On 11 April 2011 23:14, Patrik Ryd wrote:
> diff --git a/BoardConfig.mk b/BoardConfig.mk
> index 5314353..457ab4f 100644
> --- a/BoardConfig.mk
> +++ b/BoardConfig.mk
> @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ TARGET_NO_KERNEL := false
> KERNEL_CONFIG := android_omap4_defconfig
> TARGET_USE_UBOOT := true
> UBOOT_CONFIG
Hi,
Could you provide us Jason's detailed analysis about V4L2 API gap/issues ?
Do you already have in mind a list of requirements for this API (frame
based, asynchronous, memory management/allocation, power ...) ?
Benjamin
2011/4/11 Eric Miao
> Hi All,
>
> Not really sure how this is being di
---
BoardConfig.mk |3 ++-
MLO.panda | Bin 0 -> 22072 bytes
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 MLO.panda
diff --git a/BoardConfig.mk b/BoardConfig.mk
index 5314353..457ab4f 100644
--- a/BoardConfig.mk
+++ b/BoardConfig.mk
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ TARGET_NO_KERN
---
tasks/bootfiles.mk |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tasks/bootfiles.mk b/tasks/bootfiles.mk
index 8489e69..c9cea21 100644
--- a/tasks/bootfiles.mk
+++ b/tasks/bootfiles.mk
@@ -8,5 +8,8 @@ bootfiles:
ifeq ($(TARGET_USE_UBOOT),true)
cp $(PRODUCT
Hi All,
Not really sure how this is being discussed in the Multimedia WG. But
do we yet have a standardized kernel driver framework for video
acceleration?
A bit investigation showed a chaos in this area:
1. Different SoC vendors are using their specific APIs
2. The freescale case, there is a p
Amitk, So can I turn on all the CONFIG_PM* stuff for samsung now?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> I could not find this changes in the latest 2.6.38 Linaro kernel. Please
>> merge the patch from the below
>>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I could not find this changes in the latest 2.6.38 Linaro kernel. Please
> merge the patch from the below
> mentioned samsung maintainers next link as this is required for the PM
> Linaro release.
It is merged now.
Nicolas
___
Hi,
notes and actions from our Wednesday graphics working group call are
available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-04-06
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Grap
---
BoardConfig.mk |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/BoardConfig.mk b/BoardConfig.mk
index 882a994..e8135c1 100644
--- a/BoardConfig.mk
+++ b/BoardConfig.mk
@@ -4,8 +4,13 @@
#
TARGET_BOARD_PLATFORM := montblanc
-TARGET_NO_BOOTLOADER := true
+TARGET_
Introduced a alternative way of building u-boot instead of forcing
u-boot to be built as if it was Androids 2ndbootloader.
---
BoardConfig.mk |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/BoardConfig.mk b/BoardConfig.mk
index 227f676..e538591 100644
--- a/BoardConfig
Use u-boot as the 2NDBOOTLOADER.
---
BoardConfig.mk |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/BoardConfig.mk b/BoardConfig.mk
index 6b808e2..07488f9 100644
--- a/BoardConfig.mk
+++ b/BoardConfig.mk
@@ -4,9 +4,12 @@
#
TARGET_BOARD_PLATFORM := omap4
-TARGET_NO_
Set TARGET_NO_KERNEL to false in BoardConfig and use
android_omap4_defconfig when building kernel.
---
BoardConfig.mk |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/BoardConfig.mk b/BoardConfig.mk
index 82a06bd..6b808e2 100644
--- a/BoardConfig.mk
+++ b/BoardConfig.mk
@
Introduced a alternative way of building u-boot instead of forcing
u-boot to be built as if it was Androids 2ndbootloader.
---
BoardConfig.mk |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/BoardConfig.mk b/BoardConfig.mk
index 07488f9..5314353 100644
--- a/BoardConf
Introduced a alternative way of building u-boot instead of forcing
u-boot to be built as if it was Androids 2ndbootloader.
---
tasks/bootfiles.mk | 12
tasks/kernel.mk|1 -
tasks/uboot.mk |3 +--
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 t
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 18:24 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 17:15, James Westby wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:41:26 +0100, Peter Maydell
> > wrote:
> >> On 8 April 2011 15:14, James Westby wrote:
[...]
>
> >> In that case I'd like it to be able to replace my
> >> manual wiki-b
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:25 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:14 PM, James Westby wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This service is going to be used by management to get an idea of the
> > number of patches going to each project over time, the number of patches
> > submitted upstream by
Dear Minkyu,
On 1 April 2011 12:52, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> On 31 March 2011 18:14, Chander Kashyap
> wrote:
> > SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
> > similar to S5PC210.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> > Signed-off-by: Tushar
Does anybody knows which kernel version will have support for SD4.0 specs
UHS-2?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 10 April 2011 05:33, anish singh wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jae hoon Chung
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Per..
> >>
> >> I'm applied your pa
Hi,
As we near final release it is even more important that bugs which
effect the LEB's and other images are caught early and fixed as soon as
possible. To help aid the Linaro Release Team [1] in identifying and
dealing with these types of bugs the following procedure significantly
helps on projec
On 9 April 2011 13:55, Jae hoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Per..
>
> I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c.
> I think good this approach..
>
Do you have any test results from the mmc_tests I added?
I am interested in the results.
Regards,
Per
> Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung
>
> Regards,
>
On 10 April 2011 05:33, anish singh wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jae hoon Chung wrote:
>>
>> Hi Per..
>>
>> I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c.
>> I think good this approach..
>
> Forlin,i too want to test this patch of yours but unfortunately i have
> samsu
21 matches
Mail list logo