On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:19 AM, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:46 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> can we somehow smoke test the infrastructure continuously till
>> tomorrow and then reassess tomorrow afternoon?
>
> We didn't add any extra stress, but all everything has been bui
We've got a BP for this:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-try-libjpeg-turbo
On 23 June 2011 03:30, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I took a look at the AOSP libjpeg code which is
Lets sort this out for 11.07. Got a meeting scheduled:
Tracking AOSP upstream pick up in patches.linaro.org
BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-track-aosp-patch-pickup
On 23 June 2011 08:01, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:25:18 +0200, Alexande
On 06/24/2011 08:13 PM, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
This suggests to me that a simple drop-in of libjpeg-turbo might
be actually easy to do, and that there is probably a significant
performance benefit to be achieved. One thing to keep in mind is
that this code still supports armv6, so we'd probabl
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:27:34 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> James,
>
> Thanks for jumping on this. The need for Gerrit grows by the day.
>
> The first thing I'd want to do would be to log in using my openid and
> upload my ssh key to it.
This should now be possible.
Everyone can now go to andro
The affinity between ARM processors is defined in the MPIDR register.
We can identify which processors are in the same cluster,
and which ones have performance interdependency. We can define the
cpu topology of ARM platform, that is then used by sched_mc and sched_smt.
The default state of sched_m
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Christian Robottom Reis
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:30 PM
> This suggests to me that a simple drop-in of libjpeg-turbo might be
> actually easy to do, and that there is probably a signi
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report
for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2011-06-24.
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Status/2011-06-23
== Summary ==
* AMR cpu topology patch was sent
* start to test
Enclosed please find the links to the meeting minutes and Weekly Status
report
for the kernel working group for the week ending 2011-06-24.
== Meetings minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-06-20
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Ke
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:46 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> can we somehow smoke test the infrastructure continuously till
> tomorrow and then reassess tomorrow afternoon?
We didn't add any extra stress, but all everything has been built twice
now with no builder issues. Do we have the confidence
Hi Grant,
On 24 June 2011 01:38, Grant Likely wrote:
> Despite the fact that this is exactly what I asked you to write, this
> ends up being rather ugly. (I originally put in the '*4' to match the
> behaviour of the existing of_read_number(), but that was a mistake.
> tglx also pointed it out).
Hi,
I am badly looking for this. Can you please reply with sutiable answer.
Regards
Krishna M.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Kris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried with the precompiled u-boot and MLO and it is working fine.
>
> But failed with the sources downloaded from the link provided. Can you
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 15:12, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:07 AM:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > Some more thoughts on pinmux:
can you guys start cc-ing uclinux-dist-de...@blackfin.uclinux.org on
future pinmux discussion
+++ Marc-André Moreau [2011-06-23 17:40 -0400]:
[I wrote a response to this for 4hrs last night then my mail server
crashed and lost it all - . trying agin...]
> Hi,
>
> I am Marc-Andre from the FreeRDP project, an open source RDP client. I want to
> work on optimizing FreeRDP for ARM using the
On 23 June 2011 15:37, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:26:27AM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
>> Here are the results.
>
> It looks like this patch is either a no-op or slightly worse. As
> people have been telling me that dsb is rather expensive, and this
> patch results i
On 06/23/2011 11:24 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I don't know that we're hearing that all vendor trees want to be on the
latest kernel. What I'm reading from Andy's perspective is that
it is easier to just work directly against upstream changes that to
try and figure out what a
16 matches
Mail list logo
