On 09/07/2012 07:22 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Dani
On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano
On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, R
Hi Tixy,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 22:34 +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
> > I have several questions related how to run the mp over fastmodel.
> > For the kernel config file, I see there are many for VE:
> > android_vexpress_defconfig
> > ubuntu_ve
On 09/07/2012 01:04 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
>> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
>>
>> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
>> s
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
>
> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
> sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Currently we have the cpuidle_device field in the acpi_processor_power
> structure.
> This adds a dependency in processor.h for cpuidle.h.
>
> In order to be consistent with the rest of the drivers and for the per cpu
> states
> coming righ
Patch 1 and 3 are independent cleanups. Perhaps you can separate them
out from the per-cpu latency series in case you have to repost.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The cpuidle core takes care of filling this field from drv->state_count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
We have the cpuidle states pointer stored in the cpuidle device
structure. This patch use this pointer instead of the driver's one.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver
Tested-by: Peter De Schrijver
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 17 +
drivers/
Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3 and big.LITTLE.
These architectures have different cpus with d
Currently we have the cpuidle_device field in the acpi_processor_power
structure.
This adds a dependency in processor.h for cpuidle.h.
In order to be consistent with the rest of the drivers and for the per cpu
states
coming right after this patch, this one move out of the acpi_processor_power
st
This variable is only used in the in processor_driver.c.
This patch reduces the scope of the variable by moving it
to this file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver
Tested-by: Peter De Schrijver
---
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |2 +-
include/acpi/processor.h
The tegra3 and big.LITTLE architecture have different cpu latencies.
This API allows to specify a different cpu latency for a specific cpu.
With the previous patches, we use the per cpuidle device states pointer,
this function overrides this pointer.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Acked-by: Deept
The cpuidle core takes care of filling this field from drv->state_count.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 084b1d2..fc4757e
This patch adds a pointer to the cpuidle_state array in the cpuidle_device
structure. When the cpuidle_device is initialized, the pointer is assigned
from the driver's cpuidle states array.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver
Tested-by: Peter D
Hi Guys,
I have flashed my SD card with linaro-media-create with precise-devel
and latest h/w pack (12.08)
Now i have two requirements:
- Always use my copy of devel instead of the new devel everytime from
the latest release
As i do install a lot of stuff on it. Will apt-get update would be
eno
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 22:34 +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
> I have several questions related how to run the mp over fastmodel.
> For the kernel config file, I see there are many for VE:
> android_vexpress_defconfig
> ubuntu_vexpress_defconfig
> vexpress_defconfig
> vexpress_tc2_defconfig
> Which one is sui
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 11:
Hi,
I am trying to boot kernel on panda board. I got the source from:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-linaro
Following is my branch HEAD:
commit 7f39bb7ab9591c6254e5930a00d762e4b37f08b2
Merge: 1d10459 8b29cd5
Author: Andrey Konovalov
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, Septembe
20 matches
Mail list logo