Enclosed, please find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the Linaro
Release Weekly meeting held on September 1st in #linaro-meeting on
irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC.
== Meeting Minutes ==
http://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/WeeklyReleaseMeeting/2011-09-01
== Meeting Log ==
http://irclogs
On 6 September 2011 00:15, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Paul Sokolovsky
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:48 +0300
>> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>>
>> Ok, patched repo is available as:
>>
>> http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=tools/repo.git;a=blob_plain;f=repo;h
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:48 +0300
> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>
> Ok, patched repo is available as:
>
> http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=tools/repo.git;a=blob_plain;f=repo;hb=refs/heads/linaro-stable
> that file should be downloaded an
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:48 +0300
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Ok, patched repo is available as:
http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=tools/repo.git;a=blob_plain;f=repo;hb=refs/heads/linaro-stable
that file should be downloaded and named as "repo". Apparently, it
should be mirrored at download server
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:18:34 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're running Jenkins EC2 plugin v 1.11 on android-build.linaro.org,
> which is 2 releases behind the latest 1.13. Per ChangeLog, it fixes
> slave label expression evaluation, which affected me once when I tried
> to do more
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> By "OMAP DRM *without* the GEM" I assume you mean the current existing
> DRM-supporting version, and not the patch that Rob is currently
> discussing on dri-devel?
>
yes. in fact we plan to support 2 stacks:
1- OMAP DRM without GEM
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:19:18PM +0200, Nicolas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Ilias Biris wrote:
>
> > Also note the development on MM: Jesse is preparing a GIT tree to
> > contain the patches available, including components from the
> > Video-Multimedia side (eg OMAP DRM driver (ma
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:10:58PM +0800, Jim Huang wrote:
> 2011/9/3 Tom Gall :
> > Is a method via the aux vectors to know at runtime if neon is or is
> > not present?
>
> hi Tom,
>
> Did you mean this?
> https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12448
The recipe in step #1 is probably a good
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hello, Rob.
> I didn't look into any comments from other develops yet , so my comments
> could be duplicated with other ones. below is my opinions and I commented
> your codes also.
>
> We can discuss crtc, encoder and connector. in x86 world, my u
Hello,
We're running Jenkins EC2 plugin v 1.11 on android-build.linaro.org,
which is 2 releases behind the latest 1.13. Per ChangeLog, it fixes
slave label expression evaluation, which affected me once when I tried
to do more flexible slave selection for builds (we fortunately were
able to get pas
Hello Fathi,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:19:11 -0500
Zach Pfeffer wrote:
[]
> > But we already seem to have decided to use patched repo, no??
>
> Seems to be the consensus.
>
> Would you write up where to pull Linaro's repo from and why its
> different? Make sure the release engineers are in the lo
On Thursday 01 September 2011, John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:45 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 21:05 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > > It seems the linaro-dev list isn't configed to avoid mailing folks who
> > > are already recipients of the email.
> >
>
Tushar Behera wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 31 August 2011 06:31 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Tushar Behera wrote:
> >>
> >> Platform data for SDHCI controller on ORIGEN board is missing the
> >> support for 8-bit bus width. The platform data is extended in sync
> >> with other EXYNOS4 machines.
> >>
> >>
On 5 September 2011 10:52, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 05.09.2011 11:28, Andrew Stubbs pisze:
>> Next question ... is /proc/cpuinfo really the best way to detect this?
>>
>> I mean, is auxv a better approach? Or something else? What's the most
>> efficient, and most stable API to read the C
W dniu 05.09.2011 11:28, Andrew Stubbs pisze:
> Next question ... is /proc/cpuinfo really the best way to detect this?
>
> I mean, is auxv a better approach? Or something else? What's the most
> efficient, and most stable API to read the CPU architecture, CPU model,
> and FPU/NEON availability?
>
On 01/09/11 10:40, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
I'm currently trying to get GCC to auto-detect what CPU to optimize for
by finding out what CPU it's actually running on (the user would only
have to pass -mcpu=native). It does this simply by reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Thanks to everybody who answered my pre
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:29:43AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> > Above set of get/put functions seem to do very little. Drop them for the
> > first round?
>
> The intention is to do attach/detach_pages here.. and in case of
> get/put_paddr do remapping into TILER if the buffer isn't physically
> con
17 matches
Mail list logo
