Cool. Thanks James.
On 14 June 2011 16:32, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:03:41 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> On 14 June 2011 07:52, James Westby wrote:
>> > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:22:23 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
>> > wrote:
>> >> No, we shouldn't have to adjust our hosting. Take a
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
> Nico,
> Is there any dependency on the Toolchain WG?
> Does the latest kernel have to be built using the latest Toolchain release?
No, it doesn't have to. That would be a good thing to do nevertheless.
> Does the kernel have to boot under the latest
On 14 June 2011 15:16, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
> Nico,
> Is there any dependency on the Toolchain WG?
> Does the latest kernel have to be built using the latest Toolchain release?
Good question. As we get the CI loop going, I imagine that we'll want the
kernel building with multiple tool chains th
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:41:21 +1200
> Michael Hope wrote:
>
> []
>> > Note that it now expects bzr branch with explicit version, e.g.
>> > lp:gcc-linaro/4.5 or lp:gcc-linaro/4.6 .
>>
>> Minor nit: these are called 'serie
Nico,
Is there any dependency on the Toolchain WG?
Does the latest kernel have to be built using the latest Toolchain release?
Does the kernel have to boot under the latest QEMU release?
Thanks,
Mounir
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> As you might know already, Linaro is m
As you might know already, Linaro is moving to a monthly release of
technology preview for most of the components being worked on. This
obviously includes the kernel, so some coordination amongst all people
involved is required.
It was decided that those releases would happen on the last Thurs
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an update to the bug management process. The wiki page is:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/BugManagement
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fathi
> --
>
> Bug escalation procedure
>
>
> It's important that bugs which aff
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:03:41 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> On 14 June 2011 07:52, James Westby wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:22:23 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> > wrote:
> >> No, we shouldn't have to adjust our hosting. Take a look at
> >> http://android.git.kernel.org/ where all the Android trees
Hi,
I just tried .39 and there's no OMAP4, so the headers install if I use
the omap2plus_defconfig.
I was then able to get deb-pkg to work after a fix to allow
cross-building the package.
This seems to produce something reasonable for us to use, but it may be
more robust to use the defconfigs wi
I've been holding this back a bit as I was hoping the omap4 hdmi issue
would get resolved upstream in Nico's tree first, but with the month
half over, this needs to go out.
Anyway, the 2.6.39 based branch of the linaro-android tree is now
available:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jstultz/an
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Far McKon wrote:
> Grant,
> I don't see any system for indicating an expandable bus or a pulg in
> module so far? Am I missing something, or does this protocol/layout
> not allow for plug in or expansion modules?
The DT as we're using it now primarily captures the
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:02:00 +, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> On 14 June 2011 15:36, James Westby wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:13 +, Fathi Boudra
> > wrote:
> >> * All bugs in a 'High' or 'Critical' state should be highlighted to the
> >> Linaro
> >> Release Team: Please, add it to
On 14 June 2011 15:36, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:13 +, Fathi Boudra
> wrote:
>> * All bugs in a 'High' or 'Critical' state should be highlighted to the
>> Linaro
>> Release Team: Please, add it to the wiki page 'Bugs' section for the next
>> release meeting. The re
Hello.
Over the past two weeks I've been prototyping a new tool for managing
releases of Linaro validation deliverables. Some of the problems are
unique (we target older releases, we are upstream) some are shared
(building lots of packages together, making sure they all work,
reproducing buil
Hi again,
> You will need:
>
> CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y
> CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=n
also CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND=y seems to be required, as it doesn't get set
automatically.
Tentative testing suggests that a Thumb-2 kernel built for imx51 from
the current linux-linaro-oneiric/master branch also works.
Do yo
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:13 +, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> * All bugs in a 'High' or 'Critical' state should be highlighted to the Linaro
> Release Team: Please, add it to the wiki page 'Bugs' section for the next
> release meeting. The release meeting calendar can be found on the wiki.
> Me
Hi,
This is an update to the bug management process. The wiki page is:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/BugManagement
Cheers,
Fathi
--
Bug escalation procedure
It's important that bugs which affect the LEB's and other images are caught
early and fixed as soon as possibl
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> (...)
