Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 16 June 2011 21:40, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/16/2011 01:49 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> +config SCHED_MC >> +     bool "Multi-core scheduler support" >> +     depends on SMP && ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY >> +     default n >> +     help >> +       Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU schedul

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > Hi folks, > > http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to > set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes! > > The first thing we need is the HTTP URL for the upstream master branch > of

Re: Bug escalation procedure

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > On 14 June 2011 21:53, Michael Hope wrote: >> How does this relate to working group outputs? >> >> Here's my process BTW: >>  https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/BugProcess >> >> It's unusual for a bug to be a release blocker as

[NOTES] Dev Platforms Status Meeting Notes and Actions 6/16

Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on June 16th in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 14:00 UTC. https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Meetings/2011-06-16 New and Carried Over Actions: * rsalveti

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:49:13AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > @@ -219,6 +219,24 @@ source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" > > menu "System Type" > > +config SCHED_MC > + bool "Multi-core scheduler support" > + depends on SMP && ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY > + default n > + help > + Mult

Re: Draft daily (hmm) cloud builds of Android toolchain from bzr

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:47:59 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > As for our mirror service, adding such support in maintainable manner > would require its complete rewrite (which will also allow to implement > other functionality and improvements). Adding support for what would require a complete re

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:38 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 06/16/2011 02:45 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: Hi folks, http://patches.linaro

Power Management WG Weekly Status report 2011-06-17

== Meetings minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-06-15 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PoweManagement/Status/2011-06-16 == Summary == * finalize o

RE: More pinmux feedback, and GPIO vs. pinmux interaction

Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:07 AM: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > Some more thoughts on pinmux: > > Thanks! > > Keep it coming until you get tired of me :-) > > > == GPIO/pinmux API interactions > > > > I'd like to understand how the gp

RE: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem v3

Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, June 16, 2011 6:47 AM: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > [Me] > >> Can't you just send some patch or example .h file for the API > >> you would like to see so I understand how you think about > >> this? > > > > Are your patches in git so

Kernel WG Weekly Status report 2011-06-17

== Meetings minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-06-13 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2011-06-16 == Summary == * Linaro kernel will be freezed one week before the monthly release. * linaro-android tree is now avail

Linaro 11.05 weekly testing 2011-06-16

LEBs images on their way to the next release: 11.06. * Android: http://snapshots.linaro.org/offspring/11.05-daily/linaro-android/leb-panda/20110616/ * Ubuntu: http://snapshots.linaro.org/offspring/11.05-daily/linaro-ubuntu-desktop/20110616/0/images/tar/ http://snapshots.linaro.org

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:38 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/16/2011 02:45 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday a

Re: [RFC] (early draft) dt: Linux dt usage model documentation

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:32:15AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: [...] > +About now is a good time to lay out an example. Here is part of the > +device tree for the NVIDIA Tegra board. > + > +/{ > + compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra250"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cell

Re: More pinmux feedback, and GPIO vs. pinmux interaction

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > Some more thoughts on pinmux: Thanks! Keep it coming until you get tired of me :-) > == GPIO/pinmux API interactions > > I'd like to understand how the gpio and pinmux subsystems are intended > to interact. Mainly I'd like Gran

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

On 06/16/2011 02:45 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: Hi folks, http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 16 June 2011 15:24, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:49:13AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> @@ -219,6 +219,24 @@ source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" >> >>  menu "System Type" >> >> +config SCHED_MC >> +     bool "Multi-core scheduler support" >> +     depends on SMP &&

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

Hello, Vincent Guittot, le Thu 16 Jun 2011 10:49:13 +0200, a écrit : > The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. > We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, > and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topology > of an Arm platform can be

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

Vincent Guittot, le Thu 16 Jun 2011 11:44:30 +0200, a écrit : > The output of hwloc-gather-topology is : > > Machine (phys=0 local=280840KB total=280840KB) > Socket #0 (phys=3) > Core #0 (phys=0) > PU #0 (phys=0) > Core #1 (phys=1) > PU #1 (phys=1) > depth 0:1 Machine

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Per Forlin wrote: > How significant is the cache maintenance over head? > It depends, the eMMC are much faster now > compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to > multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the > cost f

Re: [powerdebug 01/22] Add some helper functions in a specific utils file

all patches applied. ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:49:13AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > @@ -219,6 +219,24 @@ source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" > > menu "System Type" > > +config SCHED_MC > + bool "Multi-core scheduler support" > + depends on SMP && ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY > + default n > + help > + Mult

Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] omap_hsmmc: use original sg_len for dma_unmap_sg

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Per Forlin wrote: > Don't use the returned sg_len from dma_map_sg() as inparameter > to dma_unmap_sg(). Use the original sg_len for both dma_map_sg > and dma_unmap_sg. > > Signed-off-by: Per Forlin > --- >  drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |    5 +++-- >  1 files cha

Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] omap_hsmmc: add support for pre_req and post_req

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Per Forlin wrote: > pre_req() runs dma_map_sg(), post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg. > If not calling pre_req() before omap_hsmmc_request() > dma_map_sg will be issued before starting the transfer. > It is optional to use pre_req(). If issuing pre_req() > post_req() must

