Re: LAVA Dashboard user forum

2011-06-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:21:31 +0800, Spring Zhang wrote: Non-text part: multipart/alternative > On 16 June 2011 08:59, Michael Hudson-Doyle > wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:12:19 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki < > > zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > W dniu 16.06.2011 00:19, Michael Hudson-

Re: LAVA Dashboard user forum

2011-06-15 Thread Spring Zhang
On 16 June 2011 08:59, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:12:19 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki < > zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: > > W dniu 16.06.2011 00:19, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze: > > >> I created user forum for the dashboard at: > > >> > > >> http://fracture.suxx.pl/pro

Re: LAVA Dashboard user forum

2011-06-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:12:19 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > W dniu 16.06.2011 00:19, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze: > >> I created user forum for the dashboard at: > >> > >> http://fracture.suxx.pl/projects/lava-dashboard/boards > > > Is there a way I can subscribe via email? > > There's a w

Re: Design and implementation of lava-ci tool

2011-06-15 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
W dniu 15.06.2011 22:49, Paul Larson pisze: But what about where other non-python packages need to be installed for it to work properly? That was the main thing I was trying to sort out? Does the recipe have a rule to do this? For building this knowledge is contained in the source package.

Re: LAVA Dashboard user forum

2011-06-15 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
W dniu 16.06.2011 00:19, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze: I created user forum for the dashboard at: http://fracture.suxx.pl/projects/lava-dashboard/boards Is there a way I can subscribe via email? There's a watch icon in each thread/forum. AFAIK you will be notified of changes in the objec

Re: LAVA Dashboard user forum

2011-06-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:01:03 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > Hello everyone. > > Since a few people started asking me questions about lava dashboard, > reports and other things I though I we could benefit from sharing this > knowledge. > > I created user forum for the dashboard at: > >h

Re: demystifying IRC

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Waddel
On 06/15/2011 03:49 PM, Joey Stanford wrote: >> Can you add a section on bots. I know some people are interested in >> the meeting bot. > > I'll punt that to Fathi. He's become the Bot Master :-) > > Fathi, can you add something to the bottom? Or create a new sub page under This page has lots of

Re: demystifying IRC

2011-06-15 Thread Joey Stanford
> Can you add a section on bots. I know some people are interested in > the meeting bot. I'll punt that to Fathi. He's become the Bot Master :-) Fathi, can you add something to the bottom? Or create a new sub page under https://wiki.linaro.org/GettingInvolved/IRC/ ? Thanks, J ___

More pinmux feedback, and GPIO vs. pinmux interaction

2011-06-15 Thread Stephen Warren
Linus (W), Some more thoughts on pinmux: == GPIO/pinmux API interactions I'd like to understand how the gpio and pinmux subsystems are intended to interact. Quoting from Documentation/gpio.txt: Note that requesting a GPIO does NOT cause it to be configured in any way; it just marks

Re: demystifying IRC

2011-06-15 Thread Anmar Oueja
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Joey Stanford wrote: > Hi, > > I spent some more time today fixing IRC channels and it prompted me to > write-up a wiki page on how to create channels, including the specific > commands. > > https://wiki.linaro.org/GettingInvolved/IRC/channelsetup Thanks Joey. Great page.

demystifying IRC

2011-06-15 Thread Joey Stanford
Hi, I spent some more time today fixing IRC channels and it prompted me to write-up a wiki page on how to create channels, including the specific commands. https://wiki.linaro.org/GettingInvolved/IRC/channelsetup Team Leads in particular, please have a look and make sure it's understandable. Th

Re: Design and implementation of lava-ci tool

2011-06-15 Thread Paul Larson
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki < zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote: > I was writing it this morning. It actually pulls all of the branches that > compose lava and gives you an ability to install them in a managed > virtualenv instance. > > Great! > > It seems to me, >> that

