Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Andrey Konovalov < andrey.konova...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 05/17/2012 06:40 PM, Andy Green wrote: > >> On 17/05/12 17:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >>> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>> Greetings, So

Re: Optimized kernel memcpy/memset

Hi there, I would like to do the same things with you guys in my devkit8000 board and see the performance. But since the kernel does not support NEON by default, how can we enable that SIMD? Could someone give me a point to figure out? ___ linaro-d

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Andy Green wrote: > On 22/05/12 01:58, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33:47AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: like Andy, I am a bit concerned that we merge the android stuff into the linaro-core and that we get android

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

On 22/05/12 04:02, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 11/05/12 08:27, Somebody in the thread at some point said: 4. in between RCs, we only move mainline on our linux-linaro release baseline forward if we see a working tracking

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 22/05/12 01:58, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33:47AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: like Andy, I am a bit concerned that we merge the android stuff into the linaro-core and that we get android candies in 'vanilla' kernel. can't we (shouldn't we) have -andro

[PATCH v5 5/7] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

Add common cpuidle init functionality that can be used by various imx platforms. Signed-off-by: Robert Lee --- arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile |1 + arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpuidle.c | 80 ++ arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/cpuidle.h | 22 ++

[PATCH v5 4/7] ARM: imx: Enable imx53 low power idle

Add various functionality needed to enable a imx53 low power idle state. This includes adding the imx53 gpc_dvfs clock and making a common imx5_late_init function and initializing all imx53 MACHINE_STATE late_init calls to imx5_late_init. Signed-off-by: Robert Lee --- arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx

[PATCH v5 6/7] ARM: imx: Add imx5 cpuidle

Add cpuidle driver for imx5 platform. Signed-off-by: Robert Lee --- arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx5.c | 43 +-- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx5.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx5.c index b3dcd8e..19621ed1 100

[PATCH v5 3/7] ARM: imx: clean and consolidate imx5 suspend and idle code

The imx5 idle code that existed in mm-imx5.c is moved to pm-imx5.c. The imx5_pm_init call is now exported and called during the MACHINE_START late_init in supported imx5 platforms. Remove various enabling/disabling of the gpc_dvfs clock and enable it once during initialization. This is a very low

[PATCH v5 7/7] ARM: imx: Add imx6q cpuidle driver

Add basic imx6q cpuidle driver. For now, only basic WFI state is supported. Deeper idle states will be added in the future. Signed-off-by: Robert Lee --- arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/a

[PATCH v5 1/7] ARM: imx: Modify IMX_IO_P2V macro

A change is needed in the IMX_IO_P2V macro to allow all imx5 platforms to use common definitions when accessing registers of peripherals on the AIPS2 bus. With this change, IMX_IO_P2V(MX50_AIPS2_BASE_ADDR) == IMX_IO_P2V(MX51_AIPS2_BASE_ADDR) == IMX_IO_P2V(MX53_AIPS2_BASE_ADDR). This change was te

[PATCH v5 0/7] cleanup imx5 idle, add imx5/6 cpuidle

Cleanup up imx5 idle code and enable imx5 low powe idle for imx53. Add common imx cpuidle initialization functionality and add a i.MX5 and i.MX6Q platform cpuidle implementation. Based on v3.4 plus recently submitted/accepted MACHINE_INIT late_initcall patch series: http://www.spinics.net/lists

[PATCH v5 2/7] ARM: imx: Add comments to tzic_enable_waker()

Add additional comments to the tzic_enable_wake() funciton to clarify its intended usage. Signed-off-by: Robert Lee --- arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c index 98308ec..a45dbea 100644 --- a/arch

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Andy Green wrote: > On 11/05/12 08:27, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > >>  4. in between RCs, we only move mainline on our linux-linaro release >> baseline forward if we see a working tracking build that wouldn't drop >> any topics that already made i

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33:47AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > >like Andy, I am a bit concerned that we merge the android stuff > >into the linaro-core and that we get android candies in 'vanilla' > >kernel. can't we (shouldn't we) have -android on top of -core and > >pull -android only into 'andro

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/17/2012 09:00 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 18/05/12 09:49, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hey Andrey, Zach, So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree re-adds some items like earlysuspend

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/21/2012 03:27 AM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: hi, On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andy Green > wrote: So I just wanted to check first with folks to make sure there are no objections to merging in the -compat changes, and that the

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

Greetings, Changes since last Friday, May 18: * new ubuntu-sauce topic added * new umm_fixes topic added (one patch from the Samsung LT to fix kernel panic while booting Android on Origen board) * the tree has been moved from v3.4-rc7 to v3.4 release Moving to v3.4 release caused one conflict

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 21/05/12 18:27, Somebody in the thread at some point said: hi, On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andy Green mailto:andy.gr...@linaro.org>> wrote: So I just wanted to check first with folks to make sure there are no objections to merging in the -compat changes, and that the tim

Re: [RFC PATCH v1] AudiVal (Audio Validation Suite for Linux)

On 17 May 2012 00:12, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote: > > > On 17 May 2012 01:35, Paul Larson wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora < >> harsh.b...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 16 May 2012 09:38, Paul Larson wrote: >>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tom Gall

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

hi, On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andy Green wrote: > So I just wanted to check first with folks to make sure there are no >> objections to merging in the -compat changes, and that the timing of >> merging in these changes isn't problematic (I can happily hold off till >> this months release

Re: 12.05 linux-linaro kernel tree

On 05/18/2012 10:57 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Samsung LT's topics: > topic/base topic/core topic/bl topic/dt topic/fb topic/pd topic/s2ram > topic/asv_cpufreq topic/led topic/dummy_reg topic/gadget topic/touch > topic/wlan topic/audio topic/hdmi topic/mfc topic/mali > topic/cma_origen topic/and