The patch d795e2c "Adding omap_gpu drm display driver" introduces
following compilation warning when the kernel is compiled for x86
architecture (i386_defconfig). Also the kernel compilation is
unsuccessful because of calls to omap specific platform header files.
warning: (VIDEO_OMAP2_VOUT && D
On 31 May 2011 21:33, Per Forlin wrote:
> Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was
> triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to
> raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the CCCR_INTx
> register. This behaviour is not support
On Tue, 31 May 2011 13:42:56 +0800, Spring Zhang
wrote:
> Seems lava-dispatcher online now, some blueprints change from lava to
> lava-dispatcher,
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-lava-dispatcher-improvements,
> also lava-server and lava-scheduler.
Ah y
On 05/31/2011 08:48 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
Since there is no lp project (that I am aware of) for the pmqa tests, I
think I just reported it to Amit directly at the time. Iirc, he said to
follow up on it when he had someone working on the qa tests, which appears
to be you, so I'm doing that now.
Wookey,
the short answer is 'yes'. The next question is 'who?'.Maybe
this can be bolted onto the hard float work, I'll let Konstantinos and
Steve respond...
Dave
On 06/01/11 01:22, Wookey wrote:
[Apologies for the wide distibution of this mail (Debian, Ubuntu and
Fedora main+arm dev
On 31 May 2011 16:54, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 30 May 2011 08:48, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On 27 May 2011 11:45, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>>> On 26 May 2011 20:17, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
My only comment is on:
What We're Not Doing
Integrating graphics drivers
● Handled by
On 30 May 2011 08:48, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 27 May 2011 11:45, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 26 May 2011 20:17, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> My only comment is on:
>>>
>>> What We're Not Doing
>>>
>>> Integrating graphics drivers
>>> ● Handled by vendor Landing Team
>>>
>>> I think aspects of this wi
See https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status/2011-06-02 for all links
== Key Points for wider discussion ==
* Need to replace the kernel in the Panda-LEB build with Linaro's
kernel and support GFX
* Need to compile the Panda-LEB build with Linaro's toolchain
== Team Highlights ==
* Rele
Return error in case of pending IRQ but none functions bits
in CCCR_INTx is set.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
index 2f81ddc..8184b6e
Make sdio single irq run time configurable, default is disable. This is due
to an issue in libertas where the SDIO device seems to raise interrupt
even if there are none function bits in CCCR_INTx set. This behaviour
is not defined by the SDIO spec.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/core
Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was
triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to
raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the CCCR_INTx
register. This behaviour is not supported by the sdio_single_irq feature nor
the SDIO sp
Since there is no lp project (that I am aware of) for the pmqa tests, I
think I just reported it to Amit directly at the time. Iirc, he said to
follow up on it when he had someone working on the qa tests, which appears
to be you, so I'm doing that now. :) Do you have a place where bugs for it
sho
On 05/31/2011 05:46 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
Has the bug that caused pm qa tests to hang on beagleXM been fixed yet? We
had these tests running daily at one time, but had to disable them because
they were completely hanging the boards.
Oh, I was not aware of such bug. Do you have a pointer to th
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 03:35:42PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > I think the difficulty here is that glibc expects either the compiler,
> > or libgcc to provide the sync primitives; and while GCC can tie the
> > inlined copy of the primitive to use of
[Apologies for the wide distibution of this mail (Debian, Ubuntu and
Fedora main+arm dev lists, plus linaro and lsb) but it's useful to
catch people who care about this issue enough to do some work. Do
please bear the distribution in mind when replying, focussing any
detailed discussion on linaro-d
Has the bug that caused pm qa tests to hang on beagleXM been fixed yet? We
had these tests running daily at one time, but had to disable them because
they were completely hanging the boards.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
>
> Here is a bunch of scena
Here is a bunch of scenarii I am planning to integrate to the pm-qa package.
Any idea or comment will be appreciate.
Note the test cases are designed for a specific host configured to
have a minimal number of services running on it and without any pending cron
jobs. This pre-requisite is needed
On 31 May 2011 15:35, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I think the difficulty here is that glibc expects either the compiler,
> or libgcc to provide the sync primitives; and while GCC can tie the
> inlined copy of the primitive to use of CPUs with the relevant
> instruction, the libgcc version doesn't kn
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 03:35:42PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 13:17 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:38:25AM +0200, Ken Werner wrote:
> > > On 05/25/2011 03:17 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > >On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:58:30PM +0100, David Gilber
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 13:17 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:38:25AM +0200, Ken Werner wrote:
> > On 05/25/2011 03:17 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > >On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:58:30PM +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> > >>On 25 May 2011 04:45, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >>>FWIW, here
Hi all,
The public reviews for Linaro plans for this year start today with the first
session talking about Power Management WG plans.
Please participate if you're interested in hearing what we'll be working on.
Feedback is very welcome.
Slides and participation details are at
https://wiki.linaro
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Ilias Biris wrote:
> Picking up this subject again, here is a wiki page with the ideas
> mentioned in the thread and (currently) my comments on those ideas:
>
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/ProjectManagement/ParkingLot/DevelopmentCycleProposal
>
>
> You can check out
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:38:25AM +0200, Ken Werner wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 03:17 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:58:30PM +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> >>On 25 May 2011 04:45, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>>FWIW, here's what the kernel part might look like, i.e. for
> >>>compatibil
Picking up this subject again, here is a wiki page with the ideas
mentioned in the thread and (currently) my comments on those ideas:
https://wiki.linaro.org/ProjectManagement/ParkingLot/DevelopmentCycleProposal
You can check out the proposals, correct if there is anything
wrong/missing, and add
Hi Rob,
The patch d795e2c "Adding omap_gpu drm display driver" introduces
following compilation warning when the kernel is compiled for x86
(i386_defconfig). Also the kernel compilation is unsuccessful because of
calls to omap specific platform header files.
warning: (VIDEO_OMAP2_VOUT && DRM
Hello,
Linaro-cloud-buildd is the system which utilizes EC2 cloud to build
Linaro Android releases and developments images,
https://android-build.linaro.org/
After Linaro 11.05 release is out and pre-release infrastructure freeze
is over, cloud build instances were upgraded to use Ubuntu 11.04
(N
26 matches
Mail list logo
