Hey,
As usual, here it goes the announcement of the 12.02 RC images. This
time it's later than usual because we had an issue with our builder
(offspring), but seems to be all solved now (thanks to Fathi).
This release includes a newer version of Unity (2d and 3d), XBMC and
for Pandaboard's OpenGL
W dniu 21.02.2012 04:37, Matt Sealey pisze:
I'm kind of languishing in gcc 4.4 hell right now and would quite like
an updated toolchain for 4.6.2 or thereabouts (synced with the 2012.12
Linaro release). Is this available as a package or PPA somewhere or am
I going to spend the night compilercomp
Hi kukjin Kim,
I was on travel for elc and linaro conferences so little late for
replying. Thanks for testing these patches.
I just submitted the V6 series of the cpuidle patchset. I rebased it
against the 3.3-rc4 kernel version. I also tested it for SMDKV310
(evt1) and Origen (evt1.1) boards and
Hi guys,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:29 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>>> I'm having trouble building the Thumb2 kernel on, I actually believe
>>> this same code worked some time ago before a toolchain
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:19 -0600, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Would you get Andrey setup to push to android.git.linaro.org?
>
> We should name it
>
> kernel/kwg.git
>
> Sound good with everyone?
Why not reuse the existing kernel/linaro-android.git ?
thanks
-john
__
Paul,
Would you get Andrey setup to push to android.git.linaro.org?
We should name it
kernel/kwg.git
Sound good with everyone?
On 17 February 2012 12:16, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The tree is here:
> git://git.linaro.org/people/ynk/linux-linaro-tracking.git
> branch: linaro-and
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:03 PM, C.A, Subramaniam
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Wookey wrote:
>> +++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]:
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey wrote:
>>> Would there be a buildroot like setup? Like Wookey mentioned size does
>>> matter.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey wrote:
>> Would there be a buildroot like setup? Like Wookey mentioned size does
>> matter.
>
> No, if you want to use buildroot, use buildroot (or openbric
+++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey wrote:
> Would there be a buildroot like setup? Like Wookey mentioned size does matter.
No, if you want to use buildroot, use buildroot (or openbricks, or
yocto, or OE). Debian/Ubuntu are binary distros and
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Fathi Boudra [2012-02-20 09:34 -0800]:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 20 February 2012 08:42, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> > During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
>> > nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. O
On Feb 20, 2012 4:31 PM, "Catalin Marinas" wrote:
>
> On 16 February 2012 18:14, viresh kumar wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Catalin Marinas
> > wrote:
> >> The DMA API implementation on ARM takes care of the cache cleaning and
> >> invalidating.
> >
> > I believe that this is the r
On Feb 20, 2012 11:27 PM, "Russell King - ARM Linux"
wrote:
>
> I hope it's now clear why we need to run over the buffer twice.
Thanks Russell.
Got it now.
--
Viresh
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailma
+++ Fathi Boudra [2012-02-20 09:34 -0800]:
> Hi
>
> On 20 February 2012 08:42, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> > During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> > nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
> > course I said Android, but a lot of people actual
"V, Aneesh" wrote:
> I agree that not marking the assembly functions ' %function' is a problem
> in the code, so it's not a critical bug. But I would've been happier if
> the linker refused to link it rather than branching with the wrong
> instruction. Isn't that a problem?
Well, if the target s
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:48:56AM -0800, viresh kumar wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2012 4:31 PM, "Catalin Marinas" wrote:
> >
> > On 16 February 2012 18:14, viresh kumar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Catalin Marinas
> > > wrote:
> > >> The DMA API implementation on ARM takes care of the
Hi
On 20 February 2012 08:42, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
> course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
> Linux platform where they can easil
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
> course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
> Linux platform where they can eas
Hi Zach,
On 02/20/2012 09:42 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
> course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
> Linux platform where they can eas
We have the developer image. That's exactly it's purpose.
http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/linaro-o-developer/
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to bui
On 20 févr. 2012, at 08:42, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
> course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
> Linux platform where they can easil
On 20 February 2012 16:42, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
> nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff.
Nano and then install the packages you actually need on top of that?
-- PMM
__
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
Linux platform where they can easily recompile what they need to hack
on, add their own libs an
Hello,
As the result of implementation of
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android-infrastructure/+spec/build-config-in-git
,
android-build.linaro.org now can indirectly fetch build config stored
in a git repository. To achieve that, bootstrap config (as specified
in android-build.linaro.o
Hello,
Ok, this has been fixed now, sun-java6 packages are installed from
local mirror on android-build, building capability is restored.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android-infrastructure/+bug/936990 is
opened to track switching to OpenJDK, awaiting Android team response to
that.
Also, it
On 16 February 2012 18:14, viresh kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
>> The DMA API implementation on ARM takes care of the cache cleaning and
>> invalidating.
>
> I believe that this is the reason why we have cache re-invalidation
> (we invalidated
> it in d
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:27:21AM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:49:21PM +0530, Amit wrote:
> > I am not able to install any packages related to linaro for example
> > when I tried that below command
> >
> > sudo add-apt-repository ppa:linaro-maintainers/toolch
Hi,
the third way is to go to the keyserver.ubuntu.com website, search for your
keyid and copy the key to a text file for import locally...
1. go to
http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF1FCBACA7BE1F97B
2. copy the GPG block to a text file: key.txt
3. sudo apt-key add k
27 matches
Mail list logo
