Re: [powerdebug V2: 01/14] encapsulate the options code

2011-03-24 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Yong Shen wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Yes. I had started the work for several days. > Previously, every time when clock info is refreshed, the data structure will > be reallocated as if it is the first time of building up clock info. The > goal is only allocating memory

[PATCH] toolchain/build: Fix Linaro Android toolchain linking fail with FDO

2011-03-24 Thread Luse Cheng
Add --with-sysroot to fix Linaro Android toolchain linking fail with FDO --- linaro-build.sh | 15 ++- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/linaro-build.sh b/linaro-build.sh index f238ba8..97da183 100755 --- a/linaro-build.sh +++ b/linaro-build.sh @@ -20,6

Re: [powerdebug V2: 01/14] encapsulate the options code

2011-03-24 Thread Yong Shen
Hi Daniel, Yes. I had started the work for several days. Previously, every time when clock info is refreshed, the data structure will be reallocated as if it is the first time of building up clock info. The goal is only allocating memory once, which means less system call made by malloc and also r

[Paul Wise] ARM support to be removed from IcedTea

2011-03-24 Thread James Westby
Hi, Just making sure that Linaro people have seen this. Thanks, James --- Begin Message --- http://gbenson.net/?p=257 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/012556.html http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/013044.html http://mail.openjdk.jav

Re: ARM support to be removed from IcedTea

2011-03-24 Thread Xerxes Rånby
> http://gbenson.net/?p=257 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/012556.html > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/013044.html > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/013059.html > http://gbenson.net/?p=239 To cl

Re: [powerdebug V2: 01/14] encapsulate the options code

2011-03-24 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 03/24/2011 10:09 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: On 11 Mar 23, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Create a single structure for powerdebug options. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- powerdebug.c | 173 +- 1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 75 deletions

Re: [powerdebug V2: 01/14] encapsulate the options code

2011-03-24 Thread Amit Kucheria
On 11 Mar 23, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Create a single structure for powerdebug options. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- > powerdebug.c | 173 > +- > 1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) > Hi Daniel, I've tested an

Re: How do you see a patch series?

2011-03-24 Thread Guilherme Salgado
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 09:56 -0700, Andy Doan wrote: > On 03/22/2011 08:05 AM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > That's to decide whether we should count the patches that belong to a > > series individually or not. > > > > Could you generate two sets of stats like "Total Patches Per Author" and > "Tota

Re: RFC: ARM: Support for VFP/NEON registers in coredumps

2011-03-24 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > I would prefer to keep the contents of NT_VFPREGSET identical to the > > contents of the PTRACE_GETVPFREGS/PTRACE_SETVPFREGS buffer: > > > > - This would allow implementation via the new generic user_regset_view > >  

Re: RFC: ARM: Support for VFP/NEON registers in coredumps

2011-03-24 Thread Dave Martin
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Dave Martin wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ulrich Weigand > wrote: >> > 1) Have *two* new note types, one for VFP, and one for NEON >> >> That may not make sense, since really it's a single register file >> shared by VFP and NE

Re: RFC: ARM: Support for VFP/NEON registers in coredumps

2011-03-24 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > 1) Have *two* new note types, one for VFP, and one for NEON > > That may not make sense, since really it's a single register file > shared by VFP and NEON. With NEON, you always have 32 x 64-bit regs, > but it's poss

Re: RFC: ARM: Support for VFP/NEON registers in coredumps

2011-03-24 Thread Dave Martin
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Dave Martin wrote: > >>  c) Create a new note type specially for this, and dump the >>     VFP/NEON regs in there.  This is closest to the model followed >>     by ptrace, where PTRACE_GETREGS, PTRACE_GETFPREGS and >>     PTRAGE_GETVFPREGS

ARM support to be removed from IcedTea

2011-03-24 Thread Paul Wise
http://gbenson.net/?p=257 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/012556.html http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/013044.html http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/013059.html -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/Pau

Re: RFC: ARM: Support for VFP/NEON registers in coredumps

2011-03-24 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Dave Martin writes: > Hi all, > > Considering how to add the VFP/NEON register state to Coredumps, > there's no single obvious solution, so I'd like to put this out > for people's comments. > > Currently, the coredump consists of several notes, the interesting > ones currently being: >

Re: RFC: ARM: Support for VFP/NEON registers in coredumps

2011-03-24 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Dave Martin wrote: > c) Create a new note type specially for this, and dump the > VFP/NEON regs in there. This is closest to the model followed > by ptrace, where PTRACE_GETREGS, PTRACE_GETFPREGS and > PTRAGE_GETVFPREGS are all distinct. >From a GDB perspective, I'd consider this t

RFC: ARM: Support for VFP/NEON registers in coredumps

2011-03-24 Thread Dave Martin
Hi all, Considering how to add the VFP/NEON register state to Coredumps, there's no single obvious solution, so I'd like to put this out for people's comments. Currently, the coredump consists of several notes, the interesting ones currently being: * NT_PRSTATUS - general process status, includ

Re: how to sync with mainline

2011-03-24 Thread Barry Song
Thank all of you very much. My all questions have got good answers. Comparing linaro kernel and mainline with same versions, there are a lot of backport, bug fixes and new feature commit logs in fact. Great! 2011/3/17 Nicolas Pitre : > > Sorry for not answering earlier.  I was on vacation last wee

Re: Future desktop on dumb frame buffers?

2011-03-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 15:09:54 Robert Fekete wrote: > On 21 March 2011 21:08, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 20:25, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:19:43 + timofonic timofonic wrote: > S

Re: [PATCH] Dpkg/Shlibs.pm: multiarch search paths

2011-03-24 Thread Hector Oron
Hi, 2011/3/23 Steve Langasek : >> (Apologies for big attachment on previous email) > Your mail doesn't seem to have made it through to the Debian mailing lists, > and it arrived at the linaro list with the attachments stripped (presumably > for size). :(  Can you post these logs on a website som

Re: [powerdebug V2: 14/14] Add configure framework

2011-03-24 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 03/24/2011 11:25 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: On 11 Mar 23, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Wednesday 23 March 2011, Daniel Lezcano wrote: But anyway, if adding autoconf/automake for powerdebug is a problem, we can drop the two last patches. Amit ? Your other patches certainly look good to me, and I'm

Re: [powerdebug V2: 14/14] Add configure framework

2011-03-24 Thread Amit Kucheria
On 11 Mar 23, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 23 March 2011, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > But anyway, if adding autoconf/automake for powerdebug is a problem, we > > can drop the two last patches. > > Amit ? > > Your other patches certainly look good to me, and I'm not going > to block your a

Re: [PATCH android/device/linaro/pandaboard] Add vold.fstab

2011-03-24 Thread Patrik Ryd
On 23 March 2011 18:03, Jeremy Chang wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Patrik Ryd wrote: > > On 23 March 2011 09:01, Jeremy Chang wrote: > >> > >> vold.fstab is the vold configuration file to tell what the device to > >> mount. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Chang > >> --- > >> devic

Re: [PATCH android/device/linaro/pandaboard] Add vold.fstab

2011-03-24 Thread Jim Huang
On 24 March 2011 01:03, Jeremy Chang wrote: [...] > Hi, Patrik, >    How should I add the linaro copyright? like below line? > > # Copyright (C) 2011 Linaro - http://linaro.org > hi Jeremy, Please check the text description: https://wiki.linaro.org/Copyright Regards, -jserv __