query regarding perf

2011-02-01 Thread Sudip Jain
Hi, I am struggling to run perf tool on u8500 as hwpacks for 2.6.35 kernel are still not out. Can someone help me know if anyone is using perf on arm-based board such as panda, beagle etc. Ideally, I would like to start a firefox application, and run command 'perf stat -p -e cycles sleep 1' Reg

Re: Device tree support for 11.05

2011-02-01 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 07:52:03PM +0800, Jason Hui wrote: > Hi, Grant, > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Jason Hui wrote: > > Hi, Grant and Nico, > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Nicolas Pitre > > wrote: > >> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Grant Likely wrote: > >> > >>> 2011/1/26 Grant Likely

Re: Booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 on Beagle Board

2011-02-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:23:38PM +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > On 02/01/2011 03:50 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Avik Sil wrote: > >> After trying all the suggestions finally I had to resort to linaro kernel > >> packaging (https://wiki.linaro.org/PackageYourO

Linaro 11.05 Alpha-2 Candidate testing

2011-02-01 Thread Jamie Bennett
Hi, The Linaro 11.05 Alpha-2 image [1] is set to be released on Thursday 3rd February (in two days !) [2] and we need your help. In addition to our in-house validation testing we ask anyone with supported hardware, as found on: http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/hwpacks/alpha-2-rc/ to

Re: Linaro Image Tools 0.4.3 released

2011-02-01 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011, Avik Sil wrote: > Won't the link be https://launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+milestone/0.4.3? Yes; I failed to s/0.4.2/0.4.3 when resending; grmpf -- Loïc Minier ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://li

Re: Booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 on Beagle Board

2011-02-01 Thread Michael Opdenacker
On 02/01/2011 03:50 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Avik Sil wrote: >> After trying all the suggestions finally I had to resort to linaro kernel >> packaging (https://wiki.linaro.org/PackageYourOwnKernel) to deploy the >> kernel which gave me the maximum sane output, but

Re: [PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

2011-02-01 Thread Pawel Moll
> So, I do hope that someone decides to implement something more reasonable > if Versatile Express were to get a DMA controller. If it's another PL08x > then it isn't worth it - it won't work. More likely it will be DMA-330 formerly known as PL330. But as I said - it's about the chip that Core Ti

Re: [PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

2011-02-01 Thread Pawel Moll
> Have you considered switching the ISP1761 handler to > request_threaded_irq() with IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND > so it runs in process context with that IRQ masked off, until completion? That's something that Will suggested, but no - I didn't try it. This may be worth discussing with the ISP1

Re: tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch

2011-02-01 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:50:48 +0100 Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011, Wookey wrote: > > But if something is looking for arch-independent stuff in /lib then in > > general that's wrong, and I'm not aware of any examples of > > correctly-packaged packages that need this. Any arch-independent

Re: Booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 on Beagle Board

2011-02-01 Thread Robert Nelson
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Avik Sil wrote: > After trying all the suggestions finally I had to resort to linaro kernel > packaging (https://wiki.linaro.org/PackageYourOwnKernel) to deploy the > kernel which gave me the maximum sane output, but still failed to get the > shell: http://paste.ubu

Re: [PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

2011-02-01 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:34:59PM +, Pawel Moll wrote: > > And to prove the point, I have MMCI running at up to 4Mbps, an 8 fold > > increase over what the current fixed upper-rate implementation does. > > The adaptive rate implementation is just a proof of concept at the > > moment and requir

Re: [PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

2011-02-01 Thread Linus Walleij
2011/1/21 Russell King - ARM Linux : > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 05:20:57PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> The only solution in that case is to give top priority to the FIFO IRQ >> and never disable IRQs when in interrupt context, except for that FIFO >> servicing handler which should keep IRQs maske

Re: Booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 on Beagle Board

2011-02-01 Thread Avik Sil
After trying all the suggestions finally I had to resort to linaro kernel packaging (https://wiki.linaro.org/PackageYourOwnKernel) to deploy the kernel which gave me the maximum sane output, but still failed to get the shell: http://paste.ubuntu.com/560935/ I tried disabling UUID validation as giv

Re: l-m-c console arguments

2011-02-01 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Guilherme Salgado < guilherme.salg...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:08 +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Steve Langasek > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:04:45AM +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > >> I just tried

Re: l-m-c console arguments

2011-02-01 Thread Guilherme Salgado
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:08 +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Steve Langasek > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:04:45AM +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote: > >> I just tried to create an SD image for the beagle with l-m-c from bzr. > >> The kernel command-line ends up cont

Re: [PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

2011-02-01 Thread Pawel Moll
> And to prove the point, I have MMCI running at up to 4Mbps, an 8 fold > increase over what the current fixed upper-rate implementation does. > The adaptive rate implementation is just a proof of concept at the > moment and requires further work to improve the rate selection algorithm. Great, I'v

Re: Linaro-Natty images on the PandaBoard

2011-02-01 Thread Ken Werner
On Monday, January 31, 2011 11:17:35 pm Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:28:35 +0100, Ken Werner wrote: > > On Monday, January 31, 2011 5:45:28 pm Tom Gall wrote: > > > Hi Ken, > > > > > > FWIW I'm running fairly recent linaro images on my pandaboard with > > > success. > > >

Re: tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch

2011-02-01 Thread Neil Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 31/01/11 20:18, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:16:15PM +, Wookey wrote: >> So, the questions is - which of these is the correct fix: >> 1) make dpkg-cross copy over symlinks even when they point into >> /usr/share >> 2) mak

Re: tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch

2011-02-01 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011, Wookey wrote: > But if something is looking for arch-independent stuff in /lib then in > general that's wrong, and I'm not aware of any examples of > correctly-packaged packages that need this. Any arch-independent files > will be supplied by an arch all package that the build

Re: [PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

2011-02-01 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:10:50PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > I guess you haven't thought about moving MMCI to an adaptive clocking > solution? What I'm suggesting is halve the clock rate on FIFO error > and retry. Increase the clock rate on each successful transfer up > to the maxi

Re: l-m-c console arguments

2011-02-01 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:04:45AM +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote: >> I just tried to create an SD image for the beagle with l-m-c from bzr. >> The kernel command-line ends up containing 'console=tty0 >> console=NONE,115200n8'. Board configuratio