Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] common clk framework

2011-11-25 Thread Shawn Guo
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:42PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote: [...] > .the most notable change is the removal of struct clk_hw. Happy to see that. > This extra > layer of abstraction is only necessary if we want hide the definition of > struct clk from platform code. Many developers express

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] clk: Kconfig: add entry for HAVE_CLK_PREPARE

2011-11-25 Thread Shawn Guo
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:43PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote: > The common clk framework provides clk_prepare and clk_unprepare > implementations. Create an entry for HAVE_CLK_PREPARE so that > GENERIC_CLK can select it. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette > --- Acked-by: Shawn Guo Regards, S

Re: Cross Compiling Firefox with Multiarch

2011-11-25 Thread Riku Voipio
On 25 November 2011 11:41, Riku Voipio wrote: > I've uploaded a new libtasn which doesn't compress NEWS file as > workaround. I'm also updating the firefox in repository to 8.0, > the demo was based on 7.0. I'll update when all the changes > have landed. Which should be now (or at least in a few

Re: Cross Compiling Firefox with Multiarch

2011-11-25 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi, Thanks for trying out. On 25 November 2011 00:50, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > Out of curiosity and having a few minutes right now, I tried following > the instructions in an oneiric chroot on an amd64 host and I hit the > following issues. > 1. /etc/apt.conf.d does not really exist. so I

Re: [RFC 1/3] pinctrl: add a driver for the OMAP pinmux

2011-11-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > We should probably pass over > the static board specific mapping as platform_data to the pinmux device > and make it be part of struct pinctrl_dev. Then new driver instances > can have their own pctldev->mapping and we can support both platf

Re: [PATCH v2] S5PC2XX: Rename S5pc2XX to exynos4

2011-11-25 Thread Kyungmin Park
Hi, New Cortex-A15 also uses the armv7. So it's better to use the exynos itself. Just remove the number 4. Thank you, Kyungmin Park On 11/25/11, Chander Kashyap wrote: > As per new conventions Samsung SoC's are named as Exynos. > Cortex-A9 based Soc's are named as exynos4. s5pc2xx is cortex-A9