On 11 March 2012 09:41, Sundar wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> I am new here; so please bear with my questions/doubts :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
> wrote:
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using frequency scaling up/down
On 13 March 2012 09:24, Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 04:36 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This codes uses the generic linux thermal layer and creates a bridge
>> between temperature sensors, linux thermal framework and cooling devices
>> for samsung exynos platform. This layer recieves
Hi Durgadoss,
Thanks for the detailed review.
On 12 March 2012 16:21, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> Thanks for keeping this up. And Sorry for late reply.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Amit Daniel
>> Kachhap
>> Sent: Saturda
On 03/03/2012 04:36 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This codes uses the generic linux thermal layer and creates a bridge
> between temperature sensors, linux thermal framework and cooling devices
> for samsung exynos platform. This layer recieves or monitor the
> temperature from the sensor and in
Hi Mike,
Can I suggest/we discuss that we support fractional (i.e. represented
by fixed point value with integer and fractional part) dividers in the
common divider clock case, simplistically just adding a divider
fractional width and shifting all the calculations by it (and fixing
the "maxdiv" ca
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> > Hi Mike,
>> >
>> > I was about to give my tested-by when I decided to test the set_rate
>> > function. Unfortunately
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Nicolas Pitre
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm working on getting out of tree support for the NXP LPC31xx
>> >>
On 03/12/2012 03:58 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 03/10/2012 01:54 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> Many platforms support simple gateable clocks, fixed-rate clocks,
>>> adjustable divider clocks and multi-parent multiplexer clocks.
>>>
>>> Thi
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> I'm working on getting out of tree support for the NXP LPC31xx
> >> ARM926EJS based CPUs ready for submission. Everything was worki
Len and Andrew,
Please consider this an official merge request of this cpuidle
patchset for v3.4.
There were two small conflicts Stephen Rothwell found when merging to
linux-next. The first conflict is with patch 1/9 in the
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c file which is trivially to resolve. I'm
told
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I'm working on getting out of tree support for the NXP LPC31xx
>> ARM926EJS based CPUs ready for submission. Everything was working fine
>> on v3.2 but I lost the ability to boot with v3.3.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 03/10/2012 01:54 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Many platforms support simple gateable clocks, fixed-rate clocks,
>> adjustable divider clocks and multi-parent multiplexer clocks.
>>
>> This patch introduces basic clock types for the above-men
On 03/10/2012 01:54 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Many platforms support simple gateable clocks, fixed-rate clocks,
> adjustable divider clocks and multi-parent multiplexer clocks.
>
> This patch introduces basic clock types for the above-mentioned hardware
> which share some common characteristics.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm working on getting out of tree support for the NXP LPC31xx
> ARM926EJS based CPUs ready for submission. Everything was working fine
> on v3.2 but I lost the ability to boot with v3.3. The boot failure is
> very early in the boot process. I did a
I'm working on getting out of tree support for the NXP LPC31xx
ARM926EJS based CPUs ready for submission. Everything was working fine
on v3.2 but I lost the ability to boot with v3.3. The boot failure is
very early in the boot process. I did a bisect and came up with:
[6ee723a6570a897208b76ab3e9a4
Define dt bindings for the ti-omap-hsmmc, and adapt
the driver to extract data (which was earlier passed as
platform_data) from device tree.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
Acked-by: Rob Herring
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt | 33 +
drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
Add omap mmc related device tree data for OMAP3.
Currenly limited to only omap3-beagle board.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts | 14 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 16
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
The series adds device tree support for OMAP hsmmc
driver.
Changes in V2:
-1- Minor fixes based on comments from Grant.
-2- Added a seperate compatible for omap3.
-3- Added a new binding "ti,needs-special-reset"
to handle some mmc modules which need special
softreset sequence.
-4- Updated board dt
Add omap mmc related device tree data for OMAP4.
Currenly limited to only omap4-panda and omap4-sdp
boards.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda.dts | 22 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-sdp.dts | 24
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap
When booting with Device tree, the omap_hsmmc driver does not
program the pbias cell (inside OMAP control module) during
a regulator voltage change.
In case of non-dt boot, this is handled using callbacks
from within platform_data and implemented in machine code.
To be able to do this with device t
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I was about to give my tested-by when I decided to test the set_rate
> > function. Unfortunately this is broken for several reasons. I'll try
> > to come up
Hi Amit,
Thanks for keeping this up. And Sorry for late reply.
> -Original Message-
> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Amit Daniel
> Kachhap
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 4:36 PM
> To: linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:13:08AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Anatop is an integrated regulator inside i.MX6 SoC.
> There are 3 digital regulators which controls PU, CORE (ARM), and SOC.
> And 3 analog regulators which controls 1P1, 2P5, 3P0 (USB).
On 03/10/2012 07:52 PM, Chenglie He wrote:
> I am doing the suspend and resume of s3cfb on exynos. the clk_on and
> clk_off just failed. I think this is a related issue.
>
Without this patch, the probe for s3cfb driver itself fails - hence what
you are seeing must be different.
> On 29 February 2
hi,
Where does XBMC output its video stream? to X11/fb? or other?
thanks!
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Tom Gall wrote:
> For the 12.01 cycle the Linaro Platforms team is pleased to announce
> the availability of the new linarotv-xbmc based image. This combines
> the xbmc media server p
25 matches
Mail list logo