Re: Design and implementation of lava-ci tool

2011-06-15 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
W dniu 15.06.2011 20:30, Paul Larson pisze: So having those requirements my goals were to build a tool that would be useful for those two tasks: 1) Daily development helper as a sort of CI tool. 2) Monthly release helper So for purpose 1, if we wanted to use the same tool to make this easy,

Re: Design and implementation of lava-ci tool

2011-06-15 Thread Paul Larson
> > So having those requirements my goals were to build a tool that would be > useful for those two tasks: > 1) Daily development helper as a sort of CI tool. > 2) Monthly release helper > > So for purpose 1, if we wanted to use the same tool to make this easy, could we just do something like 'lava

Re: Setup of official #linaro-multimedia

2011-06-15 Thread Joey Stanford
Hi, I'll go ahead and setup the channel for you. We have a bunch of side channels today (more than what Fathi mentioned). I'm a little worried about activity not happening on #Linaro but that channel can get quite busy. J On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: > I just read Fath

Re: Setup of official #linaro-multimedia

2011-06-15 Thread Fathi Boudra
On 15 June 2011 17:02, Kurt Taylor wrote: > I just read Fathi's email about the new bots. I didn't want to hijack the > existing thread, but I have been considering setting up a new official > Linaro irc channel #linaro-multimedia with the meeting bot, etc. Here's the list of existing/active Lina

Setup of official #linaro-multimedia

2011-06-15 Thread Kurt Taylor
I just read Fathi's email about the new bots. I didn't want to hijack the existing thread, but I have been considering setting up a new official Linaro irc channel #linaro-multimedia with the meeting bot, etc. As per discussions with Ilias, I would also like to set up a new service, an IRC proxy (

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

2011-06-15 Thread Peter Maydell
On 15 June 2011 15:40, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote: >> if we want to guarantee >> that QEMU and the kernel work together I think we really >> need to pretty much freeze the kernel two weeks before >> QEMU's release date, in order to have a fighting chance >> at

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

2011-06-15 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Guilherme Salgado wrote: > Is there a mailing list to which valgrind patches are sent? If we have > one whenever you send a patch to that list with patches@l.o CCed we'll > be able to detect it's a valgrind patch and move it to the correct > project. No, there isn't. Valgrind patch contribution

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

2011-06-15 Thread Guilherme Salgado
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 16:44 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > And there's a form at the bottom which allows them to be moved to the > > appropriate project. If we're missing a project just let me know and > > I'll create it. > > It looks like there's no project for valgr

Re: Linaro Kernel v2.6.38 build error

2011-06-15 Thread James Westby
Hi, My apologies, I forgot to say that I had to use make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- KBUILD_DEBARCH=armel \ deb-pkg which tells it to build the package for armel. Thanks, James On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:03 +0530, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: > Hello James, > > I applied the pat

Re: Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

2011-06-15 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Guilherme Salgado wrote: > And there's a form at the bottom which allows them to be moved to the > appropriate project. If we're missing a project just let me know and > I'll create it. It looks like there's no project for valgrind; I have two patches accepted there ... Mit freundlichen Gruesse

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

2011-06-15 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote: > The underlying cause here is that QEMU's models are not > tested in any formal way against a specification or > against a test suite used for validating the hardware. > The main test is "does it boot Linux?". So it's inevitable > that new kernel features

[powerdebug 22/22] make some display functions static

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Make some functions static as they are no longer out of the scope of the display code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c | 124 ++-- 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) diff --git a/display.c b/display.c index 1ba

[powerdebug 19/22] Encapsulate the display (10)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The keystroke callback could be moved to the display code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c| 48 +++- display.h|8 +--- powerdebug.c | 45 + 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 5

[powerdebug 17/22] change the keystroke callback for less test

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
We can use a switch here to check the key which was stroke. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c | 43 +-- 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c index fccc08b..0b25860 100644 --- a/powerdeb

[powerdebug 20/22] Remove the useless define

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The less we have define for pm blocks the easier is to add more pm blocks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c| 24 +++- display.h|2 ++ powerdebug.h |4 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/display.c b/display.c inde

