On 27 September 2012 08:09, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> Is there any sensible comparison document for gcc vs rvct in terms of speed,
> code size, feature set? Is there any reason / use case to recommend rvct
> over gcc for non-Linux s/w?
Hi Nicolas. I'd recommend talking with AR
Em Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:02:14 +0100
Sangwook Lee escreveu:
> This patch adds driver for S5K4ECGX sensor with embedded ISP SoC,
> S5K4ECGX, which is a 5M CMOS Image sensor from Samsung
> The driver implements preview mode of the S5K4ECGX sensor.
> capture (snapshot) operation, face detection are mi
Hi there,
Is there any sensible comparison document for gcc vs rvct in terms of speed,
code size, feature set? Is there any reason / use case to recommend rvct over
gcc for non-Linux s/w?
Thx
nicolas
Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve Loubet.
036 420 040 R.C
Greetings,
On 09/14/2012 01:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I think we need to discuss whether the multiplatform branch should still
be included in the linux-linaro-core-tracking tree. At the ARM mini summit
in San Diego, we discussed in length about how we want to get to actual
multiplatform kernel
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 15:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 26 September 2012 14:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 6 September 2012 18:12, Dave Martin wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
> >>
> >> This patch causes the kernel to get stuck
On 26 September 2012 15:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 14:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 6 September 2012 18:12, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
>>
>> This patch causes the kernel to get stuck at "Calibrating delay loop...".
>>
>> I'm not sure why this happens
On 26 September 2012 14:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 September 2012 18:12, Dave Martin wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
>
> This patch causes the kernel to get stuck at "Calibrating delay loop...".
>
> I'm not sure why this happens (investigating) but if I move the
> enter_hyp macro call
On 6 September 2012 18:12, Dave Martin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
This patch causes the kernel to get stuck at "Calibrating delay loop...".
I'm not sure why this happens (investigating) but if I move the
enter_hyp macro call back to where it used to be (leaving the rest of
the patch in
On 25 September 2012 23:26, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:06:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> +config MIGRATE_WQ
>> + bool "(EXPERIMENTAL) Migrate Workqueues to non-idle cpu"
>> + depends on SMP && EXPERIMENTAL
>> + help
>> + Workqueues queues work on current cp
I'm asking on the igloo forum.
Dave
On 26 Sep 2012, at 11:31, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
> did u check with calao system's hardware engineer?
>
> On 26 September 2012 15:48, Dave Pigott wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I Thought I'd let you know that we now have 5 more ST-Ericsson Snowball V11
>> PDKs in L
did u check with calao system's hardware engineer?
On 26 September 2012 15:48, Dave Pigott wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I Thought I'd let you know that we now have 5 more ST-Ericsson Snowball V11
> PDKs in LAVA. They went live yesterday afternoon. In total we now have 10
> snowballs but only 8 are availa
Hi all,
I Thought I'd let you know that we now have 5 more ST-Ericsson Snowball V11
PDKs in LAVA. They went live yesterday afternoon. In total we now have 10
snowballs but only 8 are available because one of them has been sidelined for
staging, and another is not playing ball. I'm working on tr
12 matches
Mail list logo
