Re: Bero, will you be available for tomorrow's hacking session?

On 26 August 2011 13:02, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > ... >> Since the kernel is running the framebuffer I would start to look there. >> >> Yves, >> >> Do you have a PoC for the framebuffer driver owner at Freescale? > > jason.c...@freescale.com T

Re: Bero, will you be available for tomorrow's hacking session?

On 26 August 2011 20:06, Eric Miao wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >> On 26 August 2011 09:35, Eric Miao wrote: >>> Hi Zach, >>> >>> We are really a bit short of resource at this moment. We'll definitely look >>> into this issue once we finish our current focused wo

Re: Bero, will you be available for tomorrow's hacking session?

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 26 August 2011 09:35, Eric Miao wrote: >> Hi Zach, >> >> We are really a bit short of resource at this moment. We'll definitely look >> into this issue once we finish our current focused work (likely the week >> after next). However, befor

Having some trouble boot Panda with MLO compiled from source

John, I'm having some trouble booting Panda with our MLO that gets compiled from source. We've got a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/833832 Which details the current state of things. -Zach ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@li

11.09 and beyond Android Planning

Team (and others), Now that we have images for all boards (2 images for Panda) it should allow us to really start cranking. I recently reviewed the capabilities of each board and would like to focus on enabling the connectivity options for each. In order of importance we should make sure these wor

Re: Please just send things to linaro-dev...

Cool. Thanks for the input everyone. On 26 August 2011 07:17, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:59:55PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: >> > I don't think we should shut down the #linaro-android because it's an open >> > channel rather than the private mailing list "linaro-

Re: Update on Gerrit deployment

On 26 August 2011 00:04, Andy Green wrote: > On 08/26/2011 12:12 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > >>> 1. Set up branch policy (naming, etc.) and enforce it on Gerrit level. >>> This may require revamping branching in other toolchain/* components >>> (upstreamed not from AOSP), but

Re: Bero, will you be available for tomorrow's hacking session?

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: ... > Since the kernel is running the framebuffer I would start to look there. > > Yves, > > Do you have a PoC for the framebuffer driver owner at Freescale? jason.c...@freescale.com Regards, Fabio Estevam ___

Re: Bero, will you be available for tomorrow's hacking session?

On 26 August 2011 09:35, Eric Miao wrote: > Hi Zach, > > We are really a bit short of resource at this moment. We'll definitely look > into this issue once we finish our current focused work (likely the week > after next). However, before that, could your team help with: Can you pull it in a litt

RE: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, August 26, 2011 2:35 AM: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 4:13 AM: > > > >> So this is radically different in that it requires the pin control > >> system to assume basically that any one pi

Re: 11.07 oprofile on panda busted?

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Tom Gall wrote: > > I'll give that a try. Still, oprofile ought to work out of the box > without fiddling agreed. if that works, you will need to add that in default bootargs, or update the defconfig. ___ linaro-dev ma

RE: [PATCH 0/4 v4] pin controller subsystem v4

Barry Song wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:59 PM: > 2011/8/22 Linus Walleij : > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> it seems there is not an actual example that gpio requests pin from > >> pinctrl yet. i might give one on SiRFprimaII. > > > > No go

RE: Erro "make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.38-1003-linaro-omap/build: No such file or directory."

Background information: I am testing on a Cortex-A9 panda board. Thanks, Juan -Original Message- From: Juan Gao Sent: 26 August 2011 14:23 To: 'linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org' Subject: Erro "make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.38-1003-linaro-omap/build: No such file or directory." Dear Linaro team,

Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

+ Balaji, On Friday 26 August 2011 09:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is broken on OMAPs HSMMC: mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00 mmcblk0: retrying usin

Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is broken on OMAPs HSMMC: mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00 mmcblk0: retrying using single block re

Re: 11.07 oprofile on panda busted?

