[PATCH 1/1] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add PWM backlight support on Origen

From: Giridhar Maruthy This patch adds support for LCD backlight using PWM timer on Origen board. Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |2 ++ arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c | 16 2 files changed, 18 ins

Re: Generic Linux cross toolchain for tests

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Hi > > Some time ago we agreed that not everyone here uses Ubuntu distribution > and decided to provide so called 'generic linux' cross toolchain. > Recently I managed to get it done and now need brave testers to tell is > it working or

Re: Android gcc 4.6 1107 optimization benchmark

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Chao Yang wrote: > HI Michael, > The build log can be found at > http://people.linaro.org/~chaoyang/shared_sources/build_2011-08-19_20-33.log > The benchmark wiki > page https://wiki.linaro.org/ChaoYang/Sandbox/gccoptimization is updated on > 1. Adding benchmark f

Re: Multistrap and required packages

A little update and clarification. omitrequired is the option to not consider the Priority: required packages. However once added additional packages are getting pulled into the build. From the snippet below, we can see recommended and suggested aren't getting picked up which is good, but there's

Multistrap and required packages

Hi Wookey (and others that might be interested) With Mutlistrap and qemu we've gotten live-build to be able to cross build most of our images. The next step however in nano is to pull out a number of the packages and in some cases replace them with busybox components to get an even smaller rootfs.

Re: [ACTIVITY] OCTO status report - wk 33.2011 (20110815-20110819)

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > AIUI this is blocked on IS deployment of a new architecture tag. Has > this been resolved? not yet; this is tracked in RT #46652 and was blocked on hardware availability and deployment for a while -- Loïc Minier __

Re: [ACTIVITY] OCTO status report - wk 33.2011 (20110815-20110819)

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:54:00PM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote: > - work is continuing for ARMHF and by the end of the week we will have a > clear picture of what was done from the original targets for August. AIUI this is blocked on IS deployment of a new architecture tag. Has this been resolved? >

Re: QA tests for Android

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:03:45PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > I filled out the form based on Zach's input. One can go and see an > example > > here: > > > > + > > > https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/viewform?h

Re: issues benchmarking 11.08 toolchain

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > That looks suspiciously close to the code that we patched out in platform a > while back to get 4.5/4.6 going in external/elfcopy/: > > > http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=platform/external/elfcopy.git;a=commitdiff;h=c13687fefcc8034de

[ACTIVITY] OCTO status report - wk 33.2011 (20110815-20110819)

Last meeting minutes : https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/2011-08-16 Status report link: https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/WeeklyReport Summary of the highlights: - work is continuing for ARMHF and by the end of the week we will have a clear picture of what was done from the original targets f

Re: Input for an "optimized" slide

2011/8/22 Bernhard Rosenkranzer : > On 21 August 2011 15:00, Michael Hope wrote: >> Sorry, silly question, but does Android use the glibc dynamic linker? > > No, they really like reinventing the wheel. Bionic comes with its own > dynamic linker. hi Bernhard and Michael, The dynamic linker is fil

Re: Hi everyone, I'm glad to announce the Linaro Android image 11.08 RC for Samsung Origen board.

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:24:41 +0800 Botao Sun wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As our release plan, you can get the 11.08 release candidate of Linaro > Android image for Samsung Origen board: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-origen-11.08-release/#build=2 Great work, Bota

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix to work with origen boards.

On 19 August 2011 19:29, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap > wrote: >> This adds a function to get the revision id. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaecheol Lee >> Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn >> --- >>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c              |   10 ++

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support AFTR mode cpuidle state on EXYNOS4210

On 21 August 2011 22:48, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 06:39:59PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> +ENTRY(exynos4_enter_lp) >> +     stmfd   sp!, { r3 - r12, lr } >> + >> +     adr     r0, sleep_save_misc >> + >> +     mrc     p15, 0, r2, c15, c0, 0  @ read power co

Fwd: Linaro Android image 11.08 RC for Snowball LEB

Sharing with linaro-devs. Mathieu. Original Message Subject: Linaro Android image 11.08 RC for Snowball LEB Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:02:26 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: linaro-andr...@linaro.org As our release plan, you can get the 11/08 Linaro Android release image for t

Re: [PATCH 0/6] CPUoffline framework

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:52:33PM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote: > "Nacked-by: Peter Zijlstra > > the kernel really shouldn't be using hotplug for this (nor should > userspace really). hot-unplugging random cpus wrecks things like > cpusets. Furthermore hotplug does way too much work to use as a si

Hi everyone, I'm glad to announce the Linaro Android image 11.08 RC for Panda upstream build.

