On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:26:49PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:59:19AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Richard Zhao
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:59PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > >> From: Jeremy Kerr
> > >>
> >
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> Hey Amit,
> In updating our tree to 3.1, I noticed the SCHED_MC config option
> dropped out of the savedefconfig and it doesn't seem to be found in the
> arm Kconfig.
>
> Is that expected? Or are there out of tree patches that provide th
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:16:30 +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've done a stealth deploy (stealth as in "no links point to this page")
> of the first cut of the kernel ci view I've been working on:
>
> http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/kernel-ci-views/index
I've upda
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:06:09 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 07:16 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've done a stealth deploy (stealth as in "no links point to this page")
> > of the first cut of the kernel ci view I've been working on:
> >
> > http://validation
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:14:19AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> unsigned long omap_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> {
>> struct clk *parent;
>> struct clk_hw_omap
2011/10/14 Chanho Park :
> A gpio base number of gpio_range0 is 0 and pin base number is also 0.
> Converting gpio-pin number is no problem about the gpio_range0.
> A gpio base number of gpio_range1 is 32 but pin base number is 40(not 32).
Aha, I understand now, sorry I'm too slow in the head. :-
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:59:19AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Richard Zhao
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:59PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> From: Jeremy Kerr
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> >> Signed-o
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 06:32:33PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:05:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 04:10:26PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:56PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >
> > snip essentially Mike's entire
On 14 October 2011 21:19, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 14 October 2011 16:57, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/staging-panda/#build=36
>>
>> can't launch windows, but
>>
>> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/staging-panda/#build=35
>>
On 13 October 2011 05:03, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Tony Mansson
> wrote:
>>
>> * Strict-aliasing violations in 2.3.5 have been fixed.
>
> I remember that we disabled -Werror because of various issues ... with those
> strict-aliasing
> fixes, what is left before we
I made a gcc 11.10 release build based on linaro-master-with-generic-target
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/toolchain-4.6-linaro-master-with-generic-target/
And built all Androids with the toolchain above. LEB-panda looks working
fine.
On 15 October 2011 16:56, Zach Pfeffe
11 matches
Mail list logo
