so ago.
>
> There is now just one failure:
>
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/build/lt-s5pv310-natty/20111007/0/build-log.txt
>
> which is a problem with the config or the packages, as it's asking for a
> package that doesn't exist, so this is not a systemic problem, but
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:17 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
>> > predicated on renaming the top level.
>> >
>> The m
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:20:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:43:02PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Note that there's already an API from Intel which people are relatively
> > > happy with, i
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:43:02PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Note that there's already an API from Intel which people are relatively
> > happy with, it mostly just needs some fettling for kernel integration -
> > after t
(crashing as it was installing the build tool.)
That was fixed yesterday, but no-one triggered rebuilds, so they all
were fixed with the rebuild that started an hour or so ago.
There is now just one failure:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/build/lt-s5pv310-natty/20111007/0/build-log.txt
which is a
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
> wrote:
>
> > Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
> > predicated on renaming the top level.
> >
> The main reason I like having a suffix of some kind is so that it'
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby wrote:
> Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
> predicated on renaming the top level.
>
The main reason I like having a suffix of some kind is so that it's obvious
which series it's from by the filename. If someone includes
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report
for the kernel working group for the week ending 2011-10-07
== Meeting Minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-10-03
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2011-10-06
On Friday 07 October 2011, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/462076/
>
> How many of these are relevant to ARM platforms (including Android), and
> what would feature on an ARM Plumber's Wish List?
They all apply to ARM but I see these more as small annoyances not to
Yes and it has been fixed.
On 7 October 2011 19:40, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing?
>
> See, for example:
>
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt
>
> ...a similar problem seems to have
http://lwn.net/Articles/462076/
How many of these are relevant to ARM platforms (including Android), and
what would feature on an ARM Plumber's Wish List?
--
Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP
Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935
Linaro.org: Open Source Software for AR
Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing?
See, for example:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt
...a similar problem seems to have affected the recent builds for every hwpack.
Looks like some build-depends package
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report
for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2011-10-07
== Meeting Minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-10-05
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerM
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:37:15 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Thanks for the update James. Say related we have the following hwpack
> directory names:
>
> efikamx-oneiric
> igep-oneiric
> imx51-oneiric
> omap3-oneiric
> omap3-x11-base-oneiric
> overo-oneiric
> pa
Hi all,
For kernel guys and landing teams, I've posted some kernel-specific
info on mirating to Thumb-2 here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Thumb2Guide
If your kernel tree isn't building in Thumb-2 yet, please do take a look.
Let me know if you want more information on anything, o
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:46:57AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> >> >> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
> >> >> has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling it
> >> >> "ubuntu-build" would be rather confusing...
> >> >
> >> > These images are all Ubuntu based
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> > On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> >>> Also, it
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:38:35AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:45:00PM -0500, Kurt Taylor wrote:
>
> > > There are only 3 left from the list that are bounded enough to consider:
> > > 1) Compress
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:29 AM, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
>> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
>> reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
> >>
> >>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:27:38 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> on the same front I see we still redirect ubuntu-build to offspring ... can
> we flip that
> around? e.g. make offspring.l.o redirect to ubuntu-build?
Yes, just file an RT to request the change.
Thanks,
James
__
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:23:12 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 2. use directory structure matching the project group names used on
> offspring.linaro.org; e.g. natty-hwpacks, natty-images, oneiric-hwpacks,
> oneiric-Images, etc.
This would be a useful step in removing the need to request syncs from
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
> reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
> vs.
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
>
> Woul
On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
>>
>> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
>> has na
The Dialog PMIC has below featured regulators:-
DA9052-BC - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 3.6V upto 1Amp.
DA9053-AA/BX - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 2.5V upto 3Amp.
DA9052/53 - 10 Programmable LDO's High PSSR, 1% accuracy.
This patch support all the DA9052 and Da9053 regulators. The output voltage
The Dialog PMIC has below featured regulators:-
DA9052-BC - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 3.6V upto 1Amp.
DA9053-AA/BX - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 2.5V upto 3Amp.
DA9052/53 - 10 Programmable LDO's High PSSR, 1% accuracy.
This patch support all the DA9052 and Da9053 regulators. The output voltage
On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
>
> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
> has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling i
On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling it
"ubuntu-build" would be rather confusing...
> 1. mo
While compiling with s3c2410_defconfig, we receive 4 section mismatch
warnings.
Patch 1 addresses a couple of warnings related to usb_simtec_init().
Patch 2 addresses mismatch warnings in a couple of mach-*/irq.c files.
Changes for V2:
* The original patch is splitted to address to differ
usb_simtec_init() references s3c_ohci_set_platdata() which is defined
with __init attribute. Hence to remove section mismatch warning, __init
attribute is added to usb_simtec_init().
It removes following two warnigs.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1460c): Section mismatch in reference from
the functi
The structure *_irq_driver is passed as a parameter in
sysdev_driver_register(). This in turn would add this structure to a
list which may be traversed later.
Hence, even though the functions referenced through this structure have
__init attribute, we cannot possibly add __initdata attribute to it
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 13:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
> >> any reason for the lack of consistency between d
FYI, for people in Cambridge, UK next week
Reply to Jonathan Cameron (below) if you are interested in attending.
For up-to-date guidelines on creating keys, try this:
http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
Cheers
---Dave
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ralf Baechle
Date: Thu, Oc
On 7 October 2011 13:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>
>> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
>> any reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
>> v
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
> any reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
> vs.
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
>
> Would
> -Original Message-
> From: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) [mailto:paul@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 2:54 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Mark Brown; Dajun; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; l...@slimlogic.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [Patch 5/11] Regulator: D
(2011年07月06日 18:36), ashishj3 wrote:
> +static int __devinit da9052_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct da9052_regulator *regulator;
> + struct da9052 *da9052;
> + struct da9052_pdata *pdata;
> + int ret;
> +
> + regulator = kzalloc(sizeof(struct da9052
37 matches
Mail list logo