Thanks. I'll give that a try. Still, oprofile ought to work out of the box without fiddling. Regards, Tom On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Tom Gall wrote: >> >> Say has anyone else run oprofile on recent builds on panda? >> >> By

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] ARM: kernel: Small fixes in save/restore common code.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:33:45PM +0100, Amit Kucheria wrote: > This patch is redundant with Lorenzo's new series[1]. Adding him to cc. I > suggest you rebase on top of his latest series. > Yes, thanks for pointing that out. > On 11 Aug 19, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > > These changes are neces

Re: [NOTES] Kernel WG Weekly Status report for week ending 2011-08-26

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:07:44AM -0500, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: >>  * Integrated patch set for Qualcomm Hexagon architecture > > Interesting. What exactly is this? > >>  * The v6/v7 single kernel patches are now accepted by Russell;

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:12:10AM -0700, David Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:12:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > mach-msm: > > > > > > Hard to tell how this works and what's available, support > > seems to be incomplete. Currently it seems to be wired > > to do

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:12:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > mach-msm: > > > Hard to tell how this works and what's available, support > seems to be incomplete. Currently it seems to be wired > to do either a dedicated function (like some UART pin) > or GPIO, like each pin ca

11.08 Pre-built Images

The 11.08 release includes some commonly used pre-built images. This mean you can now download a single file and "dd" it to your SD card without having to use linaro-media-create. The images just use the l-m-c defaults. ie, there's no pre-built image that uses BTRFS. The downloads are: - Nano:

Re: cpuset configuration and measurements for power management

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/26/2011 04:17 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I created a wiki page describing what we are trying to achieve with > the cpuset for power management. > > https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Cpuset FYI, some p

Re: [NOTES] Power Management WG Weekly Status report week ending 2011-08-26

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:30:54AM -0500, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: > * Delivered powerqa first release, new powerdebug release (fixes > only) and new powertop release working on Android powerqa! Was an announcement of the new project posted to linaro-dev, and if not, can we get one done? > * Upd

Re: [NOTES] Kernel WG Weekly Status report for week ending 2011-08-26

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:07:44AM -0500, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: > * Integrated patch set for Qualcomm Hexagon architecture Interesting. What exactly is this? > * The v6/v7 single kernel patches are now accepted by Russell; these should > allow linaro filesystems to work on omap2plus_defconfig k

Re: cpuset configuration and measurements for power management

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I created a wiki page describing what we are trying to achieve with the cpuset for power management. https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Cpuset Thanks -- Daniel - -- Linaro.org │ Open sou

[NOTES] Kernel WG Weekly Status report for week ending 2011-08-26

Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report for the kernel working group for the week ending 2011-08-26. == Meeting Minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-08-22 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2011-08-25

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On 26 August 2011 16:26, Dave Martin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > > [...] > >> the impact of bugs in releases.  For example, bug 824545 means that >> the user will get an unbootable image on some boards by following our >> instructions -- that feels like the kind

[NOTES] Power Management WG Weekly Status report week ending 2011-08-26

Enclosed please find the link to the Meeting Minutes & Weekly Status report for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2011-08-26. == Meeting Minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-08-24 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/W

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Dave Martin wrote: [...] > the impact of bugs in releases.  For example, bug 824545 means that > the user will get an unbootable image on some boards by following our > instructions -- that feels like the kind of thing that definitely needs to be > visible in the

Erro "make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.38-1003-linaro-omap/build: No such file or directory."

Dear Linaro team, I have a problem when I try to make a module. To make the module file xx.c, I have the following command line in my Makefile: make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(pwd) modules an error occured: make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.38-1003-linaro-omap/build: No such file

Re: ANN: ASTER - Android System Testing Environment and Runtime

We've talked about it with Jim already, but it's unclear at the moment whether it would be suitable as a full replacement for the android test runner, or something that our test runner would run as a test, and would help us get tests into the android test runner quickly (since hopefully it will sup

Re: playing with the lava scheduler

hi I tried to run the lavaserver in a virtualenv. But when try -> lava-server syncdb I am getting the following error. What might be the problem. (last lines of the error mgs) -> self.connection = Database.connect(**kwargs) sqlite3.OperationalError: unable to open database file 1) What

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Fathi Boudra > wrote:> > > It assumes you know l-m-b and know where/how to get it. At this point, > > you reached the step 3: step by step instructions to flash the board, > > including how to get the tools.

Re: Please just send things to linaro-dev...

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:59:55PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > I don't think we should shut down the #linaro-android because it's an open > > channel rather than the private mailing list "linaro-andr...@linaro.org". > > People can join this channel freely, and the discussion in this channel ca

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On 26 August 2011 14:38, Amit Kucheria wrote: >> > a) Is the omission of the "Developers and Community Builds" links from >> > http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ intentional? >> >> Yes, it is. We made the choice to promote only the officially supported >> builds >> on the downloads page. Developers

Re: ANN: ASTER - Android System Testing Environment and Runtime

Hi Jim, sounds interesting. Would be cool to have this integrated/available in linaro android. I guess this would help us design and execute testcases for android to be run in LAVA? wonder how much overlap this has with the testrunner framework discussed/developed in pauls team for android+lava.

