Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 17 November 2011 14:51, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> As per new conventions Samsung SoC's are named as Exynos.
> Cortex-A9 based Soc's are named as exynos4. s5pc2xx is cortex-A9
> based, hence renamed to exynos4. This is done as per kernel
> naming convetions.
>
> Similerly r
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 8:51 PM
> To: Tony Lindgren
> Cc: Linus Walleij; Thomas Abraham; Nayak, Rajendra; linux-
> o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@
* Russell King - ARM Linux [23 14:07]:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:55:19AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > What else are you aware of that is really needed early for clocks other
> > than clockevent?
>
> TWD will lose its auto-calibration. Then there's various clock source
> and clock event
Friends,
The Linaro Android team has been busy and folded the ICS build for the
Snowball board in their build system:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/staging-snowball/#build=84
Best regards,
Mathieu.
___
linaro-dev mailing lis
On 11/24/2011 03:18 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
As I mentioned in the talk I gave at Connect about lt-tools, the fact that
we're both tracking near Linus HEAD allows us to casually combine the trees
for the first time if we can arrange for our basis to be relatively close.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:55:19AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> What else are you aware of that is really needed early for clocks other
> than clockevent?
TWD will lose its auto-calibration. Then there's various clock source
and clock event implementations. These all call for the clk API to be
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:50:58 +, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 23 November 2011 09:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 23 November 2011 00:48, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> > wrote:
> >> I've been working on testing images under QEMU with the lava-dispatcher
> >> (mostly this is preparation for testing A15
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 05:40 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> +void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
>> +{
>> + if (!clk)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(clk->prepare_count == 0))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + i
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 11:13 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:57:41AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
Ah, comments like this warm my heart.
Come on, no abusing the kobject code please, if have problems with how
>>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 05:40 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> +Below is the common struct clk definition from include/linux.clk.h. It
>
> Typo
Will fix in V4.
>
>> +is modified slightly for brevity:
>> +
>> +struct clk {
>> + const char
* Mark Brown [23 10:34]:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:55:19AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux [23 09:31]:
>
> > > Keep the clk API as a fundamental thing which should be initialized early
> > > so we don't have to invent new clk APIs to get around its unavailab
On 22 November 2011 22:46, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Thanks to the work of Angus and Tushar a second Landing Team has established
> a tracking tree, for Samsung Origen. They're using the same lt-tools
> management scripts I use to handle the various trees in TI Landing Team.
>
> As I mentioned
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:55:19AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux [23 09:31]:
> > Keep the clk API as a fundamental thing which should be initialized early
> > so we don't have to invent new clk APIs to get around its unavailability.
> What else are you aware of tha
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:47:16PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> For the first 2 patches (1/4 and 2/4) I have dropped
> Acks from Mark, since they have changed to some extent
> from the last post and retained the Acks recieved on the
> last 2 patches (3/4 and 4/4) as they remain unchanged.
Looks
* Russell King - ARM Linux [23 09:31]:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > ..let's plan on getting rid of the early usage of clocks instead so
> > you don't have the issue of deferring stuff.
>
> No - we have too many platforms already using them early to do a
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:47:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> + struct device_node *regnode = NULL;
> + char prop_name[32]; /* 32 is max size of property name */
There ought to be a #define for that though I can't see one right now -
this can't be the only place where we need to do st
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> ..let's plan on getting rid of the early usage of clocks instead so
> you don't have the issue of deferring stuff.
No - we have too many platforms already using them early to do a change
like this - and to do such a change will force
Hi Mike,
* Greg KH [22 10:51]:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:57:41AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Ah, comments like this warm my heart.
> > >
> > > Come on, no abusing the kobject code please, if have problems with how
> > > the kernel core works, and it doesn't do things you want it to,
Op 22 nov. 2011, om 18:54 heeft Tony Lindgren het volgende geschreven:
> * Linus Walleij [22 03:30]:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Thomas Abraham
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 November 2011 19:27, Linus Walleij wrote:
Maybe I'm mistaken about the device tree ambitions, but
I w
On 23 November 2011 09:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 November 2011 00:48, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> I've been working on testing images under QEMU with the lava-dispatcher
>> (mostly this is preparation for testing A15 using a fast model, but it's
>> interesting in its own right too).
>
Hi,
I am trying to enable the second core (For test purposes I am running my code
from u-boot). For that I wrote address of routine for the second core at
address U8500_BACKUPRAM0_BASE + UX500_CPU1_JUMPADDR_OFFSET and 0xA1FEED01 at
U8500_BACKUPRAM0_BASE + UX500_CPU1_WAKEMAGIC_OFFSET . But nothi
On 11/21/2011 05:40 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Provide documentation for the common clk structures and APIs. This code
can be found in drivers/clk/ and include/linux/clk.h.
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette
---
Documentation/clk.txt | 312 +
1 file
On 11/21/2011 05:40 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..12c9994
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -0,0 +1,538 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2010-2011 Canonical Ltd
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 Linaro Ltd
+ *
+ * This program
On 11/22/2011 11:13 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:57:41AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
Ah, comments like this warm my heart.
Come on, no abusing the kobject code please, if have problems with how
the kernel core works, and it doesn't do things you want it to, then why
not change
On 16:28 Tue 22 Nov , Stephen Warren wrote:
> Tony Lindgren wrote at Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:54 AM:
> > * Linus Walleij [22 03:30]:
> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Thomas Abraham
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 17 November 2011 19:27, Linus Walleij
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
On 23 November 2011 00:48, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> I've been working on testing images under QEMU with the lava-dispatcher
> (mostly this is preparation for testing A15 using a fast model, but it's
> interesting in its own right too).
Ah, this is cool, more automated testing of QEMU would d
26 matches
Mail list logo
