On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> ##
> ## ez-pine-gpg v0.4h ## http://Business-PHP.com/opensource/ez-pine-gpg/
> ## Tue Dec 6 22:27:12 EST 2011 ## xanadu.home
> ##
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:24:40 -0600, Paul Larson wrote:
> This mostly affects the server side components, yes. I'm open to the idea
> of continuing packages for the client-side tools, if it would be useful to
> others.
I think continuing to package the client side tools would be good (I use
the pa
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:31:12 -0700, Joey STANFORD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the code for this...
>
> Is this something that should be on the Linaro GIT server?
>
> git://github.com/zyga/pip.git
>
>
> It's called as git clone git://github.com/zyga/pip.git -b develop
> $LAVA_PREFIX/$LAV
Hi all,
I would like to just mention to anyone that's interested that Genesi's
Ahmed Ammar and Steev Klimaszewski, managed to get Android ICS running
on the EfikaMX Smarttop (no Smartbook yet, working on it), along with
3D acceleration. Details are here:
http://www.powerdeveloper.org/forums/viewt
On 11/24/2011 03:32 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
Just to let you all know, due to the ongoing multiarch work, it is not
possible to cross-compile
relatively complex packages in ubuntu. For example, following the
instructions[1], Firefox. While
building on oneiric, patched packages from the linaro-
Hi there,
The linux-arm-kernel[1] project on patches.l.o was using the following source
tree
http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm.git
to track committed patches, but fetching that repo seems to have become
ridiculously slow, causing git to take ages to update
We only have things in the PPA right now, so SRUs aren't needed anyway.
Are you talking about continuing packages for everything, or just for the
client side tools?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> This mostly affects
Hi,
I've just built the first RC of the Android 11.12 toolchain.
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/toolchain-4.6-2011.12/
The big news is that it can successfully compile ICS, and the
resulting ICS build actually works.
Earlier workarounds like linking a couple of files w/ th
Tom,
I can do the resolutions etc. What format do you want, PNG, JPG, GIF or
other? Can you animate the dots? If so, how best to do it?
Thanks
Steve
On 5 December 2011 18:51, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Steve Taylor
> wrote:
> >
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> This mostly affects the server side components, yes. I'm open to the idea
> of continuing packages for the client-side tools, if it would be useful to
> others.
>
> At best we would continue packaging for the ubuntu development releases,
but n
Hi,
I was looking at the code for this...
Is this something that should be on the Linaro GIT server?
git://github.com/zyga/pip.git
It's called as git clone git://github.com/zyga/pip.git -b develop
$LAVA_PREFIX/$LAVA_INSTANCE/src/pip
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> This
(2011年12月06日 18:45), Amit Kachhap wrote:
> +struct anatop_handle_list {
> + u32 count;
> + acpi_namespace_node * handles[ANATOP_ACPI_MAX_HANDLES];
>
>
> Is this handle used any where ?
>
>
Hi Amit,
No. It is not using at all.
As you said this driver needs a lot of cl
Hi all,
this mail did not follow the proper EOL process that is currently discussed.
In particular, this notice should not have been send out without explaining
and discussing our new (RFC) EOL that explicitly encourage community
maintenance of boards first.
So, please consider this mail void an
This mostly affects the server side components, yes. I'm open to the idea
of continuing packages for the client-side tools, if it would be useful to
others.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Alexandros Frantzis <
> alexa
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:52 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 December 2011 10:34, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:47 +, Stephen Doel wrote:
> >> ** Following feedback at previous Linaro Connect events, the registration
> >> process now includes a) registration on Laun
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Alexandros Frantzis <
alexandros.frant...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > The deployment of LAVA using Ubuntu packages is deprecated in favor of
> the
> > dedicated LAVA deployment tool [1]. LAVA installation is
On 6 December 2011 10:34, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:47 +, Stephen Doel wrote:
>> ** Following feedback at previous Linaro Connect events, the registration
>> process now includes a) registration on Launchpad so you only have to go
>> through the registration process
On 6 December 2011 10:34, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:47 +, Stephen Doel wrote:
>> ** Following feedback at previous Linaro Connect events, the registration
>> process now includes a) registration on Launchpad so you only have to go
>> through the registration process
Amba core assumes the pclk to be named as apb_pclk. During device probe,
it tries to get that clock and enable that. When PM_RUNTIME is enabled,
dma clock is not explicitly enabled in pl330_probe, which causes device
probe to fail. Adding a clkdev entry for apb_pclk for mdma1 fixes the
problem.
Th
amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable()
for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need
to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again.
In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime
functions, t
Hi,
When PM_RUNTIME is enabled, PL330 probe fails because of some
mismatch in pm_runtime calls. This patchset fixes those issues.
This patch is based on Kukjin's for-next branch and tested on
EXYNOS4 based Origen board.
d3d936c "Merge branch 'samsung-fixes-2' into for-next"
Tushar Behera (2):
T
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:47 +, Stephen Doel wrote:
> ** Following feedback at previous Linaro Connect events, the registration
> process now includes a) registration on Launchpad so you only have to go
> through the registration process once b) ability to save and complete later
> c) e-mail wit
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:15:56PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > But I'd propose that we instead increase the size of struct clk.rate to be
> > s64:
> >
> > s64 clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, s64 desired_rate);
> > int clk_set_rate(struc
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> For example, here's a trivial implementation for rate recalculation for a
> integer divider clock node (that can't be handled with a right shift):
>
> s64 div(struct clk *clk, u32 div) {
> if (clk->flags & CLK_PARENT_RATE_MAX_U32)
>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> The deployment of LAVA using Ubuntu packages is deprecated in favor of the
> dedicated LAVA deployment tool [1]. LAVA installation is tested and supported
> on Ubuntu host from version 10.10 to 11.10 (Maverick to Oneiric) [2].
>
> Fro
The deployment of LAVA using Ubuntu packages is deprecated in favor of the
dedicated LAVA deployment tool [1]. LAVA installation is tested and supported
on Ubuntu host from version 10.10 to 11.10 (Maverick to Oneiric) [2].
>From 11.12 cycle, the following conditions will be applied:
* Linaro Vali
26 matches
Mail list logo
