Re: pulseaudio eating up 100% cpu on i.MX53 QuickStart, anyone has samilar issue?

2011-05-23 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Eric Miao wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Eric Miao wrote: >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Kurt Taylor >> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Eric Miao wrote: Hi all, When debugging video playback performance issue, we fou

Re: pulseaudio eating up 100% cpu on i.MX53 QuickStart, anyone has samilar issue?

2011-05-23 Thread Eric Miao
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Eric Miao wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Eric Miao wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> When debugging video playback performance issue, we found that pulseaudio is >>> eating up 100% cpu time. Just in cas

Re: reorganzing the lava projects on launchpad

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 19 May 2011 17:05:09 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hi there, > > Some of you know about this already as it was discussed a bit at LDS, > but probably not very inclusively. > > We have a slightly strange arrangement of projects on Launchpad, with > the main ones being "launch-cont

Re: Usefulness of GCC's 64bit __sync_* ops on ARM

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Hope
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Michael Casadevall wrote: > On 05/19/2011 10:56 AM, David Gilbert wrote: >> On 19 May 2011 16:49, Ken Werner wrote: >>> On 05/19/2011 12:40 PM, David Rusling wrote: Is this going to end up in a blueprint?   This is the last loose end of SMP / atomi

Re: Usefulness of GCC's 64bit __sync_* ops on ARM

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Casadevall
On 05/19/2011 10:56 AM, David Gilbert wrote: > On 19 May 2011 16:49, Ken Werner wrote: >> On 05/19/2011 12:40 PM, David Rusling wrote: >>> >>> Is this going to end up in a blueprint? This is the last loose end of >>> SMP / atomic memory operations work and I'd like to see it happen >> >> Hi, >>

Re: approaching a final kernel for 11.05

2011-05-23 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > On 24 May 2011 00:53, Ricardo Salveti wrote: Can you boot with omapdss.debug=1 drm.debug=7 and give me your kernel log? >>> >>> Please find the log attached. >> >> Interesting, the driver didn't find your monitor at all! >> [    5.738

Cortex A8 code analysis tool

2011-05-23 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
I just noticed today an online code cycle analyzer that targets the Cortex-A8: http://pulsar.webshaker.net/ccc/index.php?lng=us Does anyone know who the author of that is, and whether he'd be interested in doing an A9 update? -- Christian Robottom Reis | [+55 16] 3376 0125 | http://launchp

Re: approaching a final kernel for 11.05

2011-05-23 Thread Jaswinder Singh
On 24 May 2011 00:53, Ricardo Salveti wrote: >>> Can you boot with omapdss.debug=1 drm.debug=7 and give me your kernel log? >> >> Please find the log attached. > > Interesting, the driver didn't find your monitor at all! > [    5.738037] omapdss HDMI: Fail to detect the connector and force is > en

Re: approaching a final kernel for 11.05

2011-05-23 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > On 23 May 2011 05:44, Ricardo Salveti wrote: >> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Jaswinder Singh >> wrote: >>> On 22 May 2011 04:38, John Rigby wrote: This is the same problem that marcin and I have seen.  See https://bugs.laun

Re: OMAP3 IGEPv2: kworker/0:0:1030 blocked on latest snapshots

2011-05-23 Thread Tom Gall
Hi John, echo blacklist wl12xx_sdio > /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-wireless.conf reboot Doesn't change the behavior on my Xm. Anything else you want me to try just hollar. Regards, Tom On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, John Rigby wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Tom Gall wrote: >> I've

Re: Do we need prebuilt images of all types?

2011-05-23 Thread Guilherme Salgado
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 12:49 -0400, James Westby wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:32:27 +0100, David Gilbert > wrote: > > On 20 May 2011 17:12, James Westby wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell > > > wrote: > > >> We're only doing this once a month, we should just produ

Re: OMAP3 IGEPv2: kworker/0:0:1030 blocked on latest snapshots

2011-05-23 Thread John Rigby
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Tom Gall wrote: > I've also seen it on my beagle Xm from time to time. Agree, be nice to > figure out who is > blocked and why. > ok, its not the wireless driver mishaving then ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@list

Re: OMAP3 IGEPv2: kworker/0:0:1030 blocked on latest snapshots

2011-05-23 Thread John Rigby
I have only seen this with the wireless problem already noted. Can you see if blacklisting the wireless driver fixes the problem? echo blacklist wl12xx_sdio > /etc/modeprobe.d/blacklist-wireless.conf reboot On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > Hi there, > >    I'm

Re: OMAP3 IGEPv2: kworker/0:0:1030 blocked on latest snapshots

2011-05-23 Thread Tom Gall
I've also seen it on my beagle Xm from time to time. Agree, be nice to figure out who is blocked and why. On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > Hi there, > >    I'm playing around with the latest snapshots on my IGEPv2 and I'm > seeing a recurring message posted to the

Re: OMAP3 IGEPv2: kworker/0:0:1030 blocked on latest snapshots

2011-05-23 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia 2011-05-23, pon o godzinie 10:10 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis pisze: > Hi there, > > I'm playing around with the latest snapshots on my IGEPv2 and I'm > seeing a recurring message posted to the console while using it: > > [ 1561.340942] INFO: task kworker/0:0:1030 blocked for more

OMAP3 IGEPv2: kworker/0:0:1030 blocked on latest snapshots

2011-05-23 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
Hi there, I'm playing around with the latest snapshots on my IGEPv2 and I'm seeing a recurring message posted to the console while using it: [ 1561.340942] INFO: task kworker/0:0:1030 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1561.350860] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeou

Re: [[PATCH Android device/linaro/pandaboard]] Remove init.ompa4.sh

2011-05-23 Thread Jim Huang
On 23 May 2011 16:54, Patrik Ryd wrote: > The file init.ompa4.sh only contained one line for setting > ro.runtime.device. This property is not used so the file > can be removed. hi Patrik, Thanks for cleaning up. It looks great to me. So, we are going to be more consistent in device/linaro/com

[[PATCH Android device/linaro/pandaboard]] Remove init.ompa4.sh

2011-05-23 Thread Patrik Ryd
The file init.ompa4.sh only contained one line for setting ro.runtime.device. This property is not used so the file can be removed. Bug #747911 --- AndroidBoard.mk |5 - init.omap4.rc |3 --- init.omap4.sh |3 --- 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) delete mode