On 18 March 2011 23:37, Jesse Barker wrote:
> Hi all,
> Thought this might be of interest to folks.
> http://www.glbenchmark.com/result.jsp?benchmark=glpro20&orderby=405&screen-group=true&screen-group-value=1&submi=OK&screen=4&screen=3&screen=2&screen=1&screen=0&os=0&os=1&os=2&os=3&os=4&version=al
Hi there,
I'm currently working on the PatchTracking[1] spec and, wrt patch
series, I'm wondering whether you consider the patches that are part of
a series to be separate or the series to be a single entity?
Thanks!
[1] https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/PatchTracking
--
Gu
Hi,
notes and actions from our Wednesday graphics working group call are
available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-03-16
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Grap
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on March 16th
in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC.
http://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Meetings/2011-03-16
Actions from the meeting where as follows:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 10:46 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
>
> Change-Id: I2cd4ccdf7edc39b025ef39bd5db0154c616aa5a9
> ---
> WebKit/android/nav/FindCanvas.cpp |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Very cool work!
One nit: Would you mind adding a
With the platform clock support, the 'struct clk' should have been
associated with device_node->data. So the use of function
__of_clk_get_from_provider can be eliminated.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
drivers/of/clock.c | 23 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletio
This patch is to change the static clock creating and registering to
the dynamic way, which scans dt clock nodes, associate clk with
device_node, and then add them to clkdev accordingly.
It's a pretty straight translation from non-dt clock code to dt one,
and it does not really change any actual c
The patch is to add all available dt clock nodes for babbage board.
It sticks to the clock name used in clock-mx51-mx53.c, so that
everything gets consistent to Reference Manual. For example, the
numbering in clock name usually starts from 1, while 'reg' property
numbering starts from 0 to easy cl
The big deal here is that it removes the call to mx51_clocks_init,
where all the possible clocks are added to clkdev in static way.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-d
This new member is not necessary to support dt clock, but it can
simplified the code a lot in terms of those fixed rate clocks.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/clock.h |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/includ
This patch set is to add full platform dt clock support for mx51
babbage, based on Grant's devicetree/test tree. All mx51 non-dt
clocks in clock-mx51-mx53.c are translated to dt ones.
Regards,
Shawn
Changes since v1:
* unify the references to clocks that could be created statically
and dynam
This pointer to 'struct clk' is added to save the reference to 'clk'
which is dynamically created per dt clock node, so that clkdev API
like clk_get can work with dt based device driver.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
---
include/linux/of.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
d
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Tixy wrote:
>> > Hello All
>> >
>> > I'm about to start work on getting kprobes working with thumb2.
>> >
>> > One of the issues I have is that when probes are pl
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:47:49PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:04:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:37:31AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:22:10AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > This patch is to change the static cl
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:54:32PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:43:34PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:49:17AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:42:38AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:39PM +0
Hi,
The Infrastructure team weekly report for 2011-03-17 is now available
and can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Status/2011-03-17
The report is also reproduced in full below.
Regards,
Jamie.
--
Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
--
* Period
Hi all,
Thought this might be of interest to folks.
http://www.glbenchmark.com/result.jsp?benchmark=glpro20&orderby=405&screen-group=true&screen-group-value=1&submi=OK&screen=4&screen=3&screen=2&screen=1&screen=0&os=0&os=1&os=2&os=3&os=4&version=all&certified_only=1&brand=all
http://www.glbenchm
Hi,
The Validation team weekly report for 2011-03-17 is now available and
can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Validation/Status/2011-03-17
The report is also reproduced in full below.
Regards,
Jamie.
--
Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
--
* Period: (20110
Hi,
The Android team weekly report for 2011-03-17 is now available and can
be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status/2011-03-17
The report is also reproduced in full below.
Regards,
Jamie.
--
Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
--
* Period: (20110310-20
Hi,
The Developer Platform team weekly report for 2011-03-17 is now
available and can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Status/2011-03-17
The report is also reproduced in full below.
Regards,
Jamie.
--
Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
--
* Perio
This patch looks pretty safe.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130045643531514&w=3
The bug is not critical but produces a lengthy kernel warning message
that may be alarming to some users.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http:
This patch supports cpuidle framework for EXYNOS4210. Currently,
Only one idle state is possible to use, but more idle states can
be added following by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Jaecheol Lee
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
FIX: Fixed the merging issue reported by Nicolas Pitre
Sending
> for +junk branches launchpad probably doesn't offer a merge feature
> ... so just push to the proper project, like:
>
> lp:~lag/linaro-image-tools/lt-ux500-support
>
> for such branch you should be able to find a "request a merge" button.
Thanks Alex.
It is now done.
__
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 16:49 +, Lee Jones wrote:
linaro-media-create dies whilst looking for ux500 based files. This
amendment allows it to work with old and new hardware packs alike.
>>> Thanks for the patch, but can you prop
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:43:34PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:49:17AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:42:38AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:39PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > + aips@83f0 {
> >
On 18 March 2011 07:06, Jim Huang wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 23:35, Patrik Ryd wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start
> pushing
> > them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use
> > the toolchain_preview branch when working with the t
>> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 16:49 +, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> linaro-media-create dies whilst looking for ux500 based files. This
>>> amendment allows it to work with old and new hardware packs alike.
>>>
>> Thanks for the patch, but can you propose a merge in Launchpad with this
>> change, including
27 matches
Mail list logo
