Switch Android builds over to use the tip toolchain

2011-10-03 Thread Chao Yang
Hi, In order to switch to the new toolchain in each cycle more smoothly, it's been decided that Android builds will be using the tip toolchain until the formal toolchain is released in every month. The toolchain 4.6 daily build has already been setup, which can be found in https://android-build.li

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Turquette, Mike
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > Mike, > > On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c >> index 6db161f..e2a9719 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c >> @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ >>  static L

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Rob Herring
Mike, On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c > index 6db161f..e2a9719 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c > @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ > static LIST_HEAD(clocks); > static DEFINE_MUTEX(clocks_mutex); > > +/

Re: BUGREPORTED work item state

2011-10-03 Thread James Westby
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:48:55 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > > 2. do we need to update > > https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/WorkItemsHowto#Work_items_in_the_whiteboard > > ? > > I think we should. BUGREPORTED seemed to fill a void as David and I > were going through each item that the other fields did

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:43:09PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:31:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: [Not being many off-SoC clocks] > > I dunno, I get the impression that some of this is due to the current > > limitations of the clock API rather than due to a la

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:31:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > I dunno, I get the impression that some of this is due to the current > limitations of the clock API rather than due to a lack of clocks - > perhaps that's specific to the applications I look at, though. > applications The clk API per-

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:24:52AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 10/03/2011 09:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > This isn't in any way specific to clocks, right now the likely solution > > looks to be Grant's changes for retrying probe() as new devices come on > > line. With that devices can return a

Re: debuild & no secret keys

2011-10-03 Thread Tom Gall
Thanks for the help everyone. It was the .devscripts file that I hadn't copied over which as it turned out was specifying which key was to be used through DEBSIGN_KEYID. It's always the simple things! On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:40 PM, James Westby wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:20:12 -0500, Tom G

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Rob Herring
On 10/03/2011 09:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:17:30AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > > A lot of stuff that should really have been cut plus... > >>> + if (clk->ops->get_parent) >>> + /* We don't to lock against pre

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:17:30AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: A lot of stuff that should really have been cut plus... > > + if (clk->ops->get_parent) > > + /* We don't to lock against prepare/enable here, as > > +* the clock i

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

2011-10-03 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > From: Jeremy Kerr > > We currently have ~21 definitions of struct clk in the ARM architecture, > each defined on a per-platform basis. This makes it difficult to define > platform- (or architecture-) independent clock sources without making > assump

[pm-qa] do sanity check before jumping in the next tests

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Check all the cpus are online before the tests Check all the cpus are back online after the tests. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- cpuhotplug/1_sanity_check.sh | 39 +++ cpuhotplug/1_sanity_check.txt |1 + cpuhotplug/z_sanity_check.sh | 39

Re: [pm-qa] change header to specify 'on Linux'

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/2011 11:32 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > Ack > Applied. - -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter

Re: [pm-qa 02/10] add the makefile for cpuhotplug

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/2011 10:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- [ ... ] > Otherwise, ack for the patchset. All patchset applied. Thanks -- Daniel - --

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S3C2410: Remove section mismatch warning

2011-10-03 Thread Tushar Behera
Hi Russell, On Monday 03 October 2011 03:29 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:10:41PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: Some of the functions and structures did not have _init or __initdata attributes, even though they were referenced from functions / structures with thos

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S3C2410: Remove section mismatch warning

2011-10-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:10:41PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > Some of the functions and structures did not have _init or __initdata > attributes, even though they were referenced from functions / structures > with those attribute, resulting in section mismatches. Firstly - it's a good idea to i

[PATCH] ARM: S3C2410: Remove section mismatch warning

2011-10-03 Thread Tushar Behera
Some of the functions and structures did not have _init or __initdata attributes, even though they were referenced from functions / structures with those attribute, resulting in section mismatches. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- The patch is rebased on v3.1-rc8. The patch has only been build

Re: [pm-qa] change header to specify 'on Linux'

2011-10-03 Thread Amit Kucheria
Ack On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Specify the test suite can be run on Linux because it is not > ARM specific. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- >  Makefile                                      |    2 +- >  Test.mk                                       |    2 +-

[pm-qa] change header to specify 'on Linux'

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Specify the test suite can be run on Linux because it is not ARM specific. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- Makefile |2 +- Test.mk |2 +- cpufreq/Makefile |2 +- cpufreq/cpufreq_

Re: [pm-qa 02/10] add the makefile for cpuhotplug

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/2011 10:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- >> cpuhotplug/Makefile | 25 + >> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(

Re: [pm-qa 02/10] add the makefile for cpuhotplug

2011-10-03 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- >  cpuhotplug/Makefile |   25 + >  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >  create mode 100644 cpuhotplug/Makefile > > diff --git a/cpuhotplug/Makefile b/cpuhotplug/Makef

[pm-qa 04/10] check the cpu state is reflected in sysfs

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_02 + +source ../include/functions.sh + +check_state() { +local cpu=$1 +local dirpath=$CPU_PATH/$1 +lo

[pm-qa 10/10] do some stress test

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Randomly offline/online a cpu Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_08 + +source ../include/functions.sh + +function randomize() { +echo $[ ( $RAN

[pm-qa 07/10] check /proc/cpuinfo when unplugging a cpu

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_05 + +source ../include/functions.sh + +check_procinfo() { +local cpu=$1 +local cpuid=${cpu:3} +local

[pm-qa 02/10] add the makefile for cpuhotplug

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +include ../Test.mk -- 1.7.1 ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

[pm-qa 06/10] check the task is migrated when offlining a cpu

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_04 + +CPUBURN=../utils/cpuburn +source ../include/functions.sh + +check_task_migrate() { +local cpu=$1 +l

[pm-qa 09/10] test the userspace notification

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_07 + +source ../include/functions.sh +TMPFILE=cpuhotplug_07.tmp + +check_notification() { +local cpu=$1 +

[pm-qa 03/10] check the files are present

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_01 + +source ../include/functions.sh + +FILES="online offline possible present" + +for i in $FILES; do +check

[pm-qa 05/10] test the affinity does not work on an offline cpu

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_03 + +source ../include/functions.sh + +check_affinity_fails() { +local cpu=$1 +local cpuid=${cpu:3} +

[pm-qa 08/10] check /proc/interrupts when offlining a cpu

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano (IBM Corporation) +# - initial API and implementation +# + +# URL : https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpuhotplug_06 + +source ../include/functions.sh + +check_procinfo() { +local cpu=$1 +local cpuid=${cpu:3} +local

[pm-qa 01/10] factor out check_file function

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: BUGREPORTED work item state

2011-10-03 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 03.10.2011 04:48, Zach Pfeffer pisze: > On 30 September 2011 13:22, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> Hi Zach, >> >> I noticed that you introduced BUGREPORTED on Android blueprints for >> the work items. >> It raised a couple of questions: >> 1. what does BUGREPORTED means ? > > When David Zinmann an