> To sum up, it looks like the conceptual model is thus:
>
> - A pinmux driver enumerates and registers all the pins that it has
> - Setup code and/or driver code requests blocks of pins (functions)
> when it needs them
> - If all the p
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I'm a little confused by this version.
Sorry, I'll try to clarify.
> In particular:
>
> * I don't see some changes that I thought we'd agreed upon during earlier
> review rounds, such as:
>
> ** Removing pinmux_ops members list_functions,
On 14 June 2011 07:52, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:22:23 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> No, we shouldn't have to adjust our hosting. Take a look at
>> http://android.git.kernel.org/ where all the Android trees are hosted.
>
> What does this mean for the hosting of Gerrit though
See https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/2011-06-14 plus inline:
== Actions from previous meeting ==
== Attendees ==
* David Rusling
* Loïc Minier
* Steve !McIntyre
* Paul !McKenney
* Grant Likely
* Ilias Biris
* Konstantinos Margaritis
== Minutes ==
* Actions from the last meeting
* O
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:22:23 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> No, we shouldn't have to adjust our hosting. Take a look at
> http://android.git.kernel.org/ where all the Android trees are hosted.
What does this mean for the hosting of Gerrit though. Does this mean
that Gerrit has to be on a server wi
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:41:21 +1200
Michael Hope wrote:
[]
> > Note that it now expects bzr branch with explicit version, e.g.
> > lp:gcc-linaro/4.5 or lp:gcc-linaro/4.6 .
>
> Minor nit: these are called 'series'.
I understand that in Launchpad's terms it's series, but there's do
On 13 June 2011 22:46, James Westby wrote:
> Hi Zach,
>
> Thanks for the prompt response.
>
> Please asssume that you are talking to someone that has never used
> Gerrit before :-)
>
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:27:34 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> James,
>>
>> Thanks for jumping on this. The need
Hi Joe,
thanks for the review, excellent as always.
I fixed all except the below pattern, also searched the source to make sure
there were no other cases of the same errors.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> +int pinctrl_register_pins_dense(struct pinctrl_pin_desc const *p
On 06/14/2011 10:41 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
This patch fixes a NULL-dereference introduced by commit 457520e
("arm: pmu: support pmu/perf on OMAP4").
Some platforms (e.g. vexpress) neither need nor have an instance of
arm_pmu_platdata (plat). Perf support on these p
This patch fixes a NULL-dereference introduced by commit 457520e
("arm: pmu: support pmu/perf on OMAP4").
Some platforms (e.g. vexpress) neither need nor have an instance of
arm_pmu_platdata (plat). Perf support on these platforms was broken by
the original commit.
This patch adds a check for pla
Hi,
It sounds like we have found someone to volunteer for the first steps
of the Android review blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-o-code-review
/Patrik
On 14 June 2011 05:46, James Westby wrote:
> Hi Zach,
>
> Thanks for the prompt response.
>
> Ple
Hi John,
With nico's patch, the linux-linaro-2.6.39 tree now seems to work with
CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL in the general case.
I've tested this configuration on Versatile Express, and it seems to
work. Do you want to have a go at turning this configuration on in the
packaged kernel tree?
You will ne
Comments below. Only really considering gaps in content or emphasis
here, not poor wording or grammatical errors.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:32:15AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
> ---
>
> Hey all,
>
> This is an early draft of the usage model document for the device
Linus Walleij wrote at Monday, June 13, 2011 10:58 AM:
> This creates a subsystem for handling of pinmux devices. These are
> devices that enable and disable groups of pins on primarily PGA and
> BGA type of chip packages and common in embedded systems.
I'm a little confused by this version. In pa
> +Some time later, FDT infrastructure was generalized to be usable by
> +all architectures. At the time of this writing, 5 mainlined
> +architectures (arm, mips, powerpc, sparc, and x86) and 1 out of
microblaze too?
> +mainline architecture (nios) have some level of DT support.
> +
Steve
Thi
32 matches
Mail list logo
