On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:05 PM, David Schwarz wrote:
>
> Several of us at Calxeda have been working on extensions to
> lava-dispatcher with an eye toward using it as a general test management
> engine not just for individual platforms, but for whole clusters of
> machines as well. We've broken
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:05 AM, David Schwarz wrote:
>
> Several of us at Calxeda have been working on extensions to
> lava-dispatcher with an eye toward using it as a general test management
> engine not just for individual platforms, but for whole clusters of
> machines as well. We've broken
Several of us at Calxeda have been working on extensions to
lava-dispatcher with an eye toward using it as a general test management
engine not just for individual platforms, but for whole clusters of
machines as well. We've broken our extensions into three feature
branches, which can be found
The Linaro multimedia working group will be conducting a public plan review
Monday, July 25th at 15:00 UTC. Join us to discuss our plan for 11.11
cycle, or there will also be a recording available following the review.
Specifics and slides:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles//PublicPlanReview
--
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> I started to get delivery failures like below when posting to
> linaro-dev@ , while having other recipients in to: or cc: too. It seems
> ok if I post/forward directly (and only) to linaro-dev@. Can you please
> look into this?
I've replied directly
Hello,
I started to get delivery failures like below when posting to
linaro-dev@ , while having other recipients in to: or cc: too. It seems
ok if I post/forward directly (and only) to linaro-dev@. Can you please
look into this?
Thanks,
Paul
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13
Driver for DA9052 battery charger. This driver depends on DA9052 MFD core dirver
for definitions and methods.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
---
Changes since v2
- Correct code styling for inline functions
- Remove averaging algorithm
- Set use_for_apm thru board sp
On 7/22/2011 6:15 PM, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
From: linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh
With fixed IRQ migration and forcing CPU0 into an infinite WFI loop,
I can offline CPU0 and still have a ru
> From: linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
> kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh
> > With fixed IRQ migration and forcing CPU0 into an infinite WFI loop,
> > I can offline CPU0 and still have a running system.
> >
> The secure software
(On holiday so short)
The tarball name has changed to match the new Linaro conventions. I forgot
to put that in the announcement. The inner directory name should change as
well but was missed, sorry.
On Jul 21, 2011 6:59 PM, "Paul Sokolovsky"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Well, before proceeding further, t
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:40:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2011 16:47:48 Mark Brown wrote:
> > Although the bigger problem is why are these interruptible? That's
> > very unusual.
> Well, the default should really be to use _interruptible or at least
> _killable with th
11 matches
Mail list logo
