Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-18 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 17:53 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > I'm not sure a common interface to all of these different > > channels makes sense, but surely a DSI library and an aux channel > > library would fit nicely alongside the existing DDC library. > > DSI and the various other MIPI bits tend to be

Try Linaro’s 11.09 Toolchain and our 2nd Android Release Candidate Based on It

2011-09-18 Thread Zach Pfeffer
11.09 Release Canidate 2 is out! This is the second 11.09 Android release canidate. Each build has been built with the official Linaro 4.6 toolchain release: https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/toolchain-4.6-2011.09/ (we track the tip toolchain which allowed us to release an

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mmc: rectify boot param option for fault injection

2011-09-18 Thread Akinobu Mita
2011/9/14 Per Forlin : > Akinobu Mita reported that the boot option for mmc fault injection is never > compiled in due to a fauly "ifdef KERNEL" that is never set. > A correct ifdef would be "ifndef MODULE". This patch set adds a > module_param_cb() and thereby no ifndef MODULE is needed. > Using a

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >> This would leave us with the issue of controlling formats and other >> parameters >> on the pipelines. We could keep separate DRM, KMS, FB and V4L APIs for that, > > There are some other differences that matter. The exact state and > behaviour o

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-18 Thread Alan Cox
> This would leave us with the issue of controlling formats and other > parameters > on the pipelines. We could keep separate DRM, KMS, FB and V4L APIs for that, There are some other differences that matter. The exact state and behaviour of memory, sequencing of accesses, cache control and mana

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, (CC'ing linux-media, as I believe this is very on-topic) On Sunday 18 September 2011 18:14:26 Rob Clark wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 15 September 2011 20:39:21 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote: > >> On 09/15/2011 05:52 PM, Alex Deucher w

ioctl ABI considerations for 64b ARM?

2011-09-18 Thread Rob Clark
I don't suppose there are any guidelines from ARM about compatibility between 32bit userspace and 64bit kernel on some hypothetical future version of the ARM architecture? Some hints about what to do or not do could perhaps save some ioctl compat glue later on down the line.. BR, -R -- F

Re: HDMI on Overo with Linaro ALIP

2011-09-18 Thread Ash Charles
Hi AJ, On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:14 AM, AJ ONeal wrote: > HWPACK > http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/hwpacks/latest/hwpack_linaro-overo_20110823-0_armel_supported.tar.gz > ALIP > http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/alip/latest/alip-n-tar-20110823-1.tar.gz Yes---these releases

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi everybody, > > On Thursday 15 September 2011 20:39:21 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote: >> On 09/15/2011 05:52 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> > >> > Please don't claim that the DRM developers do not want to cooperate. >> > I realize that peo