RFC: Linaro GCC stable branch

2011-06-26 Thread Michael Hope
I'm considering starting an extra branch of Linaro GCC for use in the final stages of development and would like your input. Our goal is improve the performance of real, shipping products and to help the their time to market. We make improvements and fixes to FSF GCC and then backport them to Lin

Re: [PATCH 2/6] serial: samsung: Add device tree support for s5pv210 uart driver

2011-06-26 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On 24 June 2011 01:38, Grant Likely wrote: >> Despite the fact that this is exactly what I asked you to write, this >> ends up being rather ugly.  (I originally put in the '*4' to match the >> behaviour of the existing of_read

Re: ARM Cross-Compilation

2011-06-26 Thread Marc-André Moreau
Hi Wookey, I confirm that I just got it to work with natty :D I have put my notes on the FreeRDP wiki, I'll expand the article later: http://www.freerdp.com/wiki/doku.php?id=arm_cross_compiling Since we're using libtool, the executables are wrapped behind scripts that set up proper environment v

Re: ARM Cross-Compilation

2011-06-26 Thread Marc-André Moreau
Hi Wookey, I just managed to get it to compile on oneiric. I think I figured out the problem related to pthreads: I had to install libpthread-stubs0 libpthread-stubs0-dev for the current architecture, not the target architecture, which is a bit weird, but it works. The configure script would compl

Re: ARM Cross-Compilation

2011-06-26 Thread Marc-André Moreau
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Wookey wrote: > +++ Marc-André Moreau [2011-06-23 17:40 -0400]: > > [I wrote a response to this for 4hrs last night then my mail server > crashed and lost it all - . trying agin...] > > > Hi, > > > > I am Marc-Andre from the FreeRDP project, an open source RDP cli

Re: Switch to ubuntu-build.linaro.org

2011-06-26 Thread Fathi Boudra
On 24 June 2011 17:19, James Westby wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:46 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: >> can we somehow smoke test the infrastructure continuously till >> tomorrow and then reassess tomorrow afternoon? > > We didn't add any extra stress, but all everything has been built twice >