On 10.06.2011 20:41, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
== Meetings minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-06-08
Does anybody have some additional details on MMC HPI interrupts?
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-06-08#Morning_meeting_IRC_log
:
" I
On 06/09/2011 10:50 PM, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
Hi. I'm trying to push DA9053 PMIC driver to mainline kernel.
Please help me to review these patches.
Many Thanks.
Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) (11):
PMIC: Add DA9053 headers from Dialog
Is this for the 9053
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 25 May 2011 04:45, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
>
>
> > FWIW, here's what the kernel part might look like, i.e. for
> > compatibility with pre ARMv6k systems (beware, only compile tested):
>
>
>
> Hi Nicolas,
> I've just about got a set of gcc back
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:31:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> What's the subject and mailing list of the other submission? I might
> have a look at that then.
There's been some insanely large number of submissions (I think we must
be over 20 by now) and one of the issues is that they're not th
== Meetings minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-06-08
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2011-06-09
== Summary ==
* Public Plan review for cycle 11.11
* Production of the initial linaro-2.6.39 tree
Regards,
Mounir
__
On Friday 10 June 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:38:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > I've reviewed part of it now. Once you have addressed the issues I pointed
> > out, please do another round of reviews, then I can look at more files.
>
> In case you hadn't seen it
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:38:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I've reviewed part of it now. Once you have addressed the issues I pointed
> out, please do another round of reviews, then I can look at more files.
In case you hadn't seen it I previously pointed out that there's a
separate series
On Friday 10 June 2011, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Add DA9052 gpio driver from Dialog.
> Modify Kconfig/Makefile for DA9052 gpio driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Jingyu
> Acked-by: Lily Zhang
> Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
> ---
> drivers/gp
On Friday 10 June 2011, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Hi. I'm trying to push DA9053 PMIC driver to mainline kernel.
> Please help me to review these patches.
I've reviewed part of it now. Once you have addressed the issues I pointed
out, please do another r
On Friday 10 June 2011, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
>
> +config PMIC_DIALOG
> + bool "Support Dialog Semiconductor PMIC"
> + depends on I2C=y
> + depends on SPI=y
> + select MFD_CORE
> + help
> + Support for Dialog semiconductor PMIC chips.
> + Use the options prov
On Friday 10 June 2011, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
>
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Add DA9053 headers source code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Jingyu
> Acked-by: Lily Zhang
> Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
> ---
> include/linux/mfd/da9052/adc.h | 66 +++
> includ
On 25 May 2011 04:45, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> FWIW, here's what the kernel part might look like, i.e. for
> compatibility with pre ARMv6k systems (beware, only compile tested):
Hi Nicolas,
I've just about got a set of gcc backend changes working for the inline case
and plan on attacking lib
Meeting minutes in https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/2011-06-07
== Summary ==
* Setup for August sprint in discussion
* status.linaro.org fixed for Octo, but not everything shows up (eg LLVM
was not showing due to missig series target for TR, fixed now)
* ARMHF:
* weekly sync for HF setup
Please check the following links for details
Meeting minutes :
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-06-08
Status:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Status/2011-06-08
== Summary ==
* status.linaro.org should have easily accessible point
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:18:10AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > Bisecting when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y reproducibly identified
> > af3e4fd37a18f2e5a00175bc96061541d1364a3b as the first bad commit
> > between v2.6.39 and linux-linaro-2.6.39/master, but i
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:51:00AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Add DA9052 mfd driver from Dialog.
> Modify Kconfig/Makefile for DA9052 mfd driver.
This needs to be the first patch in the series, all the other patches
need it to work. Essentially a
On 06/10/2011 01:17 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:51:02AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
Add DA9052 regulator driver from Dialog.
Modify Kconfig/Makefile for DA9052 regulator driver.
This has *many* of the seri
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:51:02AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Add DA9052 regulator driver from Dialog.
> Modify Kconfig/Makefile for DA9052 regulator driver.
This has *many* of the serious shortcomings that were present in the
original driver subm
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:50:54AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Hi. I'm trying to push DA9053 PMIC driver to mainline kernel.
> Please help me to review these patches.
Dialog have been submitting separate copies of this into mainline for
quite some
On 06/10/2011 04:50 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
+static ssize_t write_da9052_reg(struct da9052 *da9052, u8 reg_addr, u8 data)
+{
+ ssize_t ret = 0;
+ struct da9052_ssc_msg ssc_msg;
+
+ ssc_msg.addr = reg_addr;
+ ssc_msg.data = data;
+ ret = da90
On 06/10/2011 04:50 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Just some small comments...
It's worth running ./scripts/checkpatch.pl if you didn't already.
+#define DRIVER_NAME "da9052-gpio"
+static inline struct da9052_gpio_chip *to_da9052_gpio(struct gpio_chip *chip)
Don't need
On 06/10/2011 09:17 AM, Barry Song wrote:
we will find many compiling error like: "break strict-aliasing rules",
"used uninitialized in this function" and so on. all those actually
are warnings which become errors due to -Werror option. A patch like
the below can make compiling pass, but we feel
Dear Jim,
After changing TARGET_TOOLS_PREFIX in
build/core/combo/TARGET_linux-arm.mk to
android-toolchain-eabi-4.5-2011.05, then source build/envsetup.sh. go
to dalvik/vm dir by:
cd dalvik/vm
compile dalvik in this dir:
mm -B
we will find many compiling error like: "break strict-aliasing rules",
"u
23 matches
Mail list logo