Hi everyone, As our release plan, you can get the 11.08 release candidate of Linaro Android image for Panda upstream build: https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-11.08-release/#build=4 After you download these 3 files (if you download them with wget in console, you may n

Re: [PATCH 0/6] CPUoffline framework

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:18:52AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:38:13PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: >> > This series is posted for posterity.  It has been NAK'd by the community >> > since CPU

Hi everyone, I'm glad to announce the Linaro Android image 11.08 RC for Panda LEB.

Hi everyone, As our release plan, you can get the 11.08 release candidate of Linaro Android image for Panda LEB: https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda-11.08-release/#build= 4 Af

Hi everyone, I'm glad to announce the Linaro Android image 11.08 RC for Samsung Origen board.

Hi everyone, As our release plan, you can get the 11.08 release candidate of Linaro Android image for Samsung Origen board: https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-origen-11.08-release/#build=2 After you download these 3 files (if you download them with wget in console, you m

Re: [PATCH 0/6] CPUoffline framework

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:18:52AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:38:13PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > > This series is posted for posterity. It has been NAK'd by the community > > since CPU hotplug has been deemed an inappropriate mechanism for power > > capp

Re: [PATCH 0/6] CPUoffline framework

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:38:13PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > This series is posted for posterity. It has been NAK'd by the community > since CPU hotplug has been deemed an inappropriate mechanism for power > capping. I spoke with Amit about this last week. What's the plan going forward on re

Re: QA tests for Android

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:03:45PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > I filled out the form based on Zach's input. One can go and see an example > here: > > + > https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/viewform?hl=en_US&formkey=dGhYQ3lwdzZvRHRSWDBoT1ZETVNtMlE6MA#gid=0 > > Next: to help test

Re: Input for an "optimized" slide

On 21 August 2011 15:00, Michael Hope wrote: > Sorry, silly question, but does Android use the glibc dynamic linker? No, they really like reinventing the wheel. Bionic comes with its own dynamic linker. > If not, does its linker support other hash styles? It looks like it supports both the sysv

Re: trouble building linux-linaro-3.0-2011.08-0

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:54:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.o > > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S: Assembler messages: > > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does

Re: libjpeg-turbo 1.1.90 for linaro 11.08

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 04:31:24PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > In support of the Linaro 11.08 release, the libjpeg-turbo package has > been updated substantially from 1.1.1 to 1.1.90 which closely tracks > the upcoming 1.2 community release. On ARM make test passes and image > quality appears to be g

Re: Patch for fixing soft-reboot problem in ORIGEN

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Tushar Behera wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Can you please cherry-pick following patch onto linaro kernel? > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git;a=patch;h=d2edddf2b25863ec0893635662b0832f9965b543 Done.

Re: [PATCH 2/4 v4] pinmux: add a driver for the U300 pinmux

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +       if (upmx) { > > why do you need to check whether upmx is not NULL. if it is NULL, we > have failed in probe(). > and it is also impossible to call this remove() twice. True, removing the if()-clause. >> +static str

Re: About busybox integration.

Hi Kiko, Yes, as Bero said, the busybox compiling will be failed with the old tool chain if we don't add those "-I" options manually. But thank you to alert me that I have to correct a thing which is if you want to compile your platform source code with our latest RC tool chain: https://android-b

Re: trouble building linux-linaro-3.0-2011.08-0

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:54:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.o > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S: Assembler messages: > > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S:127: Error: selected processor does > > not support requested special purpose register -- `mrs r2

Re: About busybox integration.

