Ubuntu build jobs are now scheduled at 16:00 UTC

Hi, Follow-up to Linaro 11.09 RC call for testing thread: > > IMO, we should stick to Monday for the RC images and call for testing. > > It gives 3 full days to collect the reports and fixes critical issues. > > Though, using autobuilt images isn't optimal. What about triggering a > > manual rebui

Re: oneiric, hwpacks + linaro-media-create

Hi Tom, On 4 October 2011 23:57, Tom Gall wrote: > Not getting any answers in #linaro. Which version of > linaro-media-create is required for oneiric based hwpacks and images? >  Should the PPA version suffice or does one need to use the latest > greatest from bzr? Latest released version should

RE: [PATCH] gpio/samsung: Move SoC specific codes within macro

Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:59:19AM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > > In drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c, there are certain structures > > and functions which are not getting used if the particular > > CPU is not selected. These code segments are moved under CPU > > specific macro

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: Add initial WM831x clock driver

On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:50:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 12:18:18PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > #define module_platform_driver(__driver) \ > > int __driver##_init(void) \ > > { \ > > return platform_driver_register(&(__driver)); \ > > } \ > > module_init(__driver

oneiric, hwpacks + linaro-media-create

Hi, Not getting any answers in #linaro. Which version of linaro-media-create is required for oneiric based hwpacks and images? Should the PPA version suffice or does one need to use the latest greatest from bzr? Thanks! -- Regards, Tom "We want great men who, when fortune frowns will not be d

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: Add initial WM831x clock driver

On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 12:18:18PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:38:58AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > No, that's not helpful. The issue isn't the device probe code itself, > > the issue is things like module unload not doing what they're supposed > > to do and leaving th

Re: [PATCH] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v8

On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > 2011/9/30 Grant Likely : > > > I'm not convinced that the sysfs approach is > > actually the right interface here (I'm certainly not a fan of the gpio > > sysfs i/f), and I'd rather not be putting in unneeded stuff until the > > user

Re: [PATCH] gpio/samsung: Move SoC specific codes within macro

On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:59:19AM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > In drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c, there are certain structures > and functions which are not getting used if the particular > CPU is not selected. These code segments are moved under CPU > specific macros to remove compilation warnings.

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: Add initial WM831x clock driver

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:38:58AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:08:36PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:27:01PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > + ret = platform_driver_register(&wm831x_clk_driver); > > > + if (ret != 0) > > > + pr_err

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:17:30AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > > + /* Query the hardware for parent and initial rate */ > > + > > + if (clk->ops->get_parent) > > + /* We don't to lock against prepare/enable here, as > > +* th

Re: BUGREPORTED work item state

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 30 September 2011 13:22, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > Hi Zach, > > > > I noticed that you introduced BUGREPORTED on Android blueprints for > > the work items. > > It raised a couple of questions: > > 1. what does BUGREPORTED means ? > > When Dav

Re: Announce: TILT tracking Androidization trees

On 10/04/2011 10:36 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi - The second branch is "tilt-android-tracking". This is our main tracking branch tilt-tracking for Panda enablement we have been running for some months combined with "linaro-androidization-__tracking" above.

Re: Announce: TILT tracking Androidization trees

Hi Andy, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Andy Green wrote: > Hi - > > TI Landing Team has added a couple of new trees to our git repo over the > weekend > > http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?**p=people/andygreen/kernel-** > tilt.git;a=summary

Please complete registration for Linaro Connect

Hi All, I'd like to remind you to complete all the registration details for Linaro Connect. These can all be found here: http://connect.linaro.org/events/event/linaro-connect-q411/#welcome As a reminder, you need to do 4 things: 1. Plan your travel - you should arrive on Sunday and leave

[ACTIVITY] Multimedia WG - Weekly Status for wk39.2011 (20110926-20110930)

Status: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/WeeklyReport Meeting notes: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Notes/2011-09-27 Highlights: - Working on 11.10 plans - Decision on the multimedia content licenses is still pending - TSC to provide guida

Announce: TILT tracking Androidization trees

Hi - TI Landing Team has added a couple of new trees to our git repo over the weekend http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/andygreen/kernel-tilt.git;a=summary Both of them track Linus HEAD, currently at 3.1-rc8. First is "linaro-androidization-tracking", this is Linus HEAD plus a set of An

[ACTIVITY] Weekly status Graphics WG - wk39.2011 (20110926-20110930)

Status: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/WeeklyReport Meeting minutes: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-09-28 == Highlights == * Planning 11.10 * Working out how to handle backlogs - details discussed about series, backlog milestones