Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS4: Setup consistent dma size at boot time

2011-10-12 Thread Tushar Behera
Hi Kukjin, On Monday 12 September 2011 11:25 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Some of the boards under mach-exynos4 initialize frame-buffers for which the memory requirement is more than 2MB (Nuri board requires around 4MB, Origen requires around 2.6MB), hence the default dma pool allocation size of 2MB

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v9

2011-10-12 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:42AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > From: Linus Walleij > > This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices. > These are devices that control different aspects of package > pins. > > Currently it handles pinmuxing, i.e. assigning electronic > functions t

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v9

2011-10-12 Thread Chanho Park
> +Interaction with the GPIO subsystem > +=== > + > +The GPIO drivers may want to perform operations of various types on the same > +physical pins that are also registered as GPIO pins. > + > +Since the pin controller subsystem have its pinspace local to the pin > +c

sneak preview of kernel ci views

2011-10-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi all, I've done a stealth deploy (stealth as in "no links point to this page") of the first cut of the kernel ci view I've been working on: http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/kernel-ci-views/index It's very much an alpha-style view at the moment -- in particular the computation of th

Re: BUGREPORTED work item state

2011-10-12 Thread James Westby
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:55:24 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > Do we really need this kind detail encoded in the the state of a WI itself? > > Alternatively, we could always add a comment to the white board to document > what happened > with POSTPONED work items. I agree with Alexander here, I think

Re: Linaro CI hwpack name improvements

2011-10-12 Thread Deepak Saxena
On 12 October 2011 09:25, Dave Martin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:10:59PM +0530, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Dave Martin wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Also, what timezone is used to determine the date

Re: Linaro CI hwpack name improvements

2011-10-12 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:10:59PM +0530, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > > > >> > >> Also, what timezone is used to determine the date and time? I think we > >> should use UTC, not any lo

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: Add simple gated clock

2011-10-12 Thread Turquette, Mike
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:59PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: >> From: Jeremy Kerr >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown >> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles >> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette >> --- >> Changes since v1:

Re: [Patch 5/11] Regulator: DA9052/53 regulator support v4

2011-10-12 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
(2011年10月07日 20:20), ashishj3 wrote: > The Dialog PMIC has below featured regulators:- > DA9052-BC - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 3.6V upto 1Amp. > DA9053-AA/BX - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 2.5V upto 3Amp. > DA9052/53 - 10 Programmable LDO's High PSSR, 1% accuracy. > > This patch support all the

Re: 11.10 image changes

2011-10-12 Thread James Westby
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:14:35 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > There will be a newly released version in the PPA that will contain > the support. Until that happens bzr will the only option. However > we're getting ahead of ourselves as the new formatted images aren't in > production yet. This is just a he

RE: [PATCH] gpio/samsung: Move SoC specific codes within macro

2011-10-12 Thread Kukjin Kim
Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Grant Likely wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:59:19AM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > > > In drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c, there are certain structures > > > and functions which are not getting used if the particular > > > CPU is not selected. These code segments are mo

Re: sched: ARM: arch_scale_freq_power

2011-10-12 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 18:03 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > How do you know the task is 'small' ? > > > > I want to use cpufreq to be notified that we have a large/small cpu > load. If we have several tasks but the cpu uses the lowest frequency, > it "should" mean that we have small tasks that a

Re: Linaro CI hwpack name improvements

2011-10-12 Thread Deepti Kalakeri
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > >> >> Also, what timezone is used to determine the date and time? I think we >> should use UTC, not any local timezone. >> >> > agreed on the UTC time. > Yup its UTC time. > > > -- >

Re: 11.10 image changes

2011-10-12 Thread Dave Martin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:08:46PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > All, > > Our oneiric based images and hwpacks are shaping up in advance of the > 11.10 based release. Already you can download from > http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric. > > Some important things you'll want to be aware of. > > We'll b