Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread saeed bishara
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:34:48PM +0300, saeed bishara wrote: >> Russell, >>   I'm curious about the correctness of this patch for systems with >> outer cache. shouldn't the dsb be issued before the outer cache >> maintenance? > >

[ACTIVITY] Android Platform Team 2011-06-12 to 2011-06-18

2011-06-27 Thread Zach Pfeffer
== Key Points for wider discussion == * Android LEB is almost done * Pushing to AOSP == Team Highlights == * Started weekly WG and LT integration meetings * Helped debug SGX issue * Continued SPDX work * Almost finished with Pandroid build * LAVA Gtk+ published * AOSP contribution: https:/

[ACTIVITY] Android Platform Team 2011-06-05 to 2011-06-11

2011-06-27 Thread Zach Pfeffer
== Key Points for wider discussion == * LEB work progressing * Reference builds available == Team Highlights == * Gave Android Public Plan Review * Attended and participated in the Multimedia WG Mini-Summit in Austin * Started bringing in Pandroid build * 4.5 GCC packaging work == Risks / I

[ACTIVITY] Android Platform Team 2011-05-29 to 2011-06-04

2011-06-27 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Getting the Android Platform Team status pages out. Sorry for the wait. == Key Points for wider discussion == * Starting to look at shipping a full Panda LEB == Team Highlights == * Started working on Android public plan * Started interviewing new candidates * Created LT panda build to work f

Linaro GCC 4.5 entered maintenance on June 28, 2011

2011-06-27 Thread Michael Hope
This note is to confirm that Linaro GCC 4.5 entered maintenance on June 28, 2011. The new development branch is the 4.6.1 based Linaro GCC 4.6. Linaro GCC 4.5 continues to be actively supported with select high-impact bug fixes and will remain so until it enters end-of-life, shortly after Linaro

Linaro GCC 4.4 end-of-life reached on June 28, 2011

2011-06-27 Thread Michael Hope
This note is to confirm that support for Linaro GCC 4.4 formally ended on June 28, 2011. The recommended upgrade path is to our current Linaro GCC 4.6 development branch or to our Linaro GCC 4.5 maintenance branch. Third-party fixes continue to be accepted for Linaro GCC 4.4 and all releases, bran

Re: Switch to ubuntu-build.linaro.org

2011-06-27 Thread Fathi Boudra
On 27 June 2011 19:40, James Westby wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:06:08 +0300, Fathi Boudra > wrote: >> Yes. 3 consecutive days without any glitches. >> +1 on my side. > > Fathi, > > Do you want to switch this week? (I can't tell you exactly when we can > switch as it relies on the availabilit

[STATUS] Zach Pfeffer 2011/6/19 - 2011/6/25

2011-06-27 Thread Zach Pfeffer
== Zach Pfeffer pfefferz == === Highlights === * Finishing up 11.06 milestones * Tested patch to linaro-image-tools for Android LEB * Got Android PoC program underway (Frans for STE, Bernhard for Freescale) * Clarified 11.06 deliverable * Onboarded Bernhard Rosenkraenzer and Frans Gifford *

Linaro Kernel 11.06 Snapshot

2011-06-27 Thread Deepak Saxena
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the availability our June 2011 development snapshot: linux-linaro-2.6.39-2011.06-0 As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help us deliver

[ACTIVITY] OCTO status report - wk25.2011 (20110620-20110624)

2011-06-27 Thread Ilias Biris
https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/Status/2011-06-21 == Highlights == - The Memory Management group met on #linaro-mm-sig IRC channel on 20110622. A summary of the meeting: * Most of the discussion revolved around the large physical allocation support (aka CMA) - specifically on the CMA areas

Re: Switch to ubuntu-build.linaro.org

2011-06-27 Thread James Westby
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:06:08 +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: > Yes. 3 consecutive days without any glitches. > +1 on my side. Fathi, Do you want to switch this week? (I can't tell you exactly when we can switch as it relies on the availability of an IS sysadmin to make the changes.) Were you planni