Re: Please just send things to linaro-dev...

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Botao Sun wrote: > Hi Zach, > > Although I think "linaro-andr...@linaro.org" is easy to use, especially > inside the team, but if consider about the development information sharing > and to avoid duplicate discussion, send message to linaro-dev may be the > most

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > The wiki release page itself is not easily findable without going to the > wiki. > > > Really? It's clearly mentionned on the release announcement, posted on > planet. > Obviously, if somebody miss the announce and goes directly to the webs

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > Hi, > > On 26 August 2011 12:18, Dave Martin wrote: > > Hi there > > > > A few questions-- > > > > a) Is the omission of the "Developers and Community Builds" links from > > http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ intentional? > > Yes, it is. We ma

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

On 11 Aug 26, Fathi Boudra wrote: > Hi, > > On 26 August 2011 12:18, Dave Martin wrote: > > Hi there > > > > A few questions-- > > > > a) Is the omission of the "Developers and Community Builds" links from > > http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ intentional? > > Yes, it is. We made the choice to pr

Re: Please just send things to linaro-dev...

Hi Zach, Although I think "linaro-andr...@linaro.org" is easy to use, especially inside the team, but if consider about the development information sharing and to avoid duplicate discussion, send message to linaro-dev may be the most efficient way. I don't think we should shut down the #linaro-an

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

Hi, On 26 August 2011 12:18, Dave Martin wrote: > Hi there > > A few questions-- > > a) Is the omission of the "Developers and Community Builds" links from > http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ intentional? Yes, it is. We made the choice to promote only the officially supported builds on the downlo

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] fastboot gadget support

On 08/24/2011 09:34 PM, Remy Bohmer wrote: Hi, Hi, thanks for your time. 2011/8/10 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: It was tested before it has been re-written. It is possible that it is broken. It is posted for reference only not for merging. Looking at this code, I can already say that the wa

Re: 11.07 oprofile on panda busted?

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Tom Gall wrote: > Say has anyone else run oprofile on recent builds on panda? > > By recent I mean say anything since 11.07? Reason for asking is I'm > seeing basically a very very small number of samples being recorded... > as in there's no way this is right. >

[PATCH 0/3] Extend SDHCI support for Origen board

Patch 1: It fixes the incorrect card detection type. Patch 2: It enables secondary MMC port. Patch 3: It extends support of 8-bit bus width The patches are rebased to for-next branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git Tushar Behera (3): ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix sd

[PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix sdhci card detection for ORIGEN

Fix incorrect value of cd_type field in platform data for sdhci device. Based on "ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix card detection for sdhci 0 and 2". commit a0d8efedb203b5b908dd46cea38201761e2380f9 Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c |4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support for 8-bit bus width in SDHCI for ORIGEN

Platform data for SDHCI controller on ORIGEN board is missing the support for 8-bit bus width. The platform data is extended in sync with other EXYNOS4 machines. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

[PATCH 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support for secondary MMC port on ORIGEN

Secondary MMC port on ORIGEN is connected to sdhci instance 0. Support for secondary MMC port is extended by registering sdhci instance 0. Since sdhci instance 2 can contain a bootable media, sdhci instance 0 is registered after instance 2. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4

Re: Linaro 11.08 released

Hi there A few questions-- a) Is the omission of the "Developers and Community Builds" links from http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ intentional? This is a concern, because these links contain the _only_ deliverables for certain platform and filesystem combinations. The wiki release page itself i

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tested-by: Barry Song Thanks! > Linus, i'll also send the patch of csr pinmux prototype. you might > review and take it as another example except your stericsson U300 and > take care while you merge pinmux. OK I'm modifyi

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 4:13 AM: > >> So this is radically different in that it requires the pin control >> system to assume basically that any one pin can be used for >> any one function. > > I think that's the wron

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] pin controller subsystem v4

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you want the pinmux_request_gpio called by the gpiolib driver or by > every device driver who uses this gpio? I always thought about the gpiolib driver. I think Grant told me he wanted drivers with combined GPIO and pinm