrote:
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/projects/big.LITTLE.MP
>
>
> big.LITTLE MP v12 has been built:
> http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2012-November/
Hello Viresh,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 01:42:06AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +static inline int delay_for_sampling_rate(unsigned int sampling_rate)
> +{
> + int delay = usecs_to_jiffies(sampling_rate);
> +
> + /* We want all CPUs to do sampling nearly on same jiffy */
> + if (num_onli
From: "hongbo.zhang"
utils/heat_cpu output file should be ignored by git.
also add *.patch into .gitignore.
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
.gitignore | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e21ff87..02090c0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@
From: "hongbo.zhang"
if there is no thermal zone, all the thermal tests should be skipped.
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
thermal/thermal_sanity.sh | 33 +
thermal/thermal_sanity.txt | 1 +
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 thermal/thermal
From: "hongbo.zhang"
the greater-than symbol ">" in if state isn't valid and a file named "0" will
be created in this case, "-gt" should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
include/thermal_functions.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/the
> How do you want this patch to be treated?
>
> Is this a patch or a branch? If it's a branch, why are you referencing
> it? Have you issued a pull request? If it's a patch (I'm assuming it
> hasn't been accepted yet), then you should just fix it up into the
> patch.
My apologies, I've just seen A
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:13:44AM +0530, Rajanikanth H.V wrote:
> [...]
> > +/*
> > + * Note that the batres_vs_temp table must be strictly sorted by falling
> > + * temperature values to work.
> > + */
> > +struct batres_vs_temp temp_to_batres_tbl_thermistor[] = {
>
> It must be static.
>
>
How do you want this patch to be treated?
> From: "Rajanikanth H.V"
>
> enforce static linkage for battery attributes structures
>
> this patch is against: "mfd-ab8500-add-devicetree-support-for-fuelgauge"
Is this a patch or a branch? If it's a branch, why are you referencing
it? Have you issu
10 matches
Mail list logo