RE: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread Vijaya Kumar K-1
Hi, The below are the timings on clean & flush. /* Size Clean Dirty_cleanFlush Dirty_Flush T1(ns) T2(ns) T3(ns) T2(ns) 4096 3051730517 30517 30517 8192 305173051

[ACTIVITY] Graphics WG status - wk25.2011 (20110620-20110624)

2011-06-27 Thread Ilias Biris
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/WeeklyReport == Highlights: * glcompbench and glmark2 have been released on 20110627 * unity-gles tarball on its way for the milestone release - getting ironed out as this is written * Last week's Graphics meeting was replaced b

[ACTIVITY] Multimedia WG status report - wk25.2011 (20110620-20110624)

2011-06-27 Thread Ilias Biris
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/WeeklyReport Highlights: Approaching the public plans review - blueprints are being created by the team. 5 TRs will be the work focus: - OpenMAX Integration - Userspace UMM - Codec optimization - NEON optimization forum - Audio integrati

Building/testing linaro kernels in Thumb-2

2011-06-27 Thread Dave Martin
There are brief notes about how to enable Thumb-2 kernel building here: https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_a_generic_base Currently, omap and vexpress are known to work in this configuration, and mx51evk seems to have basic support. Other platforms might not work at all.

Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > The next thing to think about in DMA-land is whether we should total up > the size of the SG list and choose whether to flush the individual SG > elements or do a full cache flush.  There becomes a point where the full > cache fl

Re: FYI: Linaro Validation showcase video at Computex 2011

2011-06-27 Thread Jim Huang
On 24 June 2011 13:17, Paul Larson wrote: > Neat!  Any feedback from those who saw it? > hi Paul, Yes, we got many feedback and inputs while presenting LAVA and corresponding Android platform support. I think most visitors agreed with the idea and importance of LAVA, but it is a bit hard for so

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem v3

2011-06-27 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, June 16, 2011 6:47 AM: >> NOW I  *think* I get it. >> >> So we're basically talking about the function mapping API here. > > Yes, basically. > > In more detail, I'm talking about making the "functions" expose

Re: Customization of Gerrit for Android

2011-06-27 Thread James Westby
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:25:59 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > hi, > > great news. > > I think we should use a different hostname for gerrit. like > review.android.linaro.org. With that we have the option to make a dedicated > android git host using the android.git.l.o name eventually. I don't und

Re: More pinmux feedback, and GPIO vs. pinmux interaction

2011-06-27 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > can you guys start cc-ing uclinux-dist-de...@blackfin.uclinux.org on > future pinmux discussions? OK! Please refer to the LKML thread: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem v3 For now, I'll include blackfin for the v4 post. > we

Re: ARM Cross-Compilation

2011-06-27 Thread Wookey
+++ Marc-André Moreau [2011-06-26 10:41 -0400]: > > Nothing wrong with this method, and it is reliable, but I find it > quicker and easier to use multistrap and do: > multistrap -f > > > Will look into that, it could save me time sorry that should read multistrap -f /usr/share/mul

Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:34:48PM +0300, saeed bishara wrote: > Russell, > I'm curious about the correctness of this patch for systems with > outer cache. shouldn't the dsb be issued before the outer cache > maintenance? Maybe we should do two passes over SG lists then - one for the inner and a

[PATCH] Samsung ARM:EXYNOS4: DMA Cleanup

2011-06-27 Thread Sangwook Lee
Function declaration differs between file:s3c-pl330.c and file:dma.h and SPARSE (Documentation/sparse.txt) gives error messages Signed-off-by: Sangwook Lee --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/dma.h | 16 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ar

Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread saeed bishara
> > +static inline void __dma_sync(void) > +{ > +       dsb(); > +} > + >  /* >  * Return whether the given device DMA address mask can be supported >  * properly.  For example, if your device can only drive the low 24-bits > @@ -378,6 +383,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_map_single(struct device

Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread Per Forlin
On 27 June 2011 12:02, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:42:52AM +0200, Per Forlin wrote: >> Conclusion: >> Working with mmc the relative cost of DSB is almost none. There seems >> to be slightly higher number for mmc blocking requests with the DSB >> patch compared to n

Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:42:52AM +0200, Per Forlin wrote: > Conclusion: > Working with mmc the relative cost of DSB is almost none. There seems > to be slightly higher number for mmc blocking requests with the DSB > patch compared to not having it. These figures suggest that dsb is comparitively

[Patch 5/11] Regulator: DA9052 regulator support v1

2011-06-27 Thread ashishj3
The DA9052 PMIC has below featured regulators:- 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 3.6V upto 1Amp. 10 Programmable LDO's High PSSR, 1% accuracy. This patch support all the DA9052 regulators. The output voltages are fully programmable via I2C or SPI interface. The platform data with regulation constraint

Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-06-27 Thread Per Forlin
On 24 June 2011 10:58, Per Forlin wrote: > On 23 June 2011 15:37, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:26:27AM +0200, Per Forlin wrote: >>> Here are the results. >> >> It looks like this patch is either a no-op or slightly worse.  As >> people have been telling me that

Re: Customization of Gerrit for Android

2011-06-27 Thread Alexander Sack
hi, great news. I think we should use a different hostname for gerrit. like review.android.linaro.org. With that we have the option to make a dedicated android git host using the android.git.l.o name eventually. Will check with android team what hostname to use exactly and let you know. On Jun

Announcement:Linaro Android 2.3.4

2011-06-27 Thread Patrik Ryd
Hi, Linaro Android has now moved up to 2.3.4 and all of our patches on the linaro_android_2.3.3 branches have been rebased. The official builds (https://android-build.linaro.org/index) are now based on the linaro_android_2.3.4 branch of the manifest. Please rebase any dev_branches you have to 2.

[PATCH 1/2] ARMV7: Add support for Samsung ORIGEN board

2011-06-27 Thread Chander Kashyap
Origen board is based upon S5PV310 SoC which is similiar to S5PC210 SoC. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- MAINTAINERS |1 + board/samsung/origen/Makefile| 46 board/samsung/origen/lowlevel_init.S | 468 ++ board/samsu

[PATCH 2/2] ORIGEN: Add MMC SPL support

2011-06-27 Thread Chander Kashyap
Adds mmc boot support. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- mmc_spl/board/samsung/origen/Makefile | 105 mmc_spl/board/samsung/origen/mmc_boot.c | 75 +++ mmc_spl/board/samsung/origen/tools/mkv310_image.c | 139 + mmc_spl/board

[PATCH 0/2] ORIGEN Board Support

2011-06-27 Thread Chander Kashyap
Adds support for ORIGEN board with MMC Booting. Chander Kashyap (2): ARMV7: Add support for Samsung ORIGEN board ORIGEN: Add MMC SPL support MAINTAINERS |1 + board/samsung/origen/Makefile | 46 ++ board/samsung/origen/lowlevel_

[powerdebug] fix segfault when no clock is available

2011-06-27 Thread Daniel Lezcano
When there is no clock available, we even register the display ops. The 'enter' callbakc is set but not data is available int the row private data which leads to a segfaults. This patch fix this problem by not registering the ops if the pm subsystem was not correctly initialized. In the meantime,

Re: [powerdebug] patches for the segmentation fault error

2011-06-27 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/27/2011 09:36 AM, Milo (Woogyom) Kim wrote: > > Hi, Daniel > > I found some segmentation fault in the powerdebug. > If there is no clock information, then windata[win].rowdata is null. > (If clock_display() returns -1, then display_set_row_data

[PATCH] mmc: mmc_test: add wait_busy to the async check_result

2011-06-27 Thread Per Forlin
add missing mmc_test_wait_busy() to the check_result_async(). Host drivers may fail it not waiting for busy state to go away before starting the next transaction. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin --- drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/