What are the chances of a phone based developer image

2011-08-04 Thread Taras Glek
Hi, Recently we have been looking at how to squeeze more performance out of our toolchain for building Firefox on Android. Mike Hommey integrated GCC 4.6 into the android NDK and has been testing performance (with mixed results http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-08/msg00096.html). I like how Linar

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread David Gilbert
On 4 August 2011 15:28, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > On 4 August 2011 14:56, David Gilbert wrote: >> On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe >> wrote: >>> I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is >>> because dd is not writing large aligned chunks. If we can dd the fi

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread James Tunnicliffe
On 4 August 2011 14:56, David Gilbert wrote: > On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe > wrote: >> I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is >> because dd is not writing large aligned chunks. If we can dd the first >> meg or so of data onto the card, then write in 4M

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread David Gilbert
On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is > because dd is not writing large aligned chunks. If we can dd the first > meg or so of data onto the card, then write in 4MB chunks that are all > 4MB aligned that should be qui

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread James Tunnicliffe
On 4 August 2011 13:07, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > IMHO it is not stable enough and I am not sure it is worth having such > filesystem as it is mainly used for snapshotting. The last time I played > with it, the FS was quickly corrupted but I don't have to complain > because the kernel configuration

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread David Long
> As I understand it, btrfs is considered OK for file systems running on > systems that don't suffer from power failure, so for writing an image > and testing it this should be fine. > > So, what do people think about switching? I too would be considered about filesystem integrity given the nu

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Gall
Hi James On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Hi, > > Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a > bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time > to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to. > This slows do

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:46:58 +0100 James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Hi, > > Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a > bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time > to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to. > This slows down cre

Re: [Patch 01/11] MFD: DA9052 Code refactored to use regmap

2011-08-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:15:02PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote: > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig > @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ config MFD_DA9052_SPI > bool "Support Dialog Semiconductor DA9052 PMIC with SPI" > select MFD_CORE > select PMIC_DA9052 > + select REGMAP_SP

Re: [Patch v2 04/11]Power: DA9052 battery driver

2011-08-04 Thread ashishj3
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 18:22 +0530, ashishj3 wrote: > Driver for DA9052 battery charger. This driver depends on DA9052 MFD core > dirver > for definitions and methods. > > Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen > Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam > --- > Changes since v2 > - Correct code styling for inline

[Patch 01/11] MFD: DA9052 Code refactored to use regmap

2011-08-04 Thread ashishj3
DA9052 MFD Code is refactored to add remap support in the DA9052. Recent changes to DA9052 battery module also required certain components to be added in this patch. Also set bits and clear bits are removed and instead da9052_reg_update() will be used in future. Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 01:46 PM, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Hi, > > Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a > bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time > to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time

Re: Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread David Gilbert
On 4 August 2011 12:46, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Hi, > > Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a > bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time > to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to. > This slows down creating images

Re: ADB/Android Screencast

2011-08-04 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:19 +0530 Sachin Kamat wrote: [] > > I assume most people have used ADB and had to create a udev rule to > > set permissions on their board. We have a wiki page > > (https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/ConfigureAndUseAdbOnPanda) > > with the rules for Panda/TI

Changing default root file system to btrfs

2011-08-04 Thread James Tunnicliffe
Hi, Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to. This slows down creating images on SD cards a lot. I just did a very simple experiment runni

Re: ADB/Android Screencast

2011-08-04 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 3 August 2011 23:06, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Sachin Kamat > wrote: > > > > > > On 3 August 2011 14:31, Fathi Boudra wrote: > >> > >> forward to linaro-dev ml > >> > >> -- Forwarded message -- > >> From: Frans Gifford > >> Date: 3 August 2011 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SMDKV310: MMC_SPL: Fix building when using "make O="

2011-08-04 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
On 03/06/2011 06:07, Chander Kashyap wrote: Fixes dependency build error with "make O=" option. "make O=" option is used to specify output directory. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- mmc_spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-

Re: sched_mc test scenario

2011-08-04 Thread Vincent Guittot
On 4 August 2011 09:57, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/03/2011 06:25 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On 3 August 2011 15:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > [ ... ] > >>> it sounds good for me. > > Ok, cool. Thanks. > >> Concerning the f

Running a short android-build - LAVA CI cycle

2011-08-04 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, When testing Android-build to LAVA integration (not the builds themselves), it's sometime beneficial to have quick build cycle which build something (just anything) without error and submits that to LAVA, to avoid ~1hr wait for the normal build. One way to achieve that is to add "MAKE_TARG

Re: sched_mc test scenario

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/03/2011 06:25 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 3 August 2011 15:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote: [ ... ] >> it sounds good for me. Ok, cool. Thanks. > Concerning the functional tests, I need some hints :) > > On the architecture we