This driver add support for DA9052 4-wire resistive ADC interfaced touchscreen
controller.
DA9052 is a MFD therefore this driver depends on DA9052 core driver for core
functionalities.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
---
Changes since v4:
- Add string "compile this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2011 05:41 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>
>> Test 6: do some stress test
>> ===
>>
>> for each cpu
>> * for i in 1 .. 50
>> * set cpuX offline
>> * set cpuX bac
On 28 September 2011 15:17, Jesse Barker wrote:
> I wonder if we can't provide a more direct link to the whole topic of
> "Getting Involved". While some people want to enable their hardware
> or their own development, but I couldn't find a trail of fewer than 3
> links to something like "Send mai
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Test 6: do some stress test
> ===
>
> for each cpu
> * for i in 1 .. 50
> * set cpuX offline
> * set cpuX back online
>
Not sure how evil you want to get with this, but several years back I wrote
a simple, but na
Hi
On 22 September 2011 20:01, James Westby wrote:
> IS would like to upgrade the porter boxes from maverick to natty, which
> should make them more stable.
>
> This will require a reboot, and the upgrade may cause issues for some
> tasks, so please be aware and plan accordingly.
>
> The plan is
+1 on what Fathi said.
I wonder if we can't provide a more direct link to the whole topic of
"Getting Involved". While some people want to enable their hardware
or their own development, but I couldn't find a trail of fewer than 3
links to something like "Send mail to linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Hi,
On 28 September 2011 22:59, Andy Doan wrote:
> Michael and I were tasked with making the front page of the Linaro wiki
> a little more developer focused and offloading some of the other
> information to the main website, linaro.org.
>
> We've put together a prototype page and would like to ge
I will have a look on my side to align with DevPlatform team on latest updates
Regards
Fred
Frederic Turgis
OMAP Platform Business Unit - OMAP System Engineering - Platform Enablement
>
Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve Loubet.
036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Cap
Michael and I were tasked with making the front page of the Linaro wiki
a little more developer focused and offloading some of the other
information to the main website, linaro.org.
We've put together a prototype page and would like to get some feedback
before making the real switch:
https://wi
For now Linaro is focused on Ubuntu and Android.
Why not get some people from Gentoo, Arch, and Fedora/redhat to get
something generic ?
And some LAVA for all ?
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/list
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Deepti Kalakeri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Deepti Kalakeri <
>> deepti.kalak...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Paul,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>>
>>
Hi Ash,
On 28 September 2011 20:40, Ash Charles wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> If you are interested in running Nano, ALIP or Developer image _or_ want to
>> try
>> our LEB on one of the board support packs maintained by our community, please
>> help and test b
Hi Fathi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> If you are interested in running Nano, ALIP or Developer image _or_ want to
> try
> our LEB on one of the board support packs maintained by our community, please
> help and test by following the download and installation instructio
Linus Walleij wrote at Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:59 AM:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
> > But can't debugfs just get its information from the device name field in
> > the mapping table? I'm not sure why the need to use that information for
> > debugfs prevents t
Hello,
> Part of the problem seems to be that we may not do a good job of
> passing on the knowledge and understanding necessary to allow
> users to help themselves.
I don't know if you want user feedback on this thread but here goes...
I started playing with Linaro about a year ago coming from an
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Deepti Kalakeri <
> deepti.kalak...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>
>>> Just out of curiosity, have you tried building an image locally using
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Deepti Kalakeri wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiosity, have you tried building an image locally using this
>> hwpack and booting it?
>>
>>
> I have not tried this specifically, but I have tried othe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Changelog:
==
V2:
* fixed typo online -> offline spotted by Amit
* added task migration check as suggested by Amit and David
* added check of irq migration as suggested by David
* added check /proc/cpuinfo, processor is back when online
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:30:07AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In preparation for the release of Linaro 11.09 images on 2011-09-29, we have
> collected candidate submissions for our Linaro Evaluation Build (LEB),
> Developers and Community images.
>
> All primary developement boards supp
In case you missed the news...
MeeGo to be folded into Linux-based Tizen OS, slated to arrive in 2012
http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/28/meego-to-be-folded-into-linux-based-tizen-os-slated-to-arrive-i/
and someone's created an interesting picture-based commentary on that
announcement
http://img
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 02:31 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 13:19, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/28/2011 12:33 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
>>> On 28 September 2011 11:18, Daniel Lezcano
>>
On 28 September 2011 13:19, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/28/2011 12:33 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
>> On 28 September 2011 11:18, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Interaction with irqbalancing?
>
> Can you elaborate ? Do you mean we check irq affinity fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 12:33 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 11:18, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here are some tests to test the cpu hotplug.
>>
>> Any feedback would be appreciate
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>>
>> -- Daniel
>>
>
>> Test 3:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 01:04 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
[ ... ]
>> Test 3: check the affinity does not work on an online cpu
>
> offline
right. Thanks.
[ ... ]
>> Test 6: do some stress test
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> But can't debugfs just get its information from the device name field in
> the mapping table? I'm not sure why the need to use that information for
> debugfs prevents the having entries with both the hog flag set and a
> device name set?
T
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:16 PM, David Long wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:29 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
>
> Please just do something :) I don't see why you can't supply the
> kernels with oprofile working in timer mode with a usable sampling
> frequency *right now*. That should be enough
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> here are some tests to test the cpu hotplug.
>
> Any feedback would be appreciate
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> -- Daniel
>
>
> Test 1: check the sysfs files are present
> ===
On 28 September 2011 11:18, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here are some tests to test the cpu hotplug.
>
> Any feedback would be appreciate
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> -- Daniel
>
> Test 3: check the affinity does not work on an online cpu
> ===
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
here are some tests to test the cpu hotplug.
Any feedback would be appreciate
Thanks a lot
-- Daniel
Test 1: check the sysfs files are present
=
for each cpu
* check /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Stijn Devriendt wrote:
>> + spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
>
> Now this is racing with...
> (...)
> ... this:
>
>> + spin_lock(&desc->lock);
>> + desc->mux_requested = true;
>> + strncpy(desc->mux_function, function, sizeof(desc->mux_function));
30 matches
Mail list logo
