Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 10:17 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: >> On 03/27/2012 12:50 AM, John Stultz wrote: >>> So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally >>> gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for >>> the lina

Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On 03/28/2012 10:08 AM, Turquette, Mike wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Saravana Kannan >>  wrote: >>> I think there is still a problem with not being able to differentiate >>> between pre-change recalc and post-change recalc. Th

Re: [Linaro-validation] Toolchain builds in LAVA

On 29 March 2012 04:20, Paul Larson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Stubbs > wrote: >> >> On 28/03/12 03:26, Michael Hope wrote: >>> >>> Hi there.  The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five >>> Panda boards can't keep up.  Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the >

Re: [Linaro-validation] Toolchain builds in LAVA

On 28/03/12 16:20, Paul Larson wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Stubbs mailto:andrew.stu...@linaro.org>> wrote: This surprised me, because I thought it was using the same rootfs you had on the ursa boards, but I've not had time to do anything about it yet. Looks like s

Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On 03/23/2012 04:28 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Saravana Kannan >>  wrote: >>> On 03/23/2012 03:32 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: >>> How does a child (or grand child) clock (not a driver using the clock) >>>

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 06:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Sorry, there's a bug in the ubuntu config, CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR should be 32768, not 0. Thanks! I'll make sure that gets fixed. -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/27/2012 12:50 AM, John Stultz wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this for 12.04, a

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/27/2012 01:48 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote: Hi John, On 26 March 2012 20:20, John Stultz > wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro ke

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 28 March 2012 13:07, Andy Green wrote: > On 03/27/2012 04:48 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > > Is there a recommended way of generating a config fragment for a board? > > > > Currently, the vexpress config is quite large and its origin is unknown > > to the LT. If I remove

Re: [Linaro-validation] Toolchain builds in LAVA

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 28/03/12 03:26, Michael Hope wrote: > >> Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five >> Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the >> toolchain build process a bit more... >> > > As you know

Re: Toolchain builds in LAVA

On 28/03/12 03:26, Michael Hope wrote: Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the toolchain build process a bit more... As you know, I've been doing some experiments with this over the last few months.

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 09:36 -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 03/27/2012 06:40 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:20 -0700, John Stultz wrote: > >> I suspect we'll need an ubuntu specific fragment as well as all the > >> other board fragments. > > The Ubuntu packaging scripts

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/27/2012 12:50 AM, John Stultz wrote: > So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally > gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for > the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this for 12.04, and > doing so early so we can make sure tha

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/27/2012 04:48 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > Is there a recommended way of generating a config fragment for a board? > > Currently, the vexpress config is quite large and its origin is unknown > to the LT. If I remove the linaro-base.conf entries from our config, we > sti

Re: jenkins really broken right now

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012, Alexander Sack wrote: > The builds went through _after_ i disabled the git proxy > setting. Before that kernel_cloud builds failed after we shut down the > old instance. Right; and the proxy setting was also bogusly pointing at the internal EC2 IP which is why it kept point

Re: jenkins really broken right now

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:05:21 +0300 Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:06:53 -0600 > John Rigby wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Loïc Minier > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, John Rigby wrote: > > >> Looks like initial git clones always fail.  I tried

Re: [PATCH] Regulator: anatop-regulator: patching to device-tree property "reg".

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:54:01PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" > > Change "reg" to "anatop-reg-offset" due to there is a warning of handling no > size field in reg. > > This patch also adds the missing device-tree binding documentation. Applied, thank

Re: jenkins really broken right now

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:05:21PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:06:53 -0600 > John Rigby wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Loïc Minier > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, John Rigby wrote: > > >> Looks like initial git clones always fail.  I t

Re: jenkins really broken right now

Hello, On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:06:53 -0600 John Rigby wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Loïc Minier > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, John Rigby wrote: > >> Looks like initial git clones always fail.  I tried a simple job > >> that just trys to run git and it fails. > > > >  Alexander n

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 09:36 -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 03/27/2012 06:40 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > Finally, where can I find links to any docs on config fragments? I > > started trying to create a fragment for vexpress which just contained: > > > > CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS=y > > CONFIG_ARCH

Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On 03/23/2012 04:28 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 03/23/2012 03:32 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: .recalc_rate serves two purposes: first it recalculates the rate after the rate has changed and you pass in a new parent_rate argument. The sec

Re: [Linaro-validation] Toolchain builds in LAVA

On 28 Mar 2012, at 04:06, Paul Larson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five > Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the > toolchain build process a bit more... > > Mike Hudson a