On 22 August 2011 05:56, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:45:47AM -0700, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >> On 19 August 2011 09:36, Botao Sun wrote: >> > Currently, we have 2 different situations according to our 2 different tool >> > chains - old and new. > > What do old and new

Re: Generic Linux cross toolchain for tests

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Some time ago we agreed that not everyone here uses Ubuntu distribution > and decided to provide so called 'generic linux' cross toolchain. > Recently I managed to get it done and now need brave testers to tell is > it working or not. > > Get it he

Generic Linux cross toolchain for tests

Hi Some time ago we agreed that not everyone here uses Ubuntu distribution and decided to provide so called 'generic linux' cross toolchain. Recently I managed to get it done and now need brave testers to tell is it working or not. Get it here: http://people.linaro.org/~hrw/generic-linux/ (64bit

Re: [PATCH v3] usb: musb: ux500: optimize DMA callback routine

Hi, On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:03:40AM +0200, Per Forlin wrote: > From: Per Forlin > > Skip the use of work queue and call musb_dma_completion() directly from > DMA callback context. > > Here follows measurements on a Snowball board with ondemand governor active. > > Performance using work que

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:38:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jamie Iles wrote: > > > for device tree, when the gpio > > controllers are registered, the base is typically dynamically assigned.  I > > suspect that this can be solved in the device tree binding fo

Re: About busybox integration.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:45:47AM -0700, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 19 August 2011 09:36, Botao Sun wrote: > > Currently, we have 2 different situations according to our 2 different tool > > chains - old and new. What do old and new mean here? -- Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP Brazil (GM

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jamie Iles wrote: > for device tree, when the gpio > controllers are registered, the base is typically dynamically assigned.  I > suspect that this can be solved in the device tree binding for the controller > that references the bindings of the pinctrl, but this

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> IIRC Greg would prefer now to never have had the distinction >> and wants to make all future uses use a bus_type. > > Yes, that is totally correct.  Kay has also written much more about this > and why this is the way forward many times in the pas

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] pin controller subsystem v4

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: > it seems there is not an actual example that gpio requests pin from > pinctrl yet. i might give one on SiRFprimaII. No good example yet, no. The reason is that for the U300 that I use as guinea pig, the GPIO driver is tangl

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add FIMC device on Origen board

This patch adds definitions to enable support for s5p-fimc driver on Origen board. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |4 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c |4 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add FIMC device on SMDKV310 board

This patch adds definitions to enable support for s5p-fimc driver on SMDKV310 board. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |4 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c |4 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-

Re: QA tests for Android

OK, I filled out the form based on Zach's input. One can go and see an example here: + https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/viewform?hl=en_US&formkey=dGhYQ3lwdzZvRHRSWDBoT1ZETVNtMlE6MA#gid=0 Next: to help testers we want to fill out https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/BoardSup

Re: Android gcc 4.6 1107 optimization benchmark

HI Michael, The build log can be found at http://people.linaro.org/~chaoyang/shared_sources/build_2011-08-19_20-33.log The benchmark wiki page https://wiki.linaro.org/ChaoYang/Sandbox/gccoptimization is updated on 1. Adding benchmark for -fno-inline-function option (the size is reduced a bit) 2.

Re: [PATCH v6] usb: gadget: storage: make FSG_NUM_BUFFERS variable size

Hi, On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:21:27PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote: > FSG_NUM_BUFFERS is set to 2 as default. > Usually 2 buffers are enough to establish a good buffering pipeline. > The number may be increased in order to compensate a for bursty VFS > behaviour. > > Here follows a description of sys

Patch for fixing soft-reboot problem in ORIGEN

Hi Nicolas, Can you please cherry-pick following patch onto linaro kernel? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git;a=patch;h=d2edddf2b25863ec0893635662b0832f9965b543 Alternately, the patch is available at following location. (Rebased on top of linux-linaro-3.0-2011.08-

Re: [Patch v2 08/11] Touch: DA9052 touchscreen driver

On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 19:20 +0530, ashishj3 wrote: > This driver add support for DA9052 4-wire resistive ADC interfaced touchscreen > controller. > > DA9052 is a MFD therefore this driver depends on DA9052 core driver for core > functionalities. > > Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen > Signed-off-