[powerdebug 18/22] cleanup the headers

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Make some cleanup around the headers. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- clocks.c |5 + display.c|4 powerdebug.c |6 +- powerdebug.h | 24 +--- regulator.c |2 ++ regulator.h |3 +-- 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(

[powerdebug 09/22] Encapsulate the display (2)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Remove the specific cases in the mainloop and encapsulate the display functions. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c| 56 ++-- display.h|6 ++ powerdebug.c | 26 +- powerdebug.h |2 -- 4 f

[powerdebug 13/22] Encapsulate the display (6)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Let's create some ops to be registered by the pm blocks to the display. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- clocks.c| 53 +++-- display.c | 11 +++ display.h |7 ++- regulator.c |8 sensor.c|8

[powerdebug 16/22] Encapsulate the display (9)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Remove unused parameter for the keystroke callback. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c | 28 ++-- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c index 28b23b4..fccc08b 100644 --- a/powerdebug.c +++ b/powerdebug.c

[powerdebug 05/22] assign a pad for each window

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Create a pad for each pm blocks, so we can use the same code to scroll the values on the display. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c | 141 ++--- 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-) diff --git a/display.c b/displa

[powerdebug 12/22] Remove unused variables

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c index 5109c90..5ff675d 100644 --- a/powerdebug.c +++ b/powerdebug.c @@ -192,9 +192,6 @@ int keystroke_callback(bool *enter_hit, struct powerdebug_

[powerdebug 03/22] Rewrite the regulator code based on the tree

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Make the code consistent with the clocks and use the tree to build the regulators. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c| 50 ++ powerdebug.c | 50 + powerdebug.h |4 +- regulator.c | 322 ++ regulator.h

[powerdebug 15/22] Encapsulate the display (8)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
We don't have anymore a specific case for each pm block as we use some ops now. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c | 12 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c index 5ff675d..28b23b4 100644 --- a/powerdebug.c +++ b/po

[powerdebug 08/22] Encapsulate the display (1)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Remove some corner cases for the footer display we have the same display feature for all the pm blocks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c| 104 +++-- display.h|2 +- powerdebug.c |9 ++--- powerdebug.h | 20 ++--

[powerdebug 14/22] Encapsulate the display (7)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c | 36 ++-- display.h | 15 +++ 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/display.c b/display.c index d55d748..92fc02a 100644 --- a/display.c +++ b/display.c @@ -218,6 +218,22 @@ int

[powerdebug 21/22] remove unselect line

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c | 16 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/display.c b/display.c index 5fd14c7..1ba71e5 100644 --- a/display.c +++ b/display.c @@ -269,27 +269,15 @@ int display_refresh_pad(int win) 0

[powerdebug 02/22] make all pm block own their display data

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
That allows to keep track of the different selections from the different windows. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- clocks.c | 20 ++-- display.c| 96 -- powerdebug.c |4 +- powerdebug.h | 18 +- 4 files ch

[powerdebug 11/22] Encapsulate the display (4)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Remove the old "findparent" code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c | 60 + 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c index f73aafe..5109c90 100644 --- a/powerdebug.c +++ b/po

[powerdebug 04/22] Rewrite the sensor code with the tree

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Use the tree to build a sensor tree and make the code consistent with the other pm blocks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c |7 ++- powerdebug.h |2 +- sensor.c | 261 -- 3 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 120 de

[powerdebug 07/22] make the functions name consistent

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- clocks.c |4 ++-- clocks.h |4 ++-- powerdebug.c |5 +++-- sensor.h |3 +++ 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/clocks.c b/clocks.c index c86a39e..db219d8 100644 --- a/clocks.c +++ b/clocks.c @@ -332,7 +332,

[powerdebug 10/22] Encapsulate the display (3)

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c | 30 -- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c index e702011..f73aafe 100644 --- a/powerdebug.c +++ b/powerdebug.c @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int getoptions(int argc, char *

