Re: Ubuntu config fragment

2012-07-10 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:01:20AM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> > > I notice the new ubuntu.conf seems to contain everything including the >> > > kitchen sink. It has things which (as people found out at release time) >> > >

Re: Ubuntu config fragment

2012-07-10 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > Adding in Linaro Dev list for more visibility... > > On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 14:08 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> > Hi Ricardo >> > >> > I notice the new ubuntu.conf seems t

Fwd: No space left on device at linaro-android-media-create

2012-07-10 Thread Chunsang Jeong
I've resolved the problem below by partitioning sdcard manually, i.e. increased system partition and used --no-part option with linaro-android-media-create, but I believe linaro-android-media-create seems to change default system partition size as the Linaro android image comes bigger. --

Power Meter

2012-07-10 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Check out our new NI power meter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYRogshDyVo&feature=plcp We're gonna hook this thing up to LAVA. Its a pretty nice piece of equipment. Specs: NI PXIe-1073 with a NI PXIE-4154 Battery Simulator. -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams L

Agenda for the 2012/7/11 Linaro Android Platform Team Meeting Posted

2012-07-10 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Take a look: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Meetings/2012-07-11 See everyone tomorrow morning on irc.freenode.net in #linaro-meeting at 8 AM Texas time, 14:00 UTC. -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow L

Re: Config check fails for linux-linaro-lt-omap-3.4-3.4.0

2012-07-10 Thread John Rigby
There will shortly be a new kernel linux-linaro-lt-omap-3.4_3.4.0-1.1~120710203036 in the kernel ppa: https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/kernel with the kernel_build issue fixed. Now we can get back to the original issue. --john On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:47 AM, David Cullen

Re: Config check fails for linux-linaro-lt-omap-3.4-3.4.0

2012-07-10 Thread David Cullen
Hello, John, On 7/10/2012 12:52 PM, John Rigby wrote: > I thnk we need to start at the beginning. Where did you get the > source you are working with. In your original post I assumed that > this was source extracted with dpkg-source from a linaro kernel source > pkg. I used apt-get source

Re: Config check fails for linux-linaro-lt-omap-3.4-3.4.0

2012-07-10 Thread John Rigby
David, I thnk we need to start at the beginning. Where did you get the source you are working with. In your original post I assumed that this was source extracted with dpkg-source from a linaro kernel source pkg. --john On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, David Cullen wrote: > Hello, linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 Btemp

2012-07-10 Thread Lee Jones
Some of my comments are picky, but if it's going into Mainline, it should at least look professional. You didn't CC the ST-Ericsson internal mailing list. Address is stericsson_nomadik_li...@list.st.com I'll do it for now, but please do so on your next submission. On 10/07/12 15:23, Rajanikan

Config check fails for linux-linaro-lt-omap-3.4-3.4.0

2012-07-10 Thread David Cullen
Hello, linaro-dev, I am using the instructions in the "adjust kernel config" section at this link: > https://wiki.linaro.org/KenWerner/Sandbox/CreateCustomKernelDeb When I run # fakeroot debian/rules editconfigs I get the the following errors: > Running config-check for all configurations

Re: What is the purpose of the kernel_build subdirectory in the Linaro kernel source?

2012-07-10 Thread John Rigby
just remove it On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:15 AM, David Cullen wrote: > Hello, John, > > On 7/9/2012 9:20 PM, John Rigby wrote: >> This is probably a bug in the new kernel packaging scripts. I will >> check into it. > > > Can I just remove the "kernel_build" subdirectory for now? Or > should I bu

Re: What is the purpose of the kernel_build subdirectory in the Linaro kernel source?

2012-07-10 Thread David Cullen
Hello, John, On 7/9/2012 9:20 PM, John Rigby wrote: > This is probably a bug in the new kernel packaging scripts. I will > check into it. Can I just remove the "kernel_build" subdirectory for now? Or should I build the kernel out of the "kernel_build" subdirectory? > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2

Re: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 Btemp

2012-07-10 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 10 July 2012, Rajanikanth H.V wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/ab8500/btemp.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ > +AB8500 Battery Termperature Monitor Driver > + > +AB8500 is a mixed signal multimedia and power management > +device comprising: power and e

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE

2012-07-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 14:35 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > May be the last one which enable ARCH_POWER should also go into tip ? > OK, I can take it. ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/li

[PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 Btemp

2012-07-10 Thread Rajanikanth H . V
From: "Rajanikanth H.V" This patch adds device tree support for battery temperature monitor driver Signed-off-by: Rajanikanth H.V --- .../bindings/power_supply/ab8500/btemp.txt | 54 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi | 17 + arch/arm/mach-ux500/Makefile

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE

2012-07-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:27 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > This patchset creates an arch_scale_freq_power function for ARM, which is > used > to set the relative capacity of each core of a big.LITTLE system. It also > removes > the broken power estimation of x86. > > Modification since v3: >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure

2012-07-10 Thread Rajendra Nayak
As the architectures tend to add more cores [1][2], that means more memory consumption. In a very near future, we will have 100 cores in a cpu. Assuming we have 4 C-states, that is 100 * 4 * 8 = 3200 bytes of memory used for a single function. IMHO, the kernel shouldn't assume the user must add mo

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE

2012-07-10 Thread Vincent Guittot
On 10 July 2012 13:27, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:27 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> This patchset creates an arch_scale_freq_power function for ARM, which is >> used >> to set the relative capacity of each core of a big.LITTLE system. It also >> removes >> the broken powe

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure

2012-07-10 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 07/10/2012 10:29 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Friday 06 July 2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> The main purpose of all these cleanup patches are to move out all >> non-data information from the cpuidle_state structure in order to add a >> new api which could be 'cpuidle_r

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure

2012-07-10 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Hi Daniel, On Friday 06 July 2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: The main purpose of all these cleanup patches are to move out all non-data information from the cpuidle_state structure in order to add a new api which could be 'cpuidle_register_cpu_latency(int cpu, struct cpuidle_latencies laten