[PATCH] leds-lp5521: additional platform data and attributes

2012-01-05 Thread Kim, Milo
* Changes of lp5521_platform_data > 'update_config' is added > 'name' is added Value of CONFIG register(Addr 08h) and name of led channels are dependant on the project. So these fields have been added in lp5521_platform_data. > led pattern data lp5521 has autonomous operation mode without external

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] EEYNOS: Add SMDK5250 board support

2012-01-05 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Chander Kashyap, On 5 January 2012 19:31, Chander Kashyap wrote: > Hi Minkyu Kang, > > On 5 January 2012 12:13, Minkyu Kang wrote: >> Dear Chander Kashyap, >> >> On 27 December 2011 17:48, Chander Kashyap >> wrote: > >  Torsten Koschorrek > >        scb9328         ARM920T (i.MXL

Re: [PATCH V6 3/7] cpufreq: OMAP: remove loops_per_jiffy recalculate for smp

2012-01-05 Thread Richard Zhao
Hi Kevin, Could you please look at and ack the patch if possible? Sorry, I didn't cc you. Thanks Richard ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH V6 2/7] arm/imx: cpufreq: remove loops_per_jiffy recalculate for smp

2012-01-05 Thread Richard Zhao
Hi Sascha & Shawn, Could you look and ack the patch? Thanks Richard ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH V6 0/7] add a generic cpufreq driver

2012-01-05 Thread Richard Zhao
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 06:16:54AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > hi Russell, > > May I have your ACK, you merge it? Russell, ping > > Thanks > Richard > > ___ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradea

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] Documentation: common clk API

2012-01-05 Thread Turquette, Mike
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > Tiny, tiny typo... > > On 11 Dec 13, Mike Turquette wrote: > >> +clk_set_rate deserves a special mention because it is more complex than >> +the other operations.  There are three key concepts to the common >> +clk_set_rate implementation: >>

Snowball bugs - New process announcement

2012-01-05 Thread anmar.ou...@linaro.org
Hello All: Now that we have tightly integrated Linaro and Igloocommunity [1], it is time for us to tweak our internal process to accommodate this change. As of today, the following applies: 1. The igloocommunity [2] Launchpad project will replace the linaro-landing-team-ste [3] one. This will app

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Joey STANFORD
Hi, > I'm not sure adding one more service like brainstorm will help us enough > to offset the added pain of further context-switching an already small > team. Is there really that much demand that isn't finding its way to us? We overlapped on emails. That's were I was going with my trailer to L

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Joey STANFORD
Howdy, > will >  we commit to implementing x things per cycle from brainstorm.linaro.org >  if we start advertizing it?  The worst thing would be to give people a >  place to suggest work and then ... ignore it. Right on. We'll need to implement some sort of social contract for this. I'd want to

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:51:01AM -0700, Joey Stanford wrote: > > I like brainstorm, though on the Ubuntu side I know it's been a struggle > > lately to maintain, keep moderators and idea reviewers. > > I'm hoping that since we're a smaller group that you and Michael can > keep up with it (like

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Joey STANFORD
> I like brainstorm, though on the Ubuntu side I know it's been a struggle > lately to maintain, keep moderators and idea reviewers. I'm hoping that since we're a smaller group that you and Michael can keep up with it (like ask.linaro.org). >  It's also my > understanding that the code base is

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Joey STANFORD
Hi Patrik, Yep, since Linaro has a Google Apps account we could indeed use Google Moderator. e.g. https://www.google.com/moderator/#15/e=1c111&t=1c111.40&f=1c111.5df32a I have large preference to the ideastorm code that brainstorm uses (able to put a branding/theming on it, openid enabled so u

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] Documentation: common clk API

2012-01-05 Thread Amit Kucheria
Tiny, tiny typo... On 11 Dec 13, Mike Turquette wrote: > +clk_set_rate deserves a special mention because it is more complex than > +the other operations. There are three key concepts to the common > +clk_set_rate implementation: > + > +1) recursively traversing up the clk tree and changing clk

[ACTIVITY] Graphics WG weekly report - wk01.2012 (20120102 - 20120106)

2012-01-05 Thread Ilias Biris
Dashboard for the release and news are all in https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/WeeklyReport Last meeting minutes: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2012-01-04 Highlights: Not much to highlight on - apart from working for the release 12.01 aft

Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 2/3] thermal: exynos4: Register the tmu sensor with the thermal interface layer

2012-01-05 Thread Donggeun Kim
Actually, the TMU driver is closely related to thermal layer. I think it's okay to move it to the thermal. Thanks. -Donggeun On 2012년 01월 04일 19:14, Amit Kachhap wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > The main idea of this work is to leave the current userspace based > notification scheme and add the kernel b

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012, Joey STANFORD wrote: > http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ I love the concept and implementation of brainstorm -- +1 -- but will we commit to implementing x things per cycle from brainstorm.linaro.org if we start advertizing it? The worst thing would be to give people a place

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Amber Graner
On 4 January 2012 18:18, Joey STANFORD wrote: > Hi Gang, > > During some roadmapping work today the discussion of capturing and > voting on ideas for Linaro came up. The idea was to possibly recreate > a Linaro version of this > > http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ > > for everyone to contribute to.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] EEYNOS: Add SMDK5250 board support

2012-01-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Chander Kashyap, In message you wrote: > > > No need to reuse the code, if SoCs are different. > > If need, please separate the functions. > > Yes, though SoC's are different, the functionality in clock.c is > similar. The only difference is the clock name in the clock structure > for Exyn

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] EEYNOS: Add SMDK5250 board support

2012-01-05 Thread Chander Kashyap
Hi Minkyu Kang, On 5 January 2012 12:13, Minkyu Kang wrote: > Dear Chander Kashyap, > > On 27 December 2011 17:48, Chander Kashyap wrote: >  Torsten Koschorrek >        scb9328         ARM920T (i.MXL) > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/e

Re: RFC: Ideas for Linaro

2012-01-05 Thread Patrik Ryd
We could just use https://www.google.com/moderator/#0. /Patrik On 5 January 2012 00:18, Joey STANFORD wrote: > Hi Gang, > > During some roadmapping work today the discussion of capturing and > voting on ideas for Linaro came up. The idea was to possibly recreate > a Linaro version of this > >