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem v3

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > [Me] >> Can't you just send some patch or example .h file for the API >> you would like to see so I understand how you think about >> this? > > Are your patches in git somewhere? It's much easier for me to pull > at present than grab patche

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to > > set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes! > > > > The first thin

Re: Linaro Kernel v2.6.38 build error

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:36 PM, James Westby wrote: > Hi, > > My apologies, I forgot to say that I had to use > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- KBUILD_DEBARCH=armel \ > deb-pkg > ah! thanks James it helped. > > which tells it to build the package for armel. > > Thanks, > > Ja

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 16 June 2011 13:48, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 11 Jun 16, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. >> We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, >> and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topology >>  of an Ar

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 13:25 +0300, Alexandros Frantzis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:26:57AM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to > > set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 16 June 2011 13:55, Amit Kachhap wrote: > I have some doubts about the bit fields of the MPIDR register. > Comments added below. > On 16 June 2011 14:19, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. >> We can identify which processors are in t

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 16 June 2011 12:49, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/16/2011 10:49 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> >> The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. >> We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, >> and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topolog

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

I have some doubts about the bit fields of the MPIDR register. Comments added below. On 16 June 2011 14:19, Vincent Guittot wrote: > The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. > We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, > and which ones have performance i

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 11 Jun 16, Vincent Guittot wrote: > The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. > We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, > and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topology > of an Arm platform can be set thanks to this register and t

Re: Draft daily (hmm) cloud builds of Android toolchain from bzr

Hello Alexander, On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:23 +0200 Alexander Sack wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Paul Sokolovsky > wrote: > > > > So, where do we go from here? Unless there's tip export feature > > directly out of remote repo for bzr (bzr export seem to requite > > local working cop

Re: Bug escalation procedure

On 14 June 2011 21:53, Michael Hope wrote: > How does this relate to working group outputs? > > Here's my process BTW: >  https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/BugProcess > > It's unusual for a bug to be a release blocker as there's normally > some type of work around. I'd normally only

Re: Bug escalation procedure

On 14 June 2011 17:47, James Westby wrote: > I would personally like to have just the subscription method, and the > release team to work from their subscribed bugs, raising things in the > meeting if they need to be raised. Updated in that sense. Cheers, Fathi

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 06/16/2011 10:49 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote: The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topology of an Arm platform can be set thanks to this register

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:26:57AM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > Hi folks, > > http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to > set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes! > > The first thing we need is the HTTP URL for the upstream master b

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 16 June 2011 11:47, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Vincent Guittot, le Thu 16 Jun 2011 11:44:30 +0200, a écrit : >> The output of hwloc-gather-topology is : >> >> Machine (phys=0 local=280840KB total=280840KB) >>   Socket #0 (phys=3) >>     Core #0 (phys=0) >>       PU #0 (phys=0) >>     Core #1 (phy

Re: Error while formatting SDCARD usidn lmc-0.4.8

On 16 June 2011 10:38, Amit Mahajan wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 +0100, Andy Green wrote: >> l-m-c insists on having a modern QEMU I was told. > > Seems like this is the latest in ubuntu repos. > > qemu-arm-static -v > qemu-arm version 0.12.5 (qemu-kvm-0.12.5), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 > Fa

Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

On 16 June 2011 10:55, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Vincent Guittot, le Thu 16 Jun 2011 10:49:13 +0200, a écrit : >> The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. >> We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, >> and which ones have performance interdep

Re: Error while formatting SDCARD usidn lmc-0.4.8

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > On 06/16/2011 10:19 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > >> I get the same with linaro-media-create... when I asked about it I was > >> told it's something to do with a race with my USB<-> uSD adapter. > >> > >> A workaround is

Re: Error while formatting SDCARD usidn lmc-0.4.8

On 06/16/2011 10:19 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: I get the same with linaro-media-create... when I asked about it I was told it's something to do with a race with my USB<-> uSD adapter. A workaround is to use the option on lmc to create the image to a local file, and then dd

Re: Error while formatting SDCARD usidn lmc-0.4.8

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:06 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > On 06/16/2011 09:09 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to run panda android leb using the instructions given on > > wiki. Seeing a crash while formatting the SDcard using lmc. Below are > > the crash logs

Re: Error while formatting SDCARD usidn lmc-0.4.8

On 06/16/2011 09:09 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi, I am trying to run panda android leb using the instructions given on wiki. Seeing a crash while formatting the SDcard using lmc. Below are the crash logs, seems like a known issue. Any pointers on what needs to be fixed?

[RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition

The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register. We can identify which processors are in the same cluster, and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topology of an Arm platform can be set thanks to this register and this topology is then used by sched_mc and sch

Error while formatting SDCARD usidn lmc-0.4.8

Hi, I am trying to run panda android leb using the instructions given on wiki. Seeing a crash while formatting the SDcard using lmc. Below are the crash logs, seems like a known issue. Any pointers on what needs to be fixed? Are you 100% sure, on selecting [/dev/sdc] (y/n)? y Checking that no-one