[powerdebug 06/22] add sensors display

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Add the sensor display. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- display.c|6 +- powerdebug.c | 33 + sensor.c | 56 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/display.c b/

[powerdebug 01/22] Add some helper functions in a specific utils file

2011-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- Makefile |2 +- clocks.c | 62 +- utils.c | 55 +++ utils.h | 22 ++ 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

Please help us setup patches.linaro.org

2011-06-15 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Hi folks, http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes! The first thing we need is the HTTP URL for the upstream master branch of every project on the front page -- I'll take a git:// URL if that's al

LAVA Dashboard user forum

2011-06-15 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
Hello everyone. Since a few people started asking me questions about lava dashboard, reports and other things I though I we could benefit from sharing this knowledge. I created user forum for the dashboard at: http://fracture.suxx.pl/projects/lava-dashboard/boards Please go there and post

Re: Linaro Kernel v2.6.38 build error

2011-06-15 Thread Deepti Kalakeri
Hello James, I applied the patch you provided and tried the steps you mentioned. I am using omap2plus_defconfig, but the make deb-pkg fails with the following error: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armel' does not appear in package's architecture list () make[1]: *** [deb-pkg]

ARM porting Jam *today* 14:00 - 18:00 UTC)

2011-06-15 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi fellow ARM fans, Linaro Developer Platform team organises every week (Wednesday 14:00 - 18:00 UTC) an ARM porting Jam. The idea is to gather all developers together to fix userspace portability issues across the board. The list of bugs being worked on is at launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.ne

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

2011-06-15 Thread Peter Maydell
On 15 June 2011 11:14, Alexander Sack wrote: > Anyway, I really hope this is unlikely to happen for now [I should start this email with a disclaimer: this isn't intended to be finger pointing, just an explanation of why we should expect and plan for QEMU breakage rather than hoping it is unlikely

Re: Draft daily (hmm) cloud builds of Android toolchain from bzr

2011-06-15 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > So, where do we go from here? Unless there's tip export feature > directly out of remote repo for bzr (bzr export seem to requite local > working copy), we'd need to play mirror, this time bzr, again %). For the reason that it is trivial

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

2011-06-15 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 15 June 2011 00:47, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: >>> Does the kernel have to boot under the latest QEMU release? >> >> For device tree support I would think so.  An older Linaro release for >> U-Boot

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

2011-06-15 Thread Peter Maydell
On 15 June 2011 00:47, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: >> Does the kernel have to boot under the latest QEMU release? > > For device tree support I would think so.  An older Linaro release for > U-Boot should be fine too.  Maybe John Crigby could provide more deta

Re: [PATCH 00/11] RFC: DA9053 PMIC driver

2011-06-15 Thread Eric Miao
Hi Dajun, I didn't track the patch series you sent out. Did you receive any review and feedback and got them all addressed? Would you please send the updated version if available? And Cc linaro-dev is more than welcome. We have people eager to get this upstreamed. Thanks - eric On Sun, Jun 12,

RE: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem v3

2011-06-15 Thread Stephen Warren
Linus Walleij wrote at Tuesday, June 14, 2011 8:26 AM: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > I'm a little confused by this version. > > Sorry, I'll try to clarify. > > > In particular: > > > > * I don't see some changes that I thought we'd agreed upon during earlier > >

Re: Linaro multimedia work group mini-summit minutes and actions

2011-06-15 Thread DRC
Just FYI-- for those interested in the ARM porting effort in libjpeg-turbo, the iOS and Android camps reached a resolution, and the patches they agreed upon have been committed to trunk. Independent evaluation by any of you who have an interest in this would be very much appreciated. On 6/14/11

Re: [RFC] (early draft) dt: Linux dt usage model documentation

2011-06-15 Thread Shawn Guo
Hi Grant, On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:32:15AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: [...] > +Linux board support code calls of_platform_populate(NULL, NULL, NULL) > +to kick of discovery of devices at the root of the tree. The > +parameters are all NULL because when starting from the root of the